User talk:Interwebs
|
Welcome
[edit]Hello Interwebs, and welcome to Wikipedia! We're really glad you've chosen to sign up for an account; it offers numerous benefits in case you weren't already aware of them.
Thankyou for your contributions if you've been editing before you got this message. If you haven't, don't worry: there are numerous ways you can contribute to Wikipedia if you're not sure where to start yet. Either way, we hope you'll like the place and decide to stay. We all remember what it's like to be new, so don't let others scare you off.
Useful links
[edit]Here's some useful links that will help you get started.
Wikipedia:How to edit a page - it's a lot easier than you might think.
Tutorial - a collection of pages explaining the most important things for contributing to Wikipedia.
Sandbox - the best place for trying things out. If previous edits you made to articles have been reverted because they were experimental or unconstructive, this is the place to make test edits.
Wikipedia:Where to ask a question - Wikipedia has numerous places for you to put your questions and comments forward.
Wikipedia:Five pillars - Wikipedia's official policies and guidelines are summarized here.
Wikipedia:Manual of Style - our style guide outlines our standards for ensuring that we present information in a consistent manner that promotes cohesion and professionalism.
Contributing
[edit]With these references at hand, we hope you find it easier to contribute to Wikipedia. Here's a brief synopsis of some ways you can:
- We obviously wouldn't have an encyclopedia without articles. This page shows how you can help them grow.
- Removing vandalism and keeping the integrity of articles intact is a great way of contributing. More information on how to do so can be found here.
- Fixing typos, correcting poor grammar and repairing broken links are just some examples of useful, behind the scenes contributions. Even just making things look nice makes using Wikipedia more pleasant for everybody.
- If you like working with images, you might be interested in the Graphic Lab. Similarly, this page shows you how to work with images in Wikipedia articles.
- This page lists the many types of tasks you can do to maintain Wikipedia.
- There are numerous WikiProjects that aim to provide coordination and collaboration on particular subjects. From this list, you can join a project and contribute within an area that interests you.
Of course, there are many ways of contributing, but I hope that this message is helpful to you, and that you'll enjoy editing Wikipedia and continue to do so. You can respond to this message by clicking here if you have a comment or need help - don't forget to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), or you can place {{helpme}} on your talk page and write your query there. Again, welcome to Wikipedia! WilliamH (talk) 12:32, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the Welcome! Interwebs (talk) 12:43, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Seriously. Do your worst. Interwebs (talk) 20:40, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Food For Thought
[edit]See Talk:Travis Childers. You may want to revert (or partialy revert) your recent edit to this page (or you may not, I leave it in your hands).--Dr who1975 (talk) 05:03, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Same-sex marriage amendment list
[edit]Hey, notice you've been updating that page with current election results. You undid an edit in which I moved Michigan into the Virginia category, mentioning that no source was cited. When I made the change, I did note the court case on which I was basing the move on the Talk page -- check it out. The Michigan Supreme Court has ruled that the amendment bans public employers from offering domestic partner benefits (another kind of contract). I am not sure I love our three categories (marriage, marriage/CU, marriage/CU/other contracts) but I think it's clear Michigan belongs in the third if we leave them that way.--Inonit (talk) 04:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Good job!
[edit]Good job cleaning up the attempted white wash on the Tony Alamo article. You JUST beat me to it! Wowest (talk) 15:32, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
List of defense of marriage amendments to U.S. state constitutions by type
[edit]I have nominated List of defense of marriage amendments to U.S. state constitutions by type for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hekerui (talk) 19:27, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- "Goodbye robots" lol Hekerui (talk) 09:51, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Internet pipes & TCP
[edit](Series_of_tubes, about You undoing my edit) What do You mean it's original research? If You mean the mechanism, see Congestive_collapse. If you mean I have no proof he was thinking TCP.. - "Technical analysis" is IMHO not about mind reading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mateuszzz88 (talk • contribs) 00:57, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Dental caries GA Sweeps: On Hold
[edit]I have reviewed Dental caries for GA Sweeps to determine if it still qualifies as a Good Article. In reviewing the article I have found several issues, which I have detailed here. Since you are a main contributor of the article (determined based on this tool), I figured you would be interested in contributing to further improve the article. Please comment there to help the article maintain its GA status. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
AfD
[edit]Please check out: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Series of tubes (3rd nomination). Thanks. Kitfoxxe (talk) 14:11, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
New Article
[edit]Could you look over Jack Murphy (basketball) for me, and make sure everything is in order? I made it today, using other Asst. coach articles as a guide, just wanted to check. Azyrii (talk) 00:24, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Basketball players
[edit]I'm unsure of Wikipedia's policies towards this, but what criteria are needed to create an article on a current NCAA basketball player? An article for former Memphis player Willie Kemp was deleted, citing "No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content." I have seen other athlete's articles, all of which were very similar to Kemp's. From what I can recall, his page had plenty of information detailing who he is and what his significance was (that of a basketball player for a major D1 program, same as many other articles.)
I'm planning on creating articles for the relevant Memphis players (primarily those who are likely going to go on and play in the NBA), and I want to know what kind of information they need to not be deleted. Thanks. Azyrii (talk) 22:32, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Tooth enamel at FAR
[edit]I have nominated Tooth enamel for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.-- Cirt (talk) 01:45, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Built to Spill
[edit]Hey I was quoting the source - "headline tour" (really, headline promotional tour) is different than a "headline concert" - or was the TINE support a series or tour? --Lexein (talk) 12:41, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 13
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Removal proceedings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Immigration and Nationality Act (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 10
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Memphis Tigers men's basketball team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Power forward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Interwebs. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Interwebs. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Interwebs. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |