User talk:Jump Guru

This is Jump Guru's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Cobra

I have done a lot of copyediting on the cobra page but it still needs more. I think that some of the japanese names that you write down are registering as misspells.

anyway... great job! --Fiddlekid (talk) 22:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About that "List of Weekly Shonen Jump"...

I mentioned this in discussion and think I wanted to ask personally since we're the only two on that page: do you really think we need to list every Jump series in existence? Looking over that Japanese list, I've come to the conclusion that outside series that ran a year or longer or may be well known due to either the author (like Zombiepowder to Kubo or Cowa to Toriyama) or somehow broke their way into the US (don't ask me how a short series like Bomber Girl got here) should be on the list. There are a ton of series that went nowhere even early on and to list them could end up as tedious. But I want to ask your opinion before I start making some adjustments to the page. -StrangerAtaru 22:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I`d say the only series that can go on the list is manga in Jump that has been over two years. Or if the manga is well known by the manga-ka just like you said. But if we list all of them that could get way to out of hand. Jump Guru 17:08, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Super Jump (magazine)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Super Jump (magazine), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:28, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comic Champ

I think we need to break Comic Champ off. Its a Korean magazine that has Jump and other stuff in it and if its a series then maybe it just needs its own section. -StrangerAtaru (talk) 16:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tottemo! Luckyman

Why did you create a Luckyman page with little to no information on it? If you needed help you could have asked but all you did was say that it was created by "some guy who isn't Takeshi Obata" and made a one liner that will be deleted. Little is actually known of Luckyman in this country and you probably could have asked for help to make a Wiki for it. (BTW: Hiroshi Gamou is the Luckyman mangaka) -StrangerAtaru (talk) 03:15, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that was my bad. I didn't do a great job. Jump Guru (talk) 04:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I created a monster

Last week, I suggested creating a list for the manga of "Weekly Shonen Sunday" to that Wiki page. Sort of initially thought that they were going to be like us: essential series one year or longer. But somehow the page has got ours beat: not only are they listing all the mangaka (which I started doing at the suggestion of the WSS writer) but also listing a ton of other series, many tied to certain authors. I'm starting to debate if we should follow suit but I keep thinking that it would just end up leading to garbage. Just bringing it up to you in case want to discuss it. (please respond back on my personal talk page, not yours) -StrangerAtaru (talk) 00:23, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Somehow when I talked with Harleyacres, he said that without listing the mangaka, you don't have a train of reference, particularly for many of the more unknown series where neither mangaka or manga have articles in the article. I still think that its going to end up biting us but I decided to take his advice and add the mangaka to the page. I still think that mangawise we should just stick with the standard but I just don't know anymore with the Sunday master list just with so many more series including many really shorter ones that only lasted about a year. -StrangerAtaru (talk) 01:50, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yoichi Takahashi

I do not understand what you're saying because your Japanese is too poor. There's no need to use mechanical translation. I can understand English.--Robeto Hongo (talk) 02:04, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I don't even know whether Yoichi has his website or not. I don't think he does. But there exist several websites on Captain Tsubasa. See Captain Tsubasa#External links.--Robeto Hongo (talk) 18:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shaman King

I didn't go to Jump Festa and I can't speak Japanese, but I heard that Shaman King was going to be completed in Jump SQ. Do you know if this is true? (If you don't feel like finding this out, you don't have to.) Yanra36 (talk) 15:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep! That's right; it is going to be in Jump SQ. Jump Guru (talk) 17:51, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ataru Meaning

Basically the "Ataru" in my name is a reference to Ataru Moroboshi, the lead male character in the anime Urusei Yatsura. Basically its an exclamation that stands for "Watch Out!". -StrangerAtaru (talk) 00:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on my moment. I love UY (what I've seen) and early Ranma 1/2, but later Ranma and IY get on my nerves. -StrangerAtaru (talk) 00:57, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why ask? Don't really read it. (though all that is going through my head is when someone is going to create a Hentai Kamen article so we can link to it :p -StrangerAtaru (talk) 02:18, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No real clue. -StrangerAtaru (talk) 23:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of World 4u

I have nominated World 4u, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World 4u. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mr Senseless (talk) 23:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of World 4u

A tag has been placed on World 4u requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Basketball 110 :) 23:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Jump Square. Thank you. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 21:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:DrawingSmall.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:DrawingSmall.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of U.S. Shonen Jump issues

An editor has nominated List of U.S. Shonen Jump issues, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of U.S. Shonen Jump issues and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which issues of US Shonen Jump do you own? I've suggested in the AFD that the article be merged to a reference list for the use of WP:ANIME. How that works is that people without the magazine ask you to look up in your magazine stuff they want to know about. -Malkinann (talk) 22:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have every issue from 2006 up. – 「ＪＵＭＰＧＵＲＵ」@^{Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia} 16:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be willing to use your collection to assist the anime project in the manner I've described? Please respond on the deletion discussion page - the current thinking is that if no-one is, then knowing what's in which issue is of no use to the anime project. -Malkinann (talk) 23:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox

Why couldn't you fix it instead of reporting it to me..? --staka (T ・C) 20:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:PAGE

You're welcome. I don't know if you actually wanted me to reply to the question.. but I looked at your Contributions and saw that page.. (since it was named as if it were something interesting) --staka (T ・C) 22:38, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your reversions to Jump Square

Hello. I noticed that you have been contributing a majority of the content to the article Jump Square. This is great! However, on two occasions, you removed content that I had contributed. The first time, you simply wrote "Let's just stay with how it is now". This comment did not explain your reasons for removing content from wikipedia by removing my contributions. After I "partially" restored my contribution, you reverted the page again, this time stating "Find a source, the magazine is Shonen". This comment also did not actually address my contribution as my second contribution made no reference to the magazine being part of a demographic other than shonen.

If you are concerned with the factual accuracy of an editor's contributions, please tag it with a ^{[citation needed]} tag or something similar. Generally, on wikipedia, only "harmful" dubious statements, vandalism, or inaccuracies on the biography of a living person are immediately deleted without giving the contributor a chance to address the issue. See WP:EP and WP:PROVEIT for further information. Think of it this way, by the standard you set, most of your contributions to the Jump Square article would be immediately deleted due to lack of citations. Also, your first reversion's comment especially seems contrary to the obligation of all wikipedia editors to allow their work to be edited. See WP:OWN for more details. If you have further issues or questions, message me on my talk page or create a section on Jump Square's discussion page. Thank you.--Finalnight (talk) 04:59, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Where ever you want to put it is fine by me, I just wanted the content in there as I think that is an important (and good) distinguishing part of the magazine, especially compared to the previous Monthly Shonen. Its more mature and "Surpreme Quality".--Finalnight (talk) 20:48, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Put it up for GA review and I will start the GA process on it.--Finalnight (talk) 23:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To put an article up for GA review, see this page. Unfortunately, you can't rerate an article to GA without a review first. Thats what I meant in my previous comment. You can nominate it, then I will review it for GA status.--Finalnight (talk) 05:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jump talk

I want to make a "Ten de Showaru Cupid!" page, but I never got the shipment from Kinokuniya. They claim vol. 2 is out of print and on back order but claim they have vol. 1 in store when I ordered it in December. In other thoughts, I did create a makeshift "Hentai Kamen" page a week or two back after reading chp. 1 (want to read the whole thing) and I may or may not do something similar now that I found a Youtube page with "Stop!! Hibari-Kun!" (which I doubt I'll get around to watching but it is a Jump series) Meanwhile, I see you approve of the '68-'79 template...though I know I don't have every crucial Jump series of the era, I needed something that probably would work with what we've got. I'll make the template official, then and start putting it on the appropriate pages. -StrangerAtaru (talk) 22:28, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know we need references, I just get so lazy on Wiki referencing that I just ignore or forget about it. BTW: I started a different (slightly) kind of template for the 80s Jump series...it looks rather big for the moment but I'm mostly doing it by year and starting with the manga we have articles for. If you want, I can put in the other series as placeholders but realize most of them will never probably have an article in the English Wiki. -StrangerAtaru (talk) 22:48, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- My thing is what exactly they want for resources. I mean come on: you can't take certain things since they are common knowledge. BTW: anything you want me to add or adjust before I create the template and start putting the 80s list on the webpages? -StrangerAtaru (talk) 22:56, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:V Jump.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:V Jump.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:24, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jump Square

The article Jump Square you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Jump Square for things needed to be addressed. Finalnight (talk) 18:07, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You keep asking me to help with the article, but the rules state a GA reviewer cannot be a major contributor to an article.--Finalnight (talk) 18:11, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has delisted Jump Square as a GA article in what I view to be an improper fashion and I suggest you take it to Wikipedia:Good article reassessment or abuse reporting.--Finalnight (talk) 01:18, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:VIZ company (Press Releases)

Template:VIZ company (Press Releases) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:13, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, Jump Guru, please be more careful in your work with templates. Your changes to Template:Shueisha were extremely inappropriate. We do not put images in templates, and your changes made it horribly huge and useless. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:20, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is huge, I was going to make a scroller for it. I'm very sorry, I thought it looked alot better, I put hours of work into it. – 「ＪＵＭＰＧＵＲＵ」@^{Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia} 20:24, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated it for deletion as well. Shueisha's list of publications is just too large to be done as a template. The category is a better method for linking its works. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:27, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I actually used this template as a base: Template:Jmyth navbox long. – 「ＪＵＭＰＧＵＲＵ」@^{Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia} 21:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's a rare exception, not the rule (and it doesn't need an image either, but that's anotehr issue). It also is a template for a completely different type of content. It is not appropriate for a company template. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 21:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jump Square

Being sourced does not mean it belongs. Its unnecessary and excessive detail. Wikipedia is not a magazine catalog, nor a publication history. A list of the main series is appropriate. Lists of one-shots and single previews is not. The article has an excessive glut of unnecessary information. I've now cleaned out most of it. Still needs more work, but the article is now at least at a more manageable size and actually somewhat readable. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:27, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~ahem~ its considered rude to edit an article while its tagged as inuse by another editor. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:58, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry! : ( – 「ＪＵＭＰＧＵＲＵ」@^{Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia} 01:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Series in Jump SQ.

Template:Series in Jump SQ. has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:39, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do NOT remove a TfD notice from a template. It will be removed when the TfD is closed by an administrator. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comic Champ

Great! Ironically, I don't know much Korean, even though I'm spearheading the big manhwa cleanup & expansion, LOL. I've been so busy with organizational work, I haven't had much time to actually research or create content yet. I've run across some good stuff in my wanderings thus far, and I'll try to relocate it for you. I'm also going to post about this on the World Comics talk page, so I urge you to put it on your watchlist for a while and chime in. We do have some native speakers involved with the project, but things are just so disjointed right now, and I know one guy is super busy. From what I've been told, comics-related content is not well developed on the Korean Wikipedia yet, so it's not a super great resource. But, check out the talk page and I'll post what I've got ASAP. Thanks for making this effort! :) --hamu♥hamu (TALK) 23:43, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Hello. I don't mean to sound unfriendly, but could you possibly change your signature? Your signature appears to contain unicode (or other special symbols) that is difficult to view on many browsers, and it's sometimes rather confusing to see a bunch of hollow boxes where one would expect to see a username. Cheers, and thanks in advance! --Mizu onna sango15/^Discuss 06:25, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo! : ) – 「ＪＵＭＰＧＵＲＵ」@^{Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia} 15:09, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's my new signature: – JUMP GURU@^{Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia} 15:53, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :-) Good day, --Mizu onna sango15/^Discuss 23:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Comic Champ revisited

Hey, in between killing myself with other stuff, I've been trying to do a little research here & there on Comic Champ, and I'm starting to wonder about a few things. I've done an enormous amount of searching, and while there are a lot of English sites that say Comic Champ is the Korean version of WSJ, none of them have references and I'd be willing to say they got the info from Wikipedia. The info has been on Wikipedia, in one form or another, since 2006 at least, and some of the related claims have been ludicrous, such as that Daiwon's Issue magazine was the Korean version of Shojo Beat. An editor last summer noted on Daiwon's talk page that most of the info on it was straight-up wrong and asked for help from WP Korea, but nothing ever got done about it. Comic Champ carries mostly domestic titles, actually, with only a few titles from Shonen Jump, and I think it even carries titles from other Japanese publishers, as well. Some Shonen Jump titles are carried by entirely other publishers, too, like Seoul Munhwasa has Bleach). There is no mention of a relationship between the any of Daiwon's magazines and any Shueisha magazines that I can find on the Korean or Japanese wikis. I got sucked into believing it "must" be true because of the redirect you created last fall from Comic Champ to WSJ. So, yeah, let's put our heads together and figure out if we can get a reliable source that CC is a version of SJ. What was your source when you created the redirect? Because I can't find a darn thing, LOL! --hamu♥hamu (TALK) 07:36, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I'm starting to think the same. Let's just say it isn't, because I made that redirect when I was a amateur. I honestly don't think it is. – J U M P G U R U @^{Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia} 01:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

		The Special Barnstar
		I'm awarding you this barnstar because of your wonderful enthusiasm for working on anime and magazine articles, which has resulted in some great revitalization of interest in those articles, some great clean up work at Weekly Shōnen Jump, the long overdue creation of Shonen Jump, and the drafting of a new MoS for our magazine articles. I hope you will continue to learn and improve from criticisms and corrections, and not let them discourage you as you continue your journey as a Wikipedian! -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 21:46, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ore wa Mita

As I said in the prod, it's basically noteworthy as part of the entire Barefoot Gen story, and belongs (IMHO) as part of that article. The article you posted is mostly an overlong plot summary. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:43, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response

I need cheering up.Kitty53 (talk) 03:39, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously. I need cheering up. I've had too many articles put up for deletion, and a barnstar is the only thing that will cheer me up, now.Kitty53 (talk) 04:01, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello?Kitty53 (talk) 04:10, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*ahem* Kitty, I know you've been told before, multiple times in fact, that it is rude and inappropriate to beg other editors to give you barnstars to "cheer you up." Barnstars are given because people choose to give them, and most because they are earned, not because someone demands one or thinks they need one to feel better about themselves. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 04:18, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So you just want a award? Y'know, i've made a huge effort on all the Jump articles, and i've gotten one award, which i'm pretty dang proud about! : ) You, you've gotten over ten awards for your wining in complaining.....that makes me sick. >_< – J U M P G U R U @^{Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia} 05:27, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge suggestion of Bakuman chapters

Regarding your suggestion, I think it's more convenient to just keep the chapter article separate. Most or all of the manga pages have their own separate chapter articles. There aren't many chapters for this manga now, but in the future there will be. Myominane (talk) 22:50, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's unlikely, and I don't know what happens when a series does get canceled, but I'm guessing we'll merge the chapters with the main article then. Myominane (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 04:21, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since this is another collaboration between Tsugumi Ohba and Takeshi Obata, I don't think it has a high chance of getting pulled. We saw how Death Note did, and well, before Hikaru no Go, Obata didn't really have a hit, but he's been doing good after that. Myominane (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 23:00, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:ShonenBook mag.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ShonenBook mag.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:57, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Talk:Gintama a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is considered undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Being fair and leaving you both this little note. *gentle bop for that* :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:25, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

English names

In two articles, Karakuridôji Ultimo and Muhyo and Roji's Bureau of Supernatural Investigation, you made edits that removed the English title from the nihongo template, put it in front followed by "is the English title of"[1][2]. I have reverted both of those edits as they were not correct per our guidelines at all. The whole purpose of the Nihongo template is to have English title (kanji title, romanji title) without extraneous text. That its the English title is explicit in it being first. Okay? :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:32, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. What I was trying to explain on the Muhyo page was that "Rōjī" is a dirivative for Rosie or Rozy. : ) I'll just add a lit. translation. — J U M P G U R U ^■TALK■ 00:46, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't really needed though. A lit. translation is only needed in cases of big differences, like Tramps Like Us or the like :P And speaking of that article, I seriously should give that page some love. Such a great series with barely above a stub for an article. :P-- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:52, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kimi wa Petto? I've seen that at Kinokuniya. Is it good? barely heard anything about it. — J U M P G U R U ^■TALK■ 01:04, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I really enjoyed it. Its not shojo, but josei, and focuses on a workaholic woman who thinks she has a perfect boyfriend, until she unexpectedly finds real love in the form of a dancer sleeping in a box that she takes in as a human pet. :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:18, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is Josei, I saw the article. Is it released in the States? If it is, it doesn't mention it in the article. — J U M P G U R U ^■TALK■ 04:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it was released by Tokyopop as Tramps Like Us -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 04:12, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Toriko

Seeing as how you're the big Jump guy, I just added the manga series Toriko to Wikipedia. It's pretty cool and it's already gotten pretty popular. So, yeah... Conanfan1412 (talk) 23:51, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Conanfan1412. : ) You made a Toriko article? Hm. looks like it got off to nice little start. I'll help you with the page. Right now i'm redoing the Speed Racer article, a IP destroyed it right after I revamped it. : P I've never really talked to you, I know you used several of my userboxes though. : ) — J U M P G U R U ^■TALK■ 23:59, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I do like those userboxes (^_^) Just looked at the Speed Racer article, and I'd like to say it's awesome. I'm glad you've added more of the original Japanese parts to it. I've always preferred to call Speed Racer, Mach GoGoGo since that's it's original Japanese title. Conanfan1412 (talk) 04:24, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I call it that too. ^_^ However I use Speed Racer to people who only know it by that name. I really wanna get the DMP boxset, but I don't have that kind of money right now. : P Anyway, I just added the Toriko article to my wathlist, too bad Mitsutoshi did what he did (if you get what I mean). : ( I read his manga alot, read his last one which was formerly in Weekly Jump but got cancelled, and then moved to Super Jump. I get both magazine so I read the whole series. :D — J U M P G U R U ^■TALK■ 15:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think Mitsutoshi has a really good imagination and great artwork, but I don't agree with what he did. I only have respect for him because of his manga, not because of him himself. Conanfan1412 (talk) 23:16, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes he has a great imagination. Who would have though of making a manga about finding the ultimate food ingrediants. There's only manga about making bread! Toriko makes me feel really hungry. : P I will be finding sources for Toriko. — J U M P G U R U ^■TALK■ 01:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What?

How is "haitus" an On Kanji? Do you mean "hiatus", or "haitsu"? Moocowsrule (talk) 06:30, 6 November 2008 (UTC)moocowsrule[reply]

LOL. I just haven't been doing that for a while so it's "On hiatus". : ) Now that you mention it I'll be starting it again. — J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 21:34, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well then why does it say "On hiatus"? I tried fixing it for you, but I didn't find the text "On hiatus"... of course it's probably some fancy code... which I don't know... T~T わwa らra うu Smile! 04:12, 20 November 2008 (UTC)moocowsrule[reply]

XD I love how you used the Kanji for "benefits" for "Constipated face". (益) わwa らra うu Smile! 04:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC)moocowsrule[reply]

Plus if you want the tilde sign to appear while using MS Gothic or some other Japanese font, you should use a Japanese tilde (～)... わwa らra うu Smile! 04:18, 20 November 2008 (UTC)moocowsrule[reply]

Thanks. LOL constipated face. I have a question, why do you put the tildes and write your name after it? Example: ~~~~moocowsrule. — J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 16:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why would I know? Ask the people who made Wikipedia... Or are you talking about me specifically? In which case I'd respond by calling you a stalker. :D --わwa らra うu Smile! 01:38, 21 November 2008 (UTC)moocowsrule[reply]

I'm not a stalker. : P I was just curious because after your signature I keep seeing your name written again. : P — J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 01:40, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is odd. But then how do you take it off? I mean I could do two edits... but that would be annoying. わwa らra うu Smile! 02:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)moocowsrule[reply]

XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD I FEEL SO STUPID!!! I thought you had to write your name after you type in the four little ~~~~ thingys... You just have to type the four tildes... わwa らra うu Smile! 02:19, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't feel stupidos. You just made a mistake. : P — J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 17:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol it took me a while to figure that one out... I should probably read things better...er わwa らra うu Smile! 00:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikia and vandalism

1. Remember that the Wikia is controlled by the Wikimedia Foundation, so it should be okay to link to the Wikias (OTHER Wikis, not in most cases) 2. Please do not refer to disputes over ELs as vandalism - See Wikipedia:Vandalism WhisperToMe (talk) 00:22, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The wikia page was a direct copy of the Gantz Wikipedia page and had a whole ton of red links + it is created by a fan. Why shouldn't I delete it? Who cares if it was controlled by the Wikimedia Foundation? That's like if I put a bootlegged Chinese copy of Dragon Ball into my all-official manga collection. — J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 00:44, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is not always okay to link to other wikias. Wikia is considered separate from Wikimedia, and, are not automatically granted some magic reprieve from being evaluated the against the WP:EL guidelines. As it is, most Wikia sites completely fail those guidelines, particularly the series fan wikias. Anyone can create a wikia, they are self-published, and most are controlled by only a handful of fans who do NOT make any effort to follow copyright guidelines or the like. Only a select few Wikia currently meet the external linking guidelines. The removal of the link to Gantz was correct and fully within Wikipedia editing guidelines. No comment on it being called vandalism. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I continued the discussion here Wikipedia_talk:External_links#When_is_linking_to_a_Wikia_acceptable.3F to see if I could get more feedback. I may also link to it from the Anime wikiproject talk page. WhisperToMe (talk) 08:59, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you just link to blogspot too? >_O — J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 16:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:World manga

Rather than just send this template to TfD, I'm going to ask you to please self delete this template. It is completely inappropriate for your attempted usage, violating infobox usage guidelines and all relevant Manuals of Style. I can almost guarantee it will receive no support from the the Anime and manga project for use in any article. The infobox is not for declaring other language titles, nor, are they particularly relevant nor notable. If sourceable, and the titles were in English, it should be noted in prose only, and normally, not with any sort of template like this.-- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 18:31, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm truly sorry. I tagged it with a TfD. It will be tagged until I can change it to something that can actually be usefull in an article. Does that sound good? — J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 18:43, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, since you are its creator, a CSD would be more appropriate. And thanks :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 18:48, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stan Lee template

It is honestly my belief, and probably that of many others, that this template covers too broad a topic to justify its existence. Lee dabbled in and created many titles, and he cannot have a template just as other prolific comic book creators could. Linking Stan in each template for his creations has worked fine so far, without clouding the bottom of the page with links to more distantly related subjects. I advise you take this up with the Comics Project. Lee is the man, but Kirby is the king and you could justify him having a template based on the same logic. Alientraveller (talk) 21:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. Yes. You'd think i'd know after the several million times you said that it's too broad of a template in your edit summary. Kirby? Is that the real problem? Sure, i'll make a template for him. I'll start a talk with the comics project. — J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 23:11, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Query

Concerning an edit that was made to Astro Boy, isn't there a link that could replace that bolded term? Please reply on your talk page. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:18, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm...the magazine Shōnen doesn't have an article, that was a historical magazine from the 20's. I thought that it was published in Shōnen Sunday, that's the manga line it's in. — J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 06:22, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Think we should use Shōnen Sunday? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Or remove it altogether? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:55, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should use Sunday. : ) Linking. — J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 22:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meh

You know about me and Ebaumworld? So what else is new...the less said about it the better. -StrangerAtaru (talk) 01:49, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Omoshiro Book.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Omoshiro Book.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Stan Lee

Template:Stan Lee has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:37, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sigh* Yeah I noticed...just delete it. I don't care. : ( J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 18:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Marc Weidenbaum

A tag has been placed on Marc Weidenbaum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:32, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well now that you cut off half the article I guess there's no use for it now. : ( – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 02:39, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The part I removed had nothing to do with a person's biography, it was more a "celebrity sighting" kind of thing. See WP:BIO for the notability requirements for people, which are pretty tough. I had considered doing an article on him as part of the Viz Magazine stuff, but didn't find that he could meet the notability requirements, nor that any kind of real biography could ever be written for him. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:42, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, is that what you erased? Well that makes sense then. : ) – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 02:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Marc Weidenbaum

I have nominated Marc Weidenbaum, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Weidenbaum. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:24, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Letter Bee issue.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Letter Bee issue.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:10, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Youth's World.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Youth's World.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:08, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

HAPPY HOLIDAYS. moocowsrule 02:56, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, Thank you. I noticed you changed your signature! : ) – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 06:15, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yea. It's more Christmas-y. :D moocowsrule 06:58, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

XD The comment I left myself at the top of my userpage gets me every time moocowsrule 07:00, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, that's really good. I fell for it. : P – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 16:29, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What, no Christmas greeting for me? Now I feel left out... T~T —Dino guy 1000 17:56, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I forgot! moocowsrule 18:42, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

XD I think I'll take that off my page now. I always go up to click on the link, then realize how stupid I am... moocowsrule 18:54, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry for the wait. Merry Christmas Dinoguy! Oh my gosh, you guys have to see this video. A knockoff of Kung Fu Panda. While you're at go see the other videos by Video Brinquedo. – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 19:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WOW. What a ripoff of Disney! moocowsrule 19:43, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think Kung Fu Panda is DreamWorks. – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 19:45, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol whatever. See this comment somebody left on their YouTube page.

Hehe, Are you kidding me?You just ripped off Robots. I can't wait to see your shity [sic] trailer about talking toys. But you know, Your shiity [sic] movie trailers are actually good for parody's and Youtube Poops. Also,if you see that your videos get bad 1 or 2star ratings, and your videos get lotsa [sic] hate comments, why the fuck do you keep it up? I won't see your movies if it was free.And yes, You came up with a game called "Guess The Movie That Just Got Ripped Off".

XD "Guess The Movie That Just Got Ripped Off". moocowsrule 19:53, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL Don Don Haha! \(>o<)/ – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 20:06, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays! (Part 2)

ムーカオズルール^{(Talk to Moo)} 08:16, 23 December 2008 (UTC) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow![reply]

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Gee, thankz! – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 18:02, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I like the WikiSanta! So what's up moocow? – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 18:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not much. Pretty much just relaxing. We have a bunch of guests staying at our house for Christmas and both our spare rooms are filled up. I have like nowhere to practice any of my instruments except my extremely messy room and it sucks D: ムーカオズルール^{(Talk to Moo)} 19:28, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, my room is really clean. I think mostly cuz my floor to ceiling manga collection is in there. :-P I never really asked, what manga do you have? – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 19:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly Naruto (the Shadow Box, a few loose ones), FMA (Like 5), Bleach (like 1 D:) and like a crapload of SJ. I was gonna buy some Japanese ones in Anchorage and Seattle but I decided not to waste my money (I couldn't understand ANY Japanese then). ムーカオズルール^{(Talk to Moo)} 19:39, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about you, Jump? What manga do you have? (before you ask, I only have a bunch of SJ (you oughta list your issues there, too, Moocows), despite how much I've actually read... T~T) —Dino guy 1000 20:22, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have subscriptions to all the Jump magazines including the English and almost every English SJ manga. I also have easily over 200 Jump Comics and Young Jump Comics. I plan to get some Jump manga in German too. – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 20:31, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have a lot... XD that's all I know. ムーカオズルール^{(Talk to Moo)} 20:33, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And Japanese, as well? In any case, that still a hella lot of magazine issues... Maybe you should list yourself at the magazine archive, too... ;) —Dino guy 1000 20:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well yeah, I'm planning to be the biggest (and probobly only *.*) Jump collector. On the magazine archive it only has the English magazines, what should I do? : P – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 21:27, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure Animage is Japanese, isn't it? In any case, just make a new section if necessary, copying and modifying the layout from one of the original sections (or in the case of Shonen Jump, just add a row with your name and issues (haha) underneath mine). —Dino guy 1000 18:39, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Secret page

It's a trick page - try again. :) —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 00:10, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just checked through your whole navigation. Tee hee,

User:La Pianista/barnstar

Kay now. Try to find mine!! – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 00:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done :) —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 00:31, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in S-Manga.Net

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on S-Manga.Net, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because S-Manga.Net is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting S-Manga.Net, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 01:40, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:YouTube

XD That's not me. That's just some random person... ムーカオズルール^{(Talk to Moo)} 03:47, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wuh huh? LOL I just saw a bunch of comments that said stuff about cows. I feel really dumb! Anyway, I got a YouTube account. – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 05:36, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Baba (honorific)

