User talk:LooneyTunerIan

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GaneshBhakt (talk) 06:05, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Looney Tunes Show. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 19:30, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. ^^; I only wanted to change the color from purple to red.

Your edits on List of The Looney Tunes Show episodes

I have reverted your edit as you fail to provide reliable sources to verify that season one has completed. Please provide a reliable source to verify any claims you make in any article. Thank you. Sarujo (talk) 22:54, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, other wikis and wikia are not reliable sources. Even if you take the guideline out of consideration, it still doesn't verify the information you're trying to add here. Still, we are not taking anything that comes from a wiki of wikia into any kind of consideration. Sarujo (talk) 14:09, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding that date without reliable sources. Otherwise you will be reported to administration for disruptive editing. Sarujo (talk) 08:25, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, LooneyTunerIan. You have new messages at Talk:List of The Looney Tunes Show episodes.
Message added Sarujo (talk) 19:55, 6 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I put this talkback up here for a reason. If you've got something to say in regards to that article, then you take to that article's talk page and not my talkpage. Sarujo (talk) 20:20, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Ducking the Devil do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Generally, links to shop sites are considered spam links. Toddst1 (talk) 22:33, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. It's clear you're a Looney Tunes enthusiast contributing in good faith. Common newbie mistake. Good luck. Toddst1 (talk) 22:41, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Editors, Beware of Sarujo

He doesn't believe about who actually sings/performs what in the Merrie Melodies music videos. He's just bein' an upstart.

Looney Tunes Super-Stars

Why do you insist on continually adding the bit about how collectors should avoid certain Looney Tunes Super-Stars releases? Sb2007 (talk) 16:16, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because I saw lots of bad reviews written for certain Double-Dipping LTSS DVDs on Amazon.Com and even on the Warner Bros. Online Shop Store.

I saw lots of reveiwers giving low stars and written negative reveiws for most LTSS DVDs, mainly the double dipping LTSS.

But also lots of Collectors were disappointed on the Road Runner Super Stars DVD because it didn't contain any of the classic Chuck Jones Road Runner Cartoons.

Lots of reviewers have writing negative reviews for the Super Genius Hijinx DVD as well.

I only add the bits of avoiding any certain LTSS DVDs if they are double dips or if something is wrong with the DVD.

>> But here's the thing. Wikipedia isn't a DVD review site. It's an online encyclopedia designed to present facts. While it is true that some of the Looney Tunes sets have received negative reviews for various reasons (whether double dips or being Blu-ray only or widescreen cropping), it doesn't belong on Wikipedia for two reasons: 1) It gives the articles a bias. This is particularly true in the Road Runner Super-Stars article, as the merits of those Larriva Road Runners is strictly opinion. By saying collectors should avoid that release, it makes the article look like it was written by someone who has an axe to grind with those specific cartoons. Additionally, there -are- some collectors who do want to own every short, so this sort of inclusion is pointless and inaccurate.

2) Saying that people should avoid a release if it doesn't contain cartoons they like kind of goes without saying, and feels redundant. Why is it necessary to say people should avoid a release if it's already stated in the earlier sentences that it's all double dips from previous Looney Tunes DVD releases? What does that add? Don't you think people are smart enough to infer that if a release is double dips, they won't want it if they already have those cartoons? Sb2007 (talk) 22:21, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Looney Tunes: Space Race, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Granny (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warner Bros. Golden Jubilee: 24 Karat Collection

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Warner Bros. Golden Jubilee: 24 Karat Collection, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://looney.goldenagecartoons.com/DVDvideo/VHS/videogoljub.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:24, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

I have reverted your edit on My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic (season 4), because that's not a valid source of the article even that you changed the color to green, but not green, purple. Thanks, --Allen ^{(talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me)} 02:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

YOU DON'T KNOW NOTHIN'! You're getting your colors confused, Season 1's already purple! You don't need to make Season 4 purple, too! I'm going to change the color again, and if this happens again, then as I said before: THERE'S GONNA BE TROUBLE! You got it?! --LooneyTunerIan (talk) 22:27, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your what you've said. There is no trouble in that article. And please refrain from making comments like that, and don't get frustrated with that season colors. --Allen ^{(talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me)} 23:28, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Majhost

A tag has been placed on Majhost, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is an "attack page", and appears to be primarily intended to disparage or threaten its subject. This includes biographies of living people that are unsourced and entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks; attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 17:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted this article. If an article is to exist it must present a neutral tone and be sourced. It was deleted because it lacked sourcing and was primarily negative. The text of the article is available via e-mail but cannot be on the wiki in its present form. Thank you for understanding. Chillum 17:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the[1] comment, just don't. It will result in a block. Chillum 18:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic (season 5). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:58, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mai 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to The Cutie Map, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.Same goes for My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic (season 5). Gial Ackbar (talk) 07:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Bugs Bunny: Winner By A Hare

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. LooneyTunerIan, thanks for creating Bugs Bunny: Winner By A Hare!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:20, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looney Tunes Presents (VHS Series)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Looney Tunes Presents (VHS Series), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://looney.goldenagecartoons.com/DVDvideo/VHS/videoltpresents.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:32, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Looney Tunes Presents (VHS Series)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Looney Tunes Presents (VHS Series) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://looney.goldenagecartoons.com/DVDvideo/VHS/videoltpresents.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ Rob^Talk 06:01, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks can easily be misinterpreted. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. ~ Rob^Talk 06:06, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bugs and Friends

