User talk:Kendroche

DWThis user is a member of WikiProject Discworld.

.

Welcome

Hello, Kendroche, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 14:07, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Overview of the Bible

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Overview of the Bible. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - The Holy Bible. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The Holy Bible - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Stickee (talk) 10:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Book of Genesis summary

My summary was tongue in cheek - of course that's too brief. I may have another go in a more serious frame of mind. PiCo (talk) 08:17, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Batman: Under the Red Hood, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you.-5- (talk) 06:23, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:15, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Minor Discworld concepts

Hey. The article was deleted in November 2009 following a discussion, which you can view at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minor Discworld concepts (2nd nomination). — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 20:12, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you.

Can I take it that rediversion of broken links and addition of (External links) to lspace.org will be accepted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kendroche (talk • contribs) 21:49, August 7, 2010

Uh, what? — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 22:35, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

I redivert the broken links that point to Minor Discworld Concepts to L-Space wiki and add L-Space to the External Links on each page. The other option is get rid of the link which would be detrimental to the whole idea of a central knowledge source.Where is WikiResearch? (talk) 22:53, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Don't go around changing links like Minor Discworld concepts to Minor Discworld concepts or something like that. That'll come off as linkspammy. Just unlink it and add L-Space to the external links. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 02:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Will do.Where is WikiResearch? (talk) 07:04, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Um, just so you know, this sort of edit was not what I had in mind. That was unambiguous advertising. External links go in the external links section, usually down at the bottom of an article. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:54, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Oh, and copyright symbols (®, etc.) aren't used here either. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:55, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

WP Cryptozoology in the Signpost

"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Cryptozoology for a Signpost article to be published this month. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Also, if you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 16:36, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Cryptobarnstar

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Wikipedia_Awards#Cryptobarnstar. FYI. Kayau Voting IS evil C U NEXT YEAR 09:14, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:CryptoBarnstar.png

Thanks for uploading File:CryptoBarnstar.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:CryptoBarnstar2219.png

Thanks for uploading File:CryptoBarnstar2219.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:CryptoBarnstar2218.png

Thanks for uploading File:CryptoBarnstar2218.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

ClueBot Robbie Mannheim

array (

 'edit' => 
 array (
   'result' => 'Success',
   'pageid' => 14913742,
   'title' => 'User:ClueBot/FalsePositives/Reports',
   'oldrevid' => 380142044,
   'newrevid' => 380191661,
   'newtimestamp' => '2010-08-21T18:51:47Z',
 ),

)

Done.

Feedback regarding your recent edit to Extraterrestrial hypothesis

Hello. As you requested, I am leaving feedback for your changes to the article specified. Your edit added some useful information to the article, but as you said, some editing is needed. I have adjusted your edit to improve factual accuracy and grammar. The subject is not disputed by scientists. It is rejected virtually always. Only an immeasurably small portion of scientists buy into this theory. Less than 1% if I'm not mistaken. Based on studies, there has been no better evidence other than blurry/doctored photographs, hoaxes, and eyewitness testimony from people who saw something they don't understand, and then jumped to a conclusion too quickly. Negative evidence includes the fact that an unusually high amount of the UFO sightings occur in the USA, as well as conspiracy theories against the United States Government, indicating it to be a cultural phenomenon rather than a genuine theory. See the UFO conspiracy theory article for more information on that. Otherwise, I am open to feedback regarding my own edit. Thanks. -- IRP ☎ 21:09, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank You. This is exactly the sort of input that I was looking for. I am still working on the framework for the Religionist and Conspiracist sections, but if you have more to add to this section then please do. (a couple of points that I'm stuck on are: the section title:- posit:position / placing... geography was used as a stopgap; to fit in with the other titles and an alternative for 'religionist' - could offend some people).

The section is more a critisism of the scientific, religionistic and conspiracist theories rather than an advocation of ETH.

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Vote comment

As you commented in the pending closure discussion I am notifying you that the Wikipedia:Pending changes/Vote comment is now open and will be for two weeks, discussion as required can continue on the talkpage. Thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 23:35, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

		The Nessie Barnstar
		Excellent work on the Signpost interview! Gniniv (talk) 09:13, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Muwa

Hello Kendroche. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Muwa, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I'll just redirect it, it seems a reasonable search term. Thank you. GedUK  14:01, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Cryptozoology

Hi! We need to work on the quality and POV in this article. I think it would be good if we can get it to Good Article status. Would you be willing to help with the effort?--Gniniv (talk) 07:48, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi

Dear user: Please write to me in understandable English (or Spanish, or Italian, or Portuguese), I do not know what you meant. Regards. --Againme (talk) 10:37, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Ok (?) Thanks for your references. --Againme (talk) 12:03, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, my friend, I don't have time for this... I don't know if I want you to make it more clear... Is there a point in all these games? --Againme (talk) 12:20, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Yes. I'm trying to point out a major flaw in Wikipedia's linking system.Angry Mustelid (talk) 12:23, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Oh! That was what it was! I don't see the flaw... is a problem of learning the system: you just don't have to link It-alian, you have to link Italian... no mistake is possible... Againme (talk) 01:54, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:13, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Mentoring

Gosh... Im not looking for folks to help teach. Just people to help out like any other newbie... mostly with navigating WP. These are very advanced Business English students, so I dont expect too many problems with grammar or such... more with how to present information... 5 Pillars kind of stuff. As their English teacher, Im ultimately responsible. Their first assignment, as we will discuss tomorrow in class, is to poke around WP and find ways to make contact with other Wikipedians. Im following sociocultural theory here... in order to learn (a language) you have to immerse yourself in the appropriate situation. Most of my students are management and marketing majors but I have at least one engineer and a couple of finance and accounting majors.Thelmadatter (talk) 00:25, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

I have a partial list of students on my userpage if you're still interested in contacting one or two.Thelmadatter (talk) 12:11, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

some help??

Hi I was wondering if you can help me giving me some tips about wikiprojects. I´m new in wikipedia and I would like to work in diferent kind of themes like business and economics(would be helpful because I´m studing that)and why not? in some music themes too, well I think thats all by the moment.thank you for your time and I will wait for your response, good bye. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Francisco hinojosa (talk • contribs) 02:08, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi again

hello again I have been working in some articles and i think that I am doing it fine, but I was wondering if you can check when you have a free time this article where I am working You can tell me if it is fine or if I have to start all over again. The name of the article is "Celebration of Mexican political anniversaries in 2010". The part where I am working is the "cultural projects". So please give me your opinion and tell me what you think,good bye. Francisco hinojosa (talk) 18:36, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

I've left some comments on the atricle's discussion page.Angry Mustelid (talk) 20:20, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Tom Hicks

Can you please provide a ref for your sale of Liverpool edit you made here? Thank you,Red3biggs (talk) 16:20, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Your edit to list of best-selling video games.

VGChartz is not considered a reliable source for sales data and can't be used as a reference for the list. You'll need to find another source for that inclusion. Torinir ( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options ) 16:58, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:28, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

List of best selling video games reliable sources

Hi. I'm not quite sure what you mean by "I cannot find a template for the good faith revert". If you mean the edit notice it can be found here: Template:Editnotices/Page/List of best-selling video games. Bear in mind that only admins and accountcreators can edit edit notices, so you'll have to post an edit request on Template Talk:Editnotices/Page/List of best-selling video games. As this is the case, if you want to start a list of acceptable and unacceptable to add to I'd suggest you first discuss it at Talk: List of best-selling video games, not only so that the list represents consensus, but also because adding new entries to a list of accepted sources is not something admins should be doing every other day. Alphathon™ (talk) 18:06, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I see. Well it isn't a template or anything, it's an add-on called twinkle. For more info see Wikipedia:TW. It can also be used to revert vandalism with a similar link. Alphathon™ (talk) 18:23, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Cryptozoology Coordinator

I have appointed you to replace me as the Coordinator of the Cryptozoology WikiProject due to me leaving the Project. I hope that you will enjoy assisting this WikiProject's continued growth and development as much as I did. Your Co-coordinator is User:Twinsday and if you could notify him of the change and see if he is still interested in participating as your peer that would be great. Congratulations!-Novus Orator 00:47, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

What is a "mythtake"?