I noted your recent edit to the page, and was wondering if you could comment back here concerning a few things. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you kindly share your thoughts over here? Now Bkonrad wants to have the ref guideline altered. I'm about to drop in my two cents in a few. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Altered?!? He's joking! Coming in. – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 18:29, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since it seems like there won't be much opposition, what do you propose we write in the guideline? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on your wiki-demeanour

Hi Jump Guru, I'm not particularly impressed with your attitude here and I've also mentioned it at SandyGeorgia's talk page, since it relates to her theme of giving primacy to the "encyclopedic" contributors here on the wiki. Basically, I don't think that achieving GA status gives you a platform to berate other editors. Your comments are of course welcome. Franamax (talk) 05:31, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interestingly, I had just read this same discussion coming from a different page, and have to tell you, Jump Guru, that I was extraordinarily disappointed at the belittling way in which you treated other editors. Further, I do not believe that Jimmy Wales ever said that any article with fewer than ten references should be "brutally deleted"; please give a reference when you are attributing such a statement to a person. I hope you will reconsider the manner in which you comport yourself. Risker (talk) 06:35, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I must echo what Franamax and Risker have said. Jayjg ^(talk) 06:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Jump, but I have to agree here. That was really uncalled for and out of line. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 07:02, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have just read through the thread which I read without any prompting from anyone. I have to say that I'm in agreement with the other comments here: a very disappointing tone to your messages. It would be good if you felt you should make a statement of apology about it, thus reaffirming your commitment to the principles of WP:AGF and WP:No personal attacks. DDStretch (talk) 07:48, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so deeply sorry. – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 18:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry, please forgive me. That's not what I meant to do. Am I blocked from editing or something? If I am, I understand. – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 18:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, Jump Guru, you aren't blocked, and I am relieved to see that you've taken these concerns to heart. An apology in the thread, and to the editor who was on the receiving end, would not be out of place here, however. It's a new year, and a good time to start off with a clean slate and perhaps a different perspective. Risker (talk) 18:31, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gone

Hi Jump Guru, I noticed Hamuhamu seems to have gone away and some images are being removed after notice on her page. Hopefully I saved the Banya: The Explosive Delivery Man jpg file (not really knowing how to do it properly, though). I wonder if you are involved in any of these comics articles and their identifying images and if you could help? Julia Rossi (talk) 01:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much. yes it is like going to a funeral and I miss her "bounce" – it was a shock to see how long she's been gone. Maybe she is studying hard. Luckily you are still here, and if I can be useful (though I only have English), please let me know, : ) Julia Rossi (talk) 21:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I looked up her user contribs the other day out of curiosity, and couldn't believe how long it's been since her last edit... I hope she returns at some point, she was pretty fun to talk to... 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{(Dinoguy1000)} 19:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I know, and she helped the wiki alot. No one has er helped the manhwa articles in a long time. : ( – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 19:11, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re

KDL is of lesser quality than most GAs, and I've been planning to improve it. I responded to your complaints of MB, which are entirely untrue or trivial. ANd Katamari, well, let's ask ourselves this - if you're right, the FAR was wrong. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 22:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:S Manga logo.gif)

You've uploaded File:S Manga logo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:S Manga main.jpg)

You've uploaded File:S Manga main.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:53, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Shueisha logo.gif)

You've uploaded File:Shueisha logo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:12, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hayate X Blade

I am sorry, but I have no idea what your problem is. There is nothing in WP:MOS that forbids having all the plot information under a single heading. What are you talking about, and why can't we just do it that way? Not to mention that you're merely citing a guideline, not policy. I usually wouldn't get so uppity about it, but when I'm told I can't do something for a reason that makes zero sense, then I tend to get a little defensive.--十八 03:23, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said: It also doesn't say not to vandalise pages, but we sure don't do that. – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 17:12, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a valid argument and you know it. I was not vandalizing, nor was I making unconstructive edits. I was merely formatting the article into a more logical construction, but I see you and logic just don't mix.--十八 06:00, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying you're vandalising the page, i'm saying that the page can't list EVERYTHING, it ony lists the IMPORTANT stuff. Did you expect it to say, "Oh yeah, you also can't put everything under one section entitled "Characters" which only one user does". That's what I mean't by saying, "It also doesn't say not to vandalise pages, but we sure don't do that". I'm not calling you a vandal. : P In the bible it doesn't say that we can't smoke weed. – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 17:26, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, your arguments are not valid. We have featured articles that put all the plot info under a single section because the subsections all have to do with the plot. Why else do we put all the media/adaptations under a single header? Don't be all "oh, Juhachi's the only one who does this so he must be wrong", because I've seen this technique used all over Wikipedia, and I was merely doing what I thought right.--十八 09:56, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hayate X Blade. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Let's remember WP:BRD. Bold formatting change made that doesn't meet guidelines, so please discuss instead of edit warring. Ask for additional input from the project if more opinions are needed. Note, I'm warning BOTH editors here with 3 reverts for Juhachi, 4 Jump Guru, no warnings left so no actual report will be filed at at this time. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

D'oh, sorry. Need to keep in mind 3RR. : ) – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 17:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suntory

The Suntory Museum only housed them for a short period of time. Works of art move around. A lot. That's what they do. The places that are listed at present are the *permanent homes* of the artwork, in addition to the most famous replica, which is housed at the temple that actually *owns* the artwork. Bueller 007 (talk) 20:17, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you are capable of reading Japanese, then go ahead and check them out. Of course, I assume that anyone who knows Japanese would know exactly what dictionaries I'm talking about.