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bugs and Friends requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://looney.goldenagecartoons.com/DVDvideo/LD/japanlaser.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ Rob^Talk 19:56, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ~ Rob^Talk 02:26, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Road Runner vs. Wile E. Coyote: If At First You Don't Succeed... for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Road Runner vs. Wile E. Coyote: If At First You Don't Succeed... is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Road Runner vs. Wile E. Coyote: If At First You Don't Succeed... until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Flat Out (talk) 03:28, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daffy Duck: Duck Victory for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daffy Duck: Duck Victory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daffy Duck: Duck Victory until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Flat Out (talk) 03:28, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bugs Bunny: Hare Beyond Compare for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bugs Bunny: Hare Beyond Compare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bugs Bunny: Hare Beyond Compare until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Flat Out (talk) 03:29, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating for speedy deletion

On Stars of Space Jam, you would need to put that code WITHOUT the no-wiki tags for the template to be placed on the page and the articles to be nominated for speedy deletion. Sorry for the confusion. The no-wiki tags were so that the template wasn't placed on the ANI page itself. ~ Rob^Talk 05:52, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. Your articles were deleted because either

you did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines.
The article was a copyright violation. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain.

Note that persistent recreation of articles deleted by due process can be seen as disruptive action and could lead to admin actions such as

Protecting the page so it cannot be recreated
Blocking the user concerned, which also prevents creation of a new account

I'm sorry if this reads like a threat but it's only fair to let you know that tendentious editing may have consequences. Thanks Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:57, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, I'm Wildthing61476. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to A Sheep in the Deep because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The short in fact does exist, please do not change sourced content. Wildthing61476 (talk) 14:11, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at A Sheep in the Deep. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ Rob^Talk 06:35, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at The Cutie Map. You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gial Ackbar (talk) 08:19, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ~ Rob^Talk 12:59, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Per your request that you receive a formal warning in order to control yourself, consider this to cover WP:POINT and all other concepts mentioned in WP:ANI. DMacks (talk) 19:26, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mouse-Taken Identity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mouse-Taken Identity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mouse-Taken Identity until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Flat Out (talk) 01:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Guy (Help!) 10:24, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that comments like this indicate unacceptable attempts to own content and this is emblematic of your entire approach, which is combative and excessively focused on trivia. Guy (Help!) 10:25, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LooneyTunerIan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you're gonna block me for 6 months, you'd better make it forever with a notice saying: You are hereby banned from Wikipedia forever! And that means no more editing! Now go find your own wiki to edit all you like and never come back! Ever! ~~~~

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:14, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access removed

I have removed your talk page access due to misuse of the unblock template. You may appeal the block through WP:UTRS. Chillum 18:09, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm UserDe. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Boomerang (TV channel) that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. UserDe (talk) 01:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced additions, personal attacks, etc.

Your edit summary at Boomerang (TV channel) included a personal attack. Personal attacks are not acceptable anywhere on Wikipedia.

"I heard it from _______" is not a verifiable source for anything.

If you are having difficulties, please discuss the issue on the article's talk page. - SummerPhD^v2.0 01:33, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Hi there, I'm an administrator on the English Wikipedia. Please avoid personal attacks. If you are easily frustrated, Wikipedia is going to constantly test your patience, as this is a collaborative project and people don't always see eye-to-eye. Civility is a must. With regard to your objection, per WP:BRD, if content you submit is reverted, the onus is on you to open a discussion to seek consensus for inclusion rather than to resubmit the content. Another editor has objected on the basis that the content seems trivial, so why don't you open a polite discussion to find out why the other editor thinks this way? Personally, I think it's a little unclear what long-term academic benefit is being served in an encyclopedia by including one guy's opinion about a mobile app. In 5 years, will we care that he thought people should complain? Anyhow, that's something you can discuss with Summer. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Boomerang (TV channel) are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 13:32, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As previously noted,[User_talk:LooneyTunerIan#Unsourced_additions.2C_personal_attacks.2C_etc.] what you believe you know is not a usable source.[2]

As has also been explained to you previously, when you make a change to an article and it is reverted, it is time to discuss the issue on the article's talk page, not step toward an edit war. Please see WP:BRD and discuss the issue on the article's talk page. - SummerPhD^v2.0 17:43, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Fairly OddParents, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 04:58, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at King's Game The Animation‎, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 11:13, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhh, go stuff it! I know for a fact that a new episode is shown every Thursday! And if you don't believe me, you'll have to give me a warning. :/ --LooneyTunerIan (talk) 17:42, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The way you describe it, it's like 'oh thursday'. But, from just adding the date to an episode to a show. Like if a tv station shows it at midnight, (from it being a wednesday and its thursday.)

Or look at crunchyroll, when the peculiar named show would be released at 9;00 pst, but when the date is added is ok. If it was 'on the dot.' Then if it was hours/ some time before, as when the tv station released the episode, then their regional online video service does too. Wait until there's a ref/ source that can be proved. (I.e. a tv schedule of when it's shown. At-x, Tokyo MX or this as it's a different show/anime) Other than that, you can wait until crunchyroll tells when it is, other online video services, etc. Unblue box (talk) 20:50, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, LooneyTunerIan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TV Funhouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dennis the Menace (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, I'm SkyWarrior. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Net neutrality seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I have also removed your comment at the talk page for violating WP:NOTFORUM. Thank you. SkyWarