User talk:Infobesity

Welcome!

Hello, Infobesity, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Darwinek (talk) 20:46, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fraser Franks

The article Fraser Franks has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brendan Kiernan

The article Brendan Kiernan has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Monty ₈₄₅ 03:56, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Wimbledon squad

Hi, I've restored Jordaan Brown to the AFC Wimbledon squad list. He is listed on the BBC website as taking squad no 24, with Huw Johnson as 32. Technically I think both are in the reserves but I've taken the view that if they've got first team squad numbers then they can be listed in the first team. The alternative view you could take would be neither have ever played for the first team (unused sub doesn't count!) and both should be deleted.-- MLD · T · C · @: 21:05, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. When you recently edited AFC Wimbledon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. When you recently edited Hampton & Richmond Borough F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reece Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:10, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Jack Turner (footballer), please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Giant Snowman 08:02, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The burden of evidence is entirely on the editor (i.e. you) adding information to an article. Giant Snowman 11:09, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But the truth is still, that there was not need to delete the content, if you bothered to check the information yourself. That could have saved us both some time.
--Sine Cera, Infobesity (talk) 11:14, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. You may remove any material lacking an inline citation to a reliable source." Giant Snowman 12:31, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stil not needed to have done that actually. Even though 'the rules' says you can do so. This dialogue won't get any further.
--Sine Cera, Infobesity (talk) 12:38, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I very much should have done that - unreferenced information, especially about living people, is simply not acceptable, and all the sources I could find from a quick Google search were blogs and Twitters etc. Please read WP:BLP, WP:RS and WP:V for more information. Giant Snowman 12:49, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Allright.. fair enough, I understand the point in biographys on wiki. It still amuses and amazes me though that you could not find anything on google, as I did it in few seconds. Perhaps you should practise using that tool, since you have the responsibily as an administrator..

I'm fully capable of using Google thankyouverymuch, but all that came up on the first page was nothing of any use (although I've just re-searched it and the site you linked to now appears). Giant Snowman 12:57, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if that comment offended you. I have a quick question on refs actually... what is the best form of doing refs? I mean, if I should include accesdate and all that or not, all the time, and so on?
--Sine Cera, Infobesity (talk) 13:01, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. Ideally you should include accessdates, but sometimes I forget as well! Giant Snowman 13:04, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I my countrys wiki (Denmark/danish) they sometimes 'store' a websiteedition, so that the ref does not 'disappear' if the website goes offline.. is there sometimes I should learn that for? And do you have a link how to? And I would be happy to get a link to form of template on how to do proper refs. Thank you in advance for your time - so far also. I know I can be a little rude and provocative! ;-)
--Sine Cera, Infobesity (talk) 13:11, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You could always try the Wayback Machine which stores old versions of web pages. And would something like {{Cite web}} be helpful? Giant Snowman 13:21, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to AFC Wimbledon, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Mdann52 (talk) 15:55, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dorchester Town F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dorchester (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Croydon Athletic to A.F.C. Croydon Athletic

Correct me if I'm wrong, but does the AFC in A.F.C. Croydon Athletic not stand for Association Football Club Croydon Athletic like with A.F.C. Hornchurch or A.F.C. Telford United? Stephen Day (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HB Køge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anders Nielsen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:HB Køge squad

When you know that there are three players born in the same year, of which two in the same month, why didn't you solve the problem yourself? The Banner talk 20:27, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Reserves and Academy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enfield (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Reserves

Hello, Infobesity, and thank you for your contributions!

Some text in an article that you worked on Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Reserves, appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Reserves and Academy. Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Reserves at any time. MadmanBot (talk) 12:41, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Reserves

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Reserves. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Reserves and Academy. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Reserves and Academy – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. BiH (talk) 12:50, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have redirected you page to Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Reserves and Academy. Best regards, --BiH (talk) 12:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You made a mistake...

The original article should be deleted and made into to articles like I did. Just look on the 2 pages from the Arsenal article concerning the Reserves and the Academy. It is 2 different things. --Sine Cera, Infobesity (talk) 12:55, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AFC Wimbledon–Milton Keynes Dons F.C. rivalry

The article AFC Wimbledon–Milton Keynes Dons F.C. rivalry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

What rivalry? Only one match played; no evidence of notability, not covered in significant detail by reliable, third-party sources. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 17:04, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AFC Wimbledon–Milton Keynes Dons F.C. rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AFC Wimbledon–Milton Keynes Dons F.C. rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFC Wimbledon–Milton Keynes Dons F.C. rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Giant Snowman 18:58, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited AFC Wimbledon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014–15 HB Køge season may have broken the syntax by modifying 5 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:34, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 HB Køge season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AGF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Infobesity. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Academy

The article Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Academy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is just duplication of already existing information on Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Reserves and Academy and should be deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Govvy (talk) 21:17, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Academy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Govvy (talk) 22:06, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Infobesity. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Infobesity. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2008–09 AFC Wimbledon season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2008–09 AFC Wimbledon season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008–09 AFC Wimbledon season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 09:52, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]