User talk:Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for St Mark's CofE School. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! — Rod ^talk 20:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus (talk) 21:02, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced

Hi, re this edit - please see the documentation for {{unreferenced}}, where it says that this template should only be used on "articles that contain zero sources of any kind" - this article has one inline ref and seven external links, thus {{refimprove}} would be more suitable. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:44, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, thanks. Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus (talk) 17:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Project UK Education

Would you be interested in helping improve UK education articles? Mark999 (talk) 13:04, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I claim no special expertise in this area. Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus (talk) 15:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus. You have new messages at Boing! said Zebedee's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please accept my apology

I must apologize for the edit you brought up on my talk page. I am not sure what happened. I saw your message and the first thought that came to my mind was that I had not edited that page in quite a while. Then I looked at my contributions and there was the edit. All I can think of is that I accidently hit the revert link. Once again I apologize. GB fan (talk) 20:42, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks, no harm done. 20:45, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The Userpage Shield
		Thanks for removing vandalism from my user page. Cheers! This lousy T-shirt (talk) 01:28, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This lousy T-shirt (talk) 01:28, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

There are all too few editors interested in fringe archaeology subjects, and I appreciate your efforts. Dougweller (talk) 18:07, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus (talk) 18:13, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware of our fringe noticeboard at WP:FTN? Dougweller (talk) 00:20, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

re

Hello HP, I did reply on my talk. If you feel there is a persistent issue here (other than that individual AfD discussion), then please keep a list of a few diffs to establish a pattern which could constitute harassment. If you'd like, I'd be happy to put your contribs. on my watchlist, and keep an eye open for further disruption. You should certainly be free to edit, and express your opinions in various debates without snide and sarcastic remarks. — Ched : ? 08:48, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OH, and by the way HP, the baiting comment was not directed at you in the least. Just read up on the policy links as you run across them, and you'll do fine. There are a lot of "ins and outs" here, so don't get discouraged. Cheers, — Ched : ? 09:30, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you but I'm afraid I really don't care right now. Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus (talk) 09:37, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We are working to resolve the issues at hand HP. Please allow us the time to clear things up, and hopefully we can see you return in the near future. This is a global site, and as such we have just about any variety of editor here, that you would find out in the real world. We all communicate differently, but hopefully we can find a ground on which all participants can share the load. I apologize if my efforts have not been as optimal as you would have liked, but I was, and am, doing the best I can to ensure that our project is served in a positive manner. Hope to see your return in the near future. — Ched : ? 11:24, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ("Demonstrable case of wiki-hounding by 'clean start' account") — I will also leave a note at User talk:Sergeant Cribb. ╟─Treasury Tag►UK EYES ONLY─╢ 07:41, 24 May 2011 (UTC) ╟─Treasury Tag►UK EYES ONLY─╢ 07:41, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

In this issue:

Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
Research: The most recent DR data
Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->

--The Olive Branch 19:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]