User talk:IlyaV

Welcome!

Uniqueness theorem

Last time I promised you a shiny new page for uniquess theorem (mathematical) but later I found it beyond my capacity and lost interest in editing Wikipedia.Sorry for that.

Today I reread Uniqueness theorem.Then I found a mistake.You write

"Using the identity

\mathbf {\nabla } \cdot (\phi \epsilon \mathbf {\nabla } \phi )=\epsilon (\mathbf {\nabla } \phi )^{2}+\mathbf {\nabla } \cdot (\epsilon \mathbf {\nabla } \phi )

"

But in fact,it should be

\nabla \cdot (\phi \epsilon \nabla \phi )=\epsilon {{(\nabla \phi )}^{2}}+\phi \nabla \cdot (\epsilon \nabla \phi )

In fact,I want to continue talking about the "outermost surface integral" stuff,but let's settle down this issue first.--Netheril96 (talk) 04:58, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought again and found that I was wrong with the "outermost surface integral" stuff.--Netheril96 (talk) 05:42, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're absolutely right! Thanks for the correction. Again, if you want to expand upon the uniqueness theorem article, please do so! IlyaV (talk) 00:09, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naomi Ginsberg

I've completed this nomination, which can be found at the link above. If you like, you can go and expand on your rationale (which I took from your edit summary), and explain in more detail why the article should be deleted. Best, UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 21:56, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Johnphoto - old.jpg

The file File:Johnphoto - old.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]