User talk:Keivan.f

It is 2:01 PM where this user lives. ⁽⁾

July 2024 Tatler issue

@Keivan.f Do you think the recent stir surrounding Catherine's portrait in Tatler's July 2024 issue deserves a mention on Wikipedia? Editors from reputable sources such as The Daily Telegraph, The Guardian, BBC News, and The Times have already criticised it in their articles. Looking forward to your opinion. Regards MSincccc (talk) 16:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

No it does not. It is the archetypal example of WP:NOTNEWS. Catherine did not even sit for that portrait. Keivan.f^Talk 16:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

@Keivan.f Could it be added to the article Fashion of Catherine, Princess of Wales given the magazine and the portrait itself focuses on that aspect of hers? Looking forward to your response. Regards MSincccc (talk) 16:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

I fail to see how it relates to her fashion. It depicts her in a gown she wore to a state banquet in November 2022, but that's pretty much it. This was an "unofficial" portrait published by a magazine who had previously put "unofficial" portraits of Queen Elizabeth and King Charles on its cover as well (source: 1). The fact of the matter is, Catherine is absent from the public sphere and the journalists who make money off her have to latch onto the tiniest little things about her at the moment to keep themselves afloat. As I've said, this has no long-term significance. Keivan.f^Talk 16:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

@Keivan.f Well, when are we proceeding with Catherine's FAC? Regards MSincccc (talk) 16:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Whenever other uninvolved editors start to leave comments on the nomination page. Frankly, it's out of my control. These things do not always proceed quickly and some patience is required. Keivan.f^Talk 17:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

@Keivan.f User 750h+ left comments on the FAC yesterday, which I have addressed. However, he will only extend his full support for the nomination once other experienced editors have done so. I have pinged a few of them, as you can see on the FAC discussion page and on some of their talk pages. Given that you are a co-nominator, I hope you will also actively collaborate on the FAC. Looking forward to your response. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 05:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I have my eyes on it and I'm aware of the progress. You have addressed the editor's comments which is good. I'll be waiting for the next batch of comments and we'll go from there. Keivan.f^Talk 16:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

@Keivan.f Gerda Arendt will be leaving comments once our turn arrives, as she is already very busy here on Wikipedia. Additionally, user Sohom Datta has assured me that they will do so within the next two days. Mike Christie is currently busy and unable to help until June, when he will assist if the nomination is still open for discussion. I look forward to hearing your thoughts on this. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 17:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

That's good. That should be enough feedback for an FAC. We'll be waiting for their comments then. Keivan.f^Talk 20:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

@Keivan.f It would be difficult for Mike Christie to review the article at any point this month as he is busy off-Wiki. Could you please request user Sohom for his final opinion? Looking forward to your response. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 04:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

I understand your desire to get this wrapped up quickly but we cannot overwhelm users with endless notifications and messages. He has already said that he would post his comments gradually starting this weekend. The last time he posted comments was like 20 hours ago. I'd wait a day or two and if there was no activity then I would contact them to finish their review. Keivan.f^Talk 07:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

@Keivan.f Are there any FAC mentors who might be interested in an article from the Royalty, nobility, and heraldry category? Also, I'm not in a rush to complete the process quickly, but I want to ensure it doesn't get archived due to inactivity or lack of general support. This way, I can submit a source review request, noting that any article submitted should have received several reviews and declarations of support. Looking forward to your response. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 07:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

The mentors are there to normally provide advice. I have never seen one actually get involved in commenting, though it is not impossible. I don't know any one in particular who might be interested in royalty, but someone who's interested in biographies in general can also help. I think the nomination itself is active enough at this point that it would not be archived, however, as I said I'll keep an eye on it to ensure we won't have long periods of inactivity. Keivan.f^Talk 07:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Seems like I would have to withdraw Catherine's nomination. Good to see the royals getting the same respect at FAC as they get from the rest of the country! :) ——Serial Number 54129 Regards MSincccc (talk) 15:17, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

What is this comment in relation to? Keivan.f^Talk 16:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

@Keivan.f I myself have failed to figure it out. You can search through the archives at the Good Article nominations talk page, where I and Serial have previously locked horns, though. Also the latest comment was made at user SchroCat's talk page. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 16:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Well, if they are anti-monarchist so be it. We are not under any obligations to share the same points of view. I advise you to stop interacting with them for the sake of your own mental health. Frankly I find sarcasm on Wikipedia to be the lowest form of humor. And their personal opinions have no bearing on the FAC's success. Keivan.f^Talk 17:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

@Keivan.f Would you help me with addressing user Ssilvers' comments at Catherine's FAC? I hope you have noticed them. Looking forward to your response. MSincccc (talk) 04:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Won't be able to do anything tonight but I'll try to catch up by tomorrow. Keivan.f^Talk 06:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

@Keivan.f User Wehwalt is about to leave comments, and Jo-Jo Emerson has taken up the article for source review. Given that we are anticipating comments for Ssilvers and Sohom Datta in the near future, it's time to get going. I look forward to your response. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 16:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the update. Will take a look at the FAC page and the process that's been made later today. Frankly I'm stuck with college assignments so I don't have free time regularly. Keivan.f^Talk 16:47, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

@Keivan.f I think the best thing now would be a complete rewrite of the article. What do you say? Looking forward to your response. MSincccc (talk) 19:01, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Aishwarya Rai Bachchan

On 31 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Aishwarya Rai Bachchan (pictured) was the first Indian actress to be a juror at the Cannes Film Festival? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Aishwarya Rai Bachchan. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Aishwarya Rai Bachchan), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 31 May 2024 (UTC)