Kojien - 猿・兎・蛙などの遊びを擬人的に描いた甲巻と動物の生態を描いた****乙巻は覚猷の筆と伝えるが確かな根拠はない****。

Daijirin - *****筆者を鳥羽僧正覚猷とする説に確証はない。*****

Encyclopedia Nipponica -　*****筆者は鳥羽僧正覚猷（1053—1140）と伝称されるが確証はなく*****、また四巻はそれぞれ制作時期と筆を異にしている。

I have computerized editions, so I can't give you page numbers, ISSNs, etc. The *exact* article names are 鳥獣人物戯画 for Kojien, 鳥獣戯画 for Daijirin and 鳥獣人物戯画 for EN. Yahoo does not specify which version of EN they are using, although I assume that if it is not custom-made, it is based on the 2nd print edition. Bueller 007 (talk) 06:17, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article merging

Since you suggested that I Love Katamari and Katamari Damacy Mobile should be merged, could you put your rationale/input at the I Love Katamari talk page located here? Thanks. Brianreading (talk) 04:15, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Chouju tugwar.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Chouju tugwar.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Individuals at Baba (honorific)

I think we can safely remove that horrid list. Only User:Bkonrad felt that it should be kept whilst three people were pretty much okay without it. Thoughts? Please reply below, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else just added their support. Are you still a part of this? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 01:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wah, I totally forgot you sent me this!! I'm sorry. : P *bwann...* Yeah, I'm a part. – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 01:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I already supported, did you notice. /: ) – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 01:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I just wanted to know if you can take down the list yourself. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. : ) – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 03:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Hope that's the end of that ;) Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question, can you see if someone's edit to Ultimo was correct? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It should be fine. : ) – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 01:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bakuman WJ 01.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Bakuman WJ 01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGa^talk 02:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

The online/offline thing is this : {{User status | status = offline | user = | reason = | position = | float = | bt = | br = | bb = | bl = | useimage = | images = }}

Edit "offline" to say "online" when you are online, and vice versa.

The text and picture you see is an editnotice - it is a page that you write and it shows up over the editing box while editing. To make one for your user page, you would do it as User:Jump Guru/Editnotice, and User talk:Jump Guru/Editnotice. Hope this answers your questions, and happy editing. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 02:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For a semiautomated status changer, you may also want to look at Qui (the one I use ;) ). 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{(Dinoguy1000)} 04:30, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chouju postalstamp.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chouju postalstamp.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Miniclip

Because the link is present in the infobox. That is why. E_dog95'^{Hi '} 00:14, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Shōnen Sekai?

Unicode for what? moocowsrule^{talk to moo} 01:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, that didn't make any sense... : P I don't really know. – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 02:04, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Cobra vol 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cobra vol 1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Cobra

I've seen the anime, but not read the manga. You may want to ask people at WP:ANIME project for help; admins like me are just regular users with some extra tools, but not necessarily more content knowledge on certain subjects. I'll certainly review the anime plot and correct it if I can.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 05:30, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Random Question

Hey jump guru, how do I hide secret pages? --Fiddlekid (talk) 19:00, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you put the messages at the bottom? : ) Thank you. Anyway, you can hide them by making them white like this: secret. You can make it white or black and make it hidden by making it inside a small letter like this: i. : ) – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 22:56, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A BarnLoli for ya

		The Manga and Anime BarnLoli Award
		I hereby award this BarnLoli to Jump Guru for this users outstanding work in Anime and Manga related articles. --Fiddlekid (talk) 08:00, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(p.s, Don't you think that you should delete some of the older discussions to make more room? it's getting kind of crammed...)

Yeah, I need to archive it. : ) Thanks a ton! – J U M P G U R U ^{■ask㋐㋜㋗■} 16:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Barchetta

Hi, judging from the archive.org pages you linked, Barchetta is written as 바르케타 in Korean Hangul. Thanks. :) --Kjoonlee 01:21, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Space Adventure Cobra

Reverting my edits after all the trouble I went to. Thank you very much. --Marktreut (talk) 12:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, can we discuss this? I did try to improve it as per the copyedit request. Let's try to find a solution. Please get in touch. Thanks.--Marktreut (talk) 16:45, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1) I re-wrote the plot section in order to make it a little clearer to read. 2) I divided the character section between heroes and villains just as a way to simplify categorising. 3) Much of the rest - the various form of media, critisisms etc. - were left untouched aside from a few spelling errors and some grammatical corrections. The extra contributions that I put in came from my watching the anime and reading the original manga. In both of these Jane Royal is a bounty hunter and Catherine is not part of the Milky Way Patrol. And now, as ever, my contribution to wikipedia has made me public enemy #1. Thanks alot.--Marktreut (talk) 00:48, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since when is submitting Plot Summaries and Character Descriptions "original research" that requires to be based on the analysis of a third-party instead of your own observations based on what you read and watched? These restrictive rules are making Wikipedia going down the tubes. It's no fun anymore - which is sad.--Marktreut (talk) 13:01, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You did not just submit plot summary and character descriptions, you rearranged the article in an inappropriate fashion. Go read your talk page and the comments there about why your edits were not appropriate. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 13:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About the 'dragons' image from the Choju-Giga

Hello. I'm a passer-by from Japan and just happened to find this image.

I'd like to point out; actually, these creatures in the image are lions (Japanese: 獅子; shishi), not dragons. (more precisely, "獅子" is an imagination over Indian lions imagined by ancient Chinese and Japanese, who had never met real live lions.)

For reference: ["獅子" looked up in the Google Image: http://images.google.com/images?hl=ja&q=%E7%8D%85%E5%AD%90])

Compare with: ["龍" (dragon) looked up in the Google Image: http://images.google.com/images?hl=ja&q=%E9%BE%8D]

Could you correct the file name and the caption on the image in the article Chōjū-jinbutsu-giga?

