User talk:Jonathan W

Welcome!

Hello, Jonathan W, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! — Dunc|☺ 14:38, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your to-do list

You might want to move it to your user page User:Jonathan W: That's part of what user pages are for. -- stillnotelf is invisible 02:55, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion, maybe I should. I just thought my to-do list was a bit personal and my User page was supposed to be for the public. Jonathan W 02:57, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the talk page is certainly for the public to leave you messages. If you want it in a more "private" space try creating User:Jonathan W/To do list or something similar; it'll still be wiki but it's unlikely anyone will ever stumble across it. You may want to see Wikipedia:User page. Happy editing, -- stillnotelf is invisible 14:55, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I think I'll just delete the to-do list. I can always write it on paper or something. Jonathan W 15:08, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hangman

Yea, I'd say go ahead and be bold and start a new game :D We need a little more life back in the game! --light darkness^(talk) 03:38, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK Thanks! Jonathan W 13:59, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Sorry its called nickname in your prefs! Mike _{(T C)} 00:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've figuered it out. Jonathan 00:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know how it works out! Mike _{(T C)}

00:25, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My new signature

Jonathan ^talk File:Canada flag 300.png

<font size="2" color=#00FF00 style="background:#884400"> Jonathan</font> 18:37, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm gonna save it here because I can't keep it on the sandbox without it getting deleted Jonathan 02:16, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, hey! I have replied to your post at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Signature, with full info on solving. I hope this all works, and if not just drop me a complaint at my talk page. ;) Good luck! Ian13/talk 18:52, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied again... Ian13/talk 19:07, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved my work on my signature to my personal sandbox. (click here to go there) Jonathan ^talk File:Canada flag 300.png 00:44, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trampoline Safety

You haven't made any changes to the Trampoline page and the neutrality dispute tag is still on the page. Do you have any plans to change it? If not I will be removing the tag unless I hear from you by next week. Dabbler 16:57, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No offence taken or intended. I just rather, tongue in cheek, wanted to point out that competitive trampoline with all the safety precautions allows people to go far beyond what the low-powered backyard trampolines can offer and do it more safely. I monitor trampoline safety as I have a personal interest in ensuring my kids don't get hurt which is why I was able to bring all those links out of my armoury so quickly. Dabbler 23:39, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Links to not forget:

User:Jonathan W/histJan06

Hi, I notice that you've got a set of 'archive' articles up at User:Jonathan W/histJan06 - I like the idea, but I see that the categories are still activated, so the duplicate (and in some cases outdated!) articles are showing up in the regular Wikipedia categories like Category:Dinosaurs. Could I suggest that you deactivate them (by putting a colon before 'Category' in the link)? (see WP:CG, "If you copy an article to your user namespace (for example, as a temporary draft or in response to an edit war) you should decategorize it".) Cheers, Ziggurat 03:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

User:Clamster5/Events Clamster5 00:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A to Z Mysteries

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article A to Z Mysteries, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Shell ^babelfish 11:07, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tiens!

"Tiens!" was commonly used by Hercule Poirot as an epithet (as in "Tiens! Hastings - I, yes, I, Poirot, have been such a fool"), so it's not particularly modern. The online Larousse gives English translations of the epithet "tiens" (from the first person singular of "tenir", not from the posessive "le tien") as various sort of "intensifiers", so

As an expression of surprise: "Tiens, Bruno! Que fais-tu ici?" → "What are you doing here, Bruno?");
As an insistence: "Tiens, le tonnerre grond" → "Listen, it's thundering", though I reckon that might translate more idiomatically as "Strewth, it's thundering".

In general epithets like this are very hard to translate well; I suppose a very literal translation of "tiens" might be "hold" but that would make no sense at all. Replace with "Strewth!", "Heck!", "Ee by gum!" to taste and you might be getting somewhere Disclaimer - Tiens, mon Français est très pauvre Tonywalton ^Talk 20:56, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jonathan W. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jonathan W. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Jonathan W/Myst walkthrough

User:Jonathan W/Myst walkthrough, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jonathan W/Myst walkthrough and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jonathan W/Myst walkthrough during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:51, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrew Lost for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Lost is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Lost until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Johnj1995 (talk) 19:08, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of J. C. Greenburg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J. C. Greenburg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. C. Greenburg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Johnj1995 (talk) 19:22, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]