User talk:Kivo

Askern miners are semi professional — Preceding unsigned comment added by VictorylandNationalAccount (talk • contribs) 17:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rossington Main F.C. logo.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:ThorneCollieryFC.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Luxembourg National Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stade Municipal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Askernfclogo.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:PChurchFClogo.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Slazengers

I'm not sure it's useful creating an article if you have no information on the club beyond a single season in the Yorkshire League. Based on a post on NonLeagueZone, it seems they may be the same team as the current Horbury Town.

Also, as I've asked numerous times before, could you please format references properly using {{fchd}} and not leaving bare urls. Number 5 7 22:33, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:DodworthMWFC.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brodsworth Welfare AFC Club Badge.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brodsworth Welfare AFC Club Badge.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:CountySeniorFL.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:04, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CountySeniorLlogo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CountySeniorLlogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Humber Premier League

Any reason why you deleted all my edit on the Humber premier league page? MWRef92 (talk) 05:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste moves

Come on, you should know by now that you can't move a page by copying the text from one place and pasting it to another. To move an article you have to either use the move tab at the top of the article, or if this doesn't work, use the WP:RM process.

This is to ensure that an article history is retained. Number 5 7 14:49, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, could you avoid uploading a new version of club logos at a different title (as you've done for the Emley one) – its neater to keep the image history in one place, and creating a new one means the old one becomes an orphaned non-free file.

As a separate request, the league allocations will be announced tomorrow – if you're going to write some articles on some of the new clubs at step 6, please ensure they are proper articles with a decent amount of prose rather than efforts like this. Creating new articles with two or three sentences of text is potentially going to cause more harm than good, as very short and poorly referenced articles are far more likely to be put up for deletion, which does no favours for maintaining the current consensus around step 6 clubs being article-worthy. Cheers, Number 5 7 00:12, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you missed this message, but your Golcar United creation was exactly what I was asking you to stop doing. If you create articles like this, they're at high risk of being deleted, which will potentially have knock-on effects for other articles on clubs at this level if it means the consensus on step 6 clubs is broken. Please do not create any more club articles unless you're going to do it properly. Thanks, Number 5 7 21:16, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Founding date Stoke City F.C.

Hi Kivo,

I came across the rolling dispute about which team is the oldest football club. I am not a football fan, nor a supporter of any club. I went back to the sources, and found a large number of reliable sources that give 1863 as the founding date of Stoke Rambles - I've added three cites to the article. More can me provided. I also read the Birmingham Post article of 11th. December 1868. It does indeed say: "The Ramblers is a new club, only started this season". However I believe this is a reference to their first season in the league, not their first season as a football club. The majority of sources seem to agree that the Ramblers club was founded in 1863, and I think the article should reflect this. Railfan23 (talk) 18:06, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry but this is incorrect. "The Ramblers is a new club, only started this season" is a reference to the fact that the club was founded that season, not that they had entered a league (no leagues were created until 1888!). There is absolutely zero evidence of Stoke City being formed earlier than 1868. Kivo (talk) 18:08, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, please see the three sources I provided in the article. It is untrue that there is "absolutely zero evidence of Stoke City being formed earlier than 1868". What we have is a disagreement between the sources. The Birmingham Daily Post report is ambiguous, but useful. The other sources are to be weighed as well. There is a great deal of weight to the 1863 date. This is worth discussing further, but it is inappropriate to dismiss all evidence that doesn't fit your preferred date. Railfan23 (talk) 18:11, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The sources you have added simply state 1863 as the foundation date, while giving no evidence to back up the claim. These facts need to be verified to be believable sources. They can't just be believed because they're in a list somewhere. Again, there is no evidence whatsoever that Stoke City were formed before 1868. There is also no ambiguity regarding the Daily Post article. It quite clearly states that the club is a new one, only started that season.Kivo (talk) 18:14, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are mischaracterising the sources, and mistaking the way that verifiability works in Wikipedia. The three books I cited are edited and published by reliable publishers. The Burden and Morse book, in particular has more to say on the subject than the simple list entry you claim. They all, independently, give the founding date of the club as 1863. You can't simply dismiss them because you disagree with what they say. It may be that these books are wrong and the Birmingham Daily Post article is correct, but at the moment, the majority of the evidence available to us favours the 1863 date. Thanks, Railfan23 (talk) 18:20, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All I can find in the Burden & Morse book is the sentence "Formed as Stoke Ramblers as early as 1863". Where is the evidence for this claim? Not a single 'source' that claims 1863 shows any evidence to back up the claim. No contemporary newspaper reports, club minutes, nothing. The earliest mention of Stoke Ramblers in any contemporary source is from 1868, when it is referred to as a new club. Kivo (talk) 18:28, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How about the current compromise, where the evidence on both sides is presented to the reader? Railfan23 (talk) 19:09, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes this is fine, apart from the sentence that states the club to be the second oldest league club - obviously this is disputed too. Rather than labelling them the second or third oldest league club, it would be better to delete the sentence altogether and just state they were founder members of the Football League in 1888.Kivo (talk) 19:50, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That seems reasonable. Railfan23 (talk) 19:52, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2019–20 Northern Counties East Football League

Hello, Kivo,

Thanks for creating 2019–20 Northern Counties East Football League! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 11:30, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EastYorkshireCarnegieFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EastYorkshireCarnegieFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NWC

@Kivo:Thanks for your work on the NWC article for the forthcoming season. A while ago, 1874 Northwich announced that they were planning to move from Winsford's gorund and would be sharing at Barnton's ground for the next two seasons. I've seen nothing since, but am assuming that the new arrangements will be taking place. Drawoh46 (talk) 05:59, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Handsworth Parramore F.C. players

A tag has been placed on Category:Handsworth Parramore F.C. players requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:01, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category and image renames

Hello Kivo. When a club is renamed, please do not create new categories for the players/managers and empty the existing ones. You need to get the existing categories moved/renamed by requesting it at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion#Speedy renaming and merging. Also, when they release a new badge, please upload it at the same location as the existing one rather than uploading in a new version, otherwise this creates issues with orphaned non-free files (they don't seem to have released their new badge yet and the old one is still used on the club website). Number 5 7 13:53, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FrechevilleCAFC.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FrechevilleCAFC.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sheffield & Hallamshire County Senior Football League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kinsley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sheffield & Hallamshire County Senior Football League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cudworth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:14, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Women's Football at the Pacific Games

Template:Women's Football at the Pacific Games has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. HawkAussie (talk) 01:03, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of St. Brelade F.C. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. Brelade F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Brelade F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hugsyrup (talk) 11:36, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sheffield & Hallamshire County Senior Football League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hillsborough (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:22, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BarnsleyLFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BarnsleyLFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VirginiaWaterFC.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VirginiaWaterFC.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maps on old league seasons pages

I've decided to delete maps, cause this data was unsourced. And mostly maps point the locations of CURRENT stadiums. Clubs may be relocated since that time. Martinklavier (talk) 07:21, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I made sure that grounds were those used at the time.

Orphaned non-free image File:NewarkFlowserve.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NewarkFlowserve.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CountySeniorFL.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CountySeniorFL.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Beeches Old Boys F.C.

The article Beeches Old Boys F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NORG. Makes no claim to notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wadham Lodge F.C.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wadham Lodge F.C.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NorthernersAC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NorthernersAC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ThackleyAFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ThackleyAFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FrechevilleDavysFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FrechevilleDavysFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Doncaster League

Hi there. I notice that you have created a new article at Doncaster Saturday Football League and then re-directed the article under the new name to it. This is totally the wrong procedure. If the league simply changed its name, you should have moved the article to the new title, not created a new article. I'm going to revert all these edits, move the article per the correct procedure, then do a page merge history. You may wish to check the article afterwards to make sure I haven't missed anything -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:32, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the first time this has happened... Number 5 7 20:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DoncSeniorLeague.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DoncSeniorLeague.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:YorkshireMainFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:YorkshireMainFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sheffield & Hallamshire Women's Football League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eckington.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:15, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HandsworthLFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HandsworthLFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1997–98 Kent Football League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1997–98 Kent Football League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1997–98 Kent Football League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 22:59, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sheffield & Hallamshire County Senior Football League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cudworth.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Ingham

Can you please explain why you removed references from this article? Giant Snowman 11:32, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:IlkestonTown.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IlkestonTown.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conor Grant

When moving articles to disambiguate them from a base name, please ensure you change the old base name page into a disambiguation page and fix all broken links. I have done this at Conor Grant now. Giant Snowman 20:06, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EastHullFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EastHullFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hope Valley Amateur League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hope Valley Amateur League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hope Valley Amateur League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UEFA-U17-2018.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UEFA-U17-2018.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:22, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:IlkestonTown.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IlkestonTown.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sheffield & Hallamshire County Senior Football League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hepworth.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contradictory information

Hello Kivo. I notice that at Barnsley Association League, you listed Worsbrough Bridge as having won the league in 1950–51 and 1952–53. However, on the Bridge article, you listed them as winning it in 1956–57 (when Houghton Main Welfare won it according to the league article) and 1959–60 (Cortonwood Miners Welfare). Which is correct? Cheers, Number 5 7 22:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- Hi. Up to the late 1960s, the Barnsley Association League determined its winner with an end of season play-off between the top four teams - meaning sides could finish top of the league table and still not win the championship. Worsborough topped the table several times but only won the play-off final in 1951 and 1953.Kivo (talk) 15:09, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SouthKirkbyFC.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SouthKirkbyFC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SandbachUnited.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SandbachUnited.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arthur Grainger

The article Arthur Grainger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

With the death of WP:NFOOTY, football players must meet WP:GNG. I have not been able to find any substantive coverage of Grainger (nor even any indication that there might be, such as trivial mentions in books).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:18, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Keighley Central F.C.

The article Keighley Central F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable club now that the rules are changing: Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Sports notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:23, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Keighley Central F.C. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keighley Central F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keighley Central F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:57, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:IlkestonTown.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IlkestonTown.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NorthernPremierLeaguelogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NorthernPremierLeaguelogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1st Surry Rifle F.C.

Proposed deletion of 1st Surrey Rifles F.C.

The article 1st Surrey Rifles F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

this article adds little information to the project, and there is no researchable information available elsewhere on the internet.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sheehanpg93 (talk) 14:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brimsdown F.C. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brimsdown F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brimsdown F.C. (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BrigadierG (talk) 19:08, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WakefieldAFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WakefieldAFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BrodsworthMainFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BrodsworthMainFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Newark F.C. (1880s)

A tag has been placed on Newark F.C. (1880s) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

stub page with an inaccurate title and a proper page elsewhere

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. In Vitrio (talk) 10:16, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Am proposing the deletion of Newark F.C> (1880s) - I've found some more details and the club was actually founded in 1868, and dissolved before World War 1. So have put the full details on the original Newark F.C. page.

Agreed with everything you say, best to delete the page now the former Flowserve have changed name again. Kivo (talk) 08:38, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OllertonTownFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OllertonTownFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BrimsdownFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BrimsdownFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:05, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sheffield & Hallamshire Women & Girls League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cudworth.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WestBridgfordFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WestBridgfordFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doncaster City AfD

You will have seen my contributions to the Doncaster City AfD and as you know, I have voted for its retention, but also noting the established notability criteria, which is your sole reason for you starting this AfD, so that we avoid the principle that every Step 7 team is suddenly now seen as notable.

As you will have seen, I made the comment about the CMA being a special case due to its multi-county reach, and my suggestion that the North and South Division teams have their own articles, but that only the CMA is included in this, and only due to its geographical reach to ensure what I know you are concerned about, that a president would be set regarding Step 7, and I feel that this concern is very legitimate.

What are your thoughts about the CMA being seen as a special case - ie that this Step 7 league, and only this Step 7 league, is seen as notable enough for its teams to have their own articles on Wikipedia.Rillington (talk) 10:33, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is a good idea – the CMA's reach is not unusually large, nor is it the only cross-border league at this level. Clubs at step 7 can be notable if they have previously played at a higher level or in the FA Cup/Vase, but a blanket allowance for CMA clubs would not work IMO. Number 5 7 17:25, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You will have seen that the Doncaster City article has been kept and, as I indicated before, I feel that all CMA top division clubs should also have their own article on the grounds of the geographical spread of the CMA over several different counties. However, I'm concerned that my efforts might be in vain due to them subsequently being defeated on the notability grounds established many years ago. Which, if any, other CMA clubs which have not previously played at Step 6 or higher, do you think should also now have their own article? Rillington (talk) 06:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Angels F.C.

The article Angels F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources, fails WP:ORGCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 18:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dearne & District F.C. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dearne & District F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dearne & District F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dafydd y Corach (talk) 07:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Crap articles (again)

I have asked you a couple of times in the past, but I will ask again: If you are going to start articles on new step six clubs, please do a proper job and make sure they are well-referenced with reliable, independent, non-database sources. Sourcing to the FCHD or a league website does not count for WP:GNG. The D&D article would almost certainly have been deleted if you had left it in the state it was as there was no evidence of it meeting GNG at the time (I've since added several sources) and you provided none in the AfD. Number 5 7 00:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NostellWelfareFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NostellWelfareFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NewburyForestFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NewburyForestFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ThorneCollieryFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ThorneCollieryFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]