Thank you. 61.114.200.134 (talk) 00:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Barefoot Gen volume one.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Barefoot Gen volume one.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mashmakhan

Hey Jump Guru, thanks for the kind words :). I'm just glad you didn't think I was running behind you trying to muck up all your hard work. May the truth be known, I'm actually pretty excited that someone has finally taken interest in filling out some of the Mashmakhan name-space, and eager to apply any little tweaks that might help the articles be presented as issue-free as possible. Sadly, most of what I know of Mashmakhan is what I've read. I am however, a very huge Jerry Mercer fan, and always enjoy being involved with articles that bear his name. Happy editing Jump Guru... I look forward to crossing wiki-paths with you often :). -- WikHead (talk) 19:44, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you?

In the page List of series run in Shōnen Book you made a | revision of 22:17, 14 October 2008 by adding 5 ref tags that resulted in 5 new cite errors. Could you go back and fill out the full source information? Thanks. 75.69.0.58 (talk) 22:24, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please update your status with WP:VG

Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:

Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

—WikiProject Video games (delivery by xenobot 03:32, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scribner's Magazine update

Hello, Jump Guru. You have new messages at Collectonian's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

References

I have fixed a few mistaken references in List of series run in Shōnen Book, and added three more by interference. But there is one that I can not solve: August 1959. Because isue 12 is September and issue 11 is July, so there is no room for an August issue. Could you please look into this? Thank you, Debresser (talk) 12:50, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Em, thank of course for fixing this, but... what is going on with the "issue" parameter? Could you try to explain at least to me? Debresser (talk) 17:17, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, simply, which issue of the magazine was August? Debresser (talk) 19:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incredibly busy with fixing what needs fixing. :) Debresser (talk) 20:15, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to get things done with templates and categories without being an admin. Debresser (talk) 20:22, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strange. I thought issue 20 was May 1060. I don't know about Shōnen Book. I just ran into a broken references notice. :) Debresser (talk) 20:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another gentle ping from WP:VG

Dear Jump Guru,

You are receiving this message because either [[Category:WikiProject Video games members]] or {{User WPVG}} is somewhere in your userspace, and you are currently listed in the "Unknown" section on the project's member list.

The member list is meant to provide a clearer picture of active membership. It is recommended that you update your status if you plan to regularly:

Edit video game-related pages in the Article namespace
Participate in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Members listed in the "Unknown" section will be removed from the membership list and category at the end of January 2010. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

Sincerely, the Video Games WikiProject (delivery by xenobot 21:51, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Jump Guru! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Naoki Konno - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
June (singer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:50, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ShoDojo logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ShoDojo logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:18, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tatsuma Ejiri

The article Tatsuma Ejiri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject of this article is a living person. Per WP:BLP such an article must be referenced to reliable sources. My search for sources didn't find any significant coverage from reliable sources and doesn't appear to meet any of the criteria in WP:BIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 12:02, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of TāTan Check

The article TāTan Check has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While this asserts his notability, I can find no references supporting this. Doesn't appear to meet inclusion guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 08:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow.

Well, I know Wiki isn't a "chat site", but I haven't been on in a while, and I really don't know if you remember me. I was just wondering what happened with Collectonian? I was on Wiki for the first time in like, a year probably, and was wanting to say hi to everyone. But a lot of people seem mostly to be retired. Anyway, try and get back, and I'll try and get on more and do more editing. moocowsrule^{talk to moo} 00:05, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I should clarify, if you don't know. Her user and talk page got deleted, I'm assuming she has a new account? But on the talk page it said something about to end harassment. I was just wondering what exactly happened if you knew. moocowsrule^{talk to moo} 00:09, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Jump Guru/Secret Page

User:Jump Guru/Secret Page, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jump Guru/Secret Page and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jump Guru/Secret Page during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Cunard (talk) 09:02, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Naoki Konno

The article Naoki Konno has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I could not find any reliable sources to establish the notability of this manga artist.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Since the nominator failed to notify you... —Farix (t | c) 17:21, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hiroyuki Kaidō for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hiroyuki Kaidō is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiroyuki Kaidō until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. joe decker ^{talk to me} 19:15, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Jump Guru/Sandbox

User:Jump Guru/Sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jump Guru/Sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jump Guru/Sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 22:03, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Last Gasp.gif author information

File:Last Gasp.gif needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Last Gasp.gif appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Jump Guru}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. CüRlyTüRkey^Talk_Contribs 22:40, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Smelly picture.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Smelly picture.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:45, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Curtis Comic logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Curtis Comic logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 01:20, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Toccio Angel.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Toccio Angel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:10, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tatsuya Endō for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tatsuya Endō is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatsuya Endō until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 19:59, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Jump Guru/Sandbox

User:Jump Guru/Sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jump Guru/Sandbox (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jump Guru/Sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 22:10, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of items associated with Weekly Shōnen Jump for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of items associated with Weekly Shōnen Jump is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of items associated with Weekly Shōnen Jump until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 14:13, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jump Guru. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kōsuke Masuda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kōsuke Masuda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kōsuke Masuda until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:12, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hajime Kazu

The article Hajime Kazu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG & WP:BIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 15:45, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ratatoing-dvd.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ratatoing-dvd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Replaceable fair use File:Santa Inoue signature.png

Thanks for uploading File:Santa Inoue signature.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:51, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Grammy Museum logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Grammy Museum logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Samurai Usagi

The article Samurai Usagi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:08, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daisuke Kadokuni

The article Daisuke Kadokuni has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable person that fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO for lack of significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:49, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hobby's Jump for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hobby's Jump is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hobby's Jump until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Palmer Clive Alive (talk) 12:15, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Super Jump for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Super Jump is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Jump until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Palmer Clive Alive (talk) 12:18, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Formosa Youth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Formosa Youth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Formosa Youth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 15:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Steel Ball issue.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Steel Ball issue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:V Jump issue.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:V Jump issue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]