Hello! I noticed you added "mythtake an error in Wiki's correctionability algorithm." (I think your original phrasing was slightly different) to the mistake disambiguation page. Can you give a little more explanation of what a "mythtake" is? The link on the mistake disambig page goes to mythology, which didn't make much sense to me based on the explanation.

I searched around a bit on google and found the word used as a portmanteau of "myth" and "mistake"; other than this I didn't find much. Thanks! Scientific29 (talk) 01:18, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

So an instance of this ([[Port]]ugese in place of [[Portugese]]) would be called a mythtake? I'm not sure I understand. Scientific29 (talk) 03:18, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

So "mythtake" is a word that you yourself invented? That's is fine, but does the term then meet WP:Verifiability? If so we can make an article about the word; otherwise I don't think it would be appropriate to include the word. Scientific29 (talk) 22:13, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Ok. That is all fine, but such an item doesn't belong on a disambiguation page, which is in the article namespace. I am going to remove it if that is alright. Scientific29 (talk) 23:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Sorry if I wasn't clear! By disambiguation page I meant the mistake disambiguation page, where the word "mythtake" is mentioned.Scientific29 (talk) 23:19, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Ok! Will do! Great talking to you. Scientific29 (talk) 23:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Cryptozoology

Hello. I recently joined WikiProject Cryptozoology, and given that you are it's current coordinator, I suppose I just want to know what exactly your goals are with the project. What articles do you feel need the most help, where can I get started?

Thanks. - NickGrayLOL (talk) 06:51, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

OH!

WHAT A SURPRISE! THANK YOU VERY VERY MUCH!!!! That one is my most edited article! Againme (talk) 18:20, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of List of films considered the best for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of films considered the best is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films considered the best until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.. Thank you, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:16, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

I love Barnstars... :=) --Againme (talk) 18:37, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Suspicious addition to the List of cryptids

Devil Monkey links to the Yeti... Should we delete it? --Againme (talk) 06:57, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

===Devil Monkey Redirected to Cryptid Thank you for the heads up.Angry Mustelid (talk) 07:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Updating of the Wikipedia:Wikiproject Cryptids

Is this project page even active? If it is, I am proposing that it have a notability guideline and a manual of style on its articles.Kevinjonpalma11 (talk) 14:12, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

====Do what you wish====. As long as you don't break it. I have other concerns at the moment so I pass the torch to you. Please take care of it. Thank You

. Angry Mustelid (talk) 07:22, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to King Ghidorah may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * ''Keizer Ghidorah ([[Godzilla: Final Wars]]'': Able to fire Gravity beams from its mouths; can drain energy through

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:26, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Kendroche. You have new messages at Ged UK's talk page.
Message added 12:24, 29 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GedUK  12:24, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tenth Doctor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matt Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of William Hutton (geologist)

The article William Hutton (geologist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability is not established. Unreferenced, and the external link is dead.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Schwede66 00:38, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kendroche. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kendroche. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Cryptozoology Emergency

I've been seeing a lot of that looks like vandalism by :Bloodoffox, removing cryptozoology categories and rewording things to appear as though article topics are on mythological creatures. I believe this is an attempt to get his merger proposal for List of Cryptids merged with List of mythological creatures although I cannot be sure. You might want to give your input here

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kendroche. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:CryptoBarnstar.png

The file File:CryptoBarnstar.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC) Yep. Delete please.Angry Mustelid (talk) 09:27, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Benllech, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bangor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lord Vetinari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Warner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)