User talk:Juanjoxy

Your blog

Hi. Please stop inserting links to your blog. All content in Wikipedia must be supported by reference to reliable published sources edited by third parties, such as magazines, academic journals, or newspapers. Thanks, cab (talk) 07:44, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter whose blog it is. The point is that it is not a reliable source (magazine, academic journal, newspaper, government publication, etc.). Please don't reinsert those links. cab (talk) 00:33, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Depends. Is it peer reviewed? Or is it just put on the university's website? cab (talk) 02:38, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to French Peruvian, British Peruvian and Palestinian Peruvian did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by Ccrazymann.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Ccrazymann (talk) 19:17, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Reliable

Hola, al parecer su inglés es muy limitado, por ende le recomiendo la Wikipedia en Español, en cuanto a la referencia que cita, no encuentro aquellas cifras que usted escribe en sus ediciones, además de no ser una fuente fiable, por las siguientes razones:

Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we only publish the opinions of reliable authors, and not the opinions of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. The following specific examples cover only some of the possible types of reliable sources and source reliability issues, and are not intended to be exhaustive. Proper sourcing always depends on context; common sense and editorial judgment are an indispensable part of the process.

The term "published" is most commonly associated with text materials, either in traditional printed format or online. However, audio,video, and multimedia materials that have been recorded then broadcast, distributed, or archived by a reputable third-party may also meet the necessary criteria to be considered reliable source. Like text sources, media sources must be produced by a reliable third-party and be properly cited. Additionally, an archived copy of the media must exist. It is useful but by no means necessary for the archived copy to be accessible via the internet.

Good night.Ccrazymann (talk) 01:03, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]