User talk:LBrown338

Spam in Scalable Network Technologies

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Scalable Network Technologies, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Scalable Network Technologies is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Scalable Network Technologies, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 01:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: SNT

Hey, there were two problems with your article. The first is it was written more like an an advertisement or press release than an encyclopedic article, which must be written from a neutral point of view. WP:NPOV and WP:ADVERT provide more info on what is a neutral article and what isn't. The second, more serious problem is that there is very little information available about this company that is not a press release or a short 'basic info' page about them. This means that unless you can provide more information from reliable sources about it, than the company fails Wikipedia's notability rules found here. Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 01:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Rajive Bagrodia

I looked it over and to be honest, I can't find anything that would suggest that he is not notable and the article is very well written given the relatively small amount of info available on this person. All the citations to reputable sources tend to help keep NewPage patrollers from jumping the gun on tagging it as they clearly establish that he is notable. Also, just a comment, you might consider using the {{cite web}} template to format the references for easier reading, but you don't have to if you don't want to (more info about the template is on the link) Great job on the article and keep up the good work! :) Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 01:18, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Thingg for taking the time to look it over. Will implement the more structured reference format.

LBrown338 (talk) 17:41, 19 February 2010 (UTC)LBrown338[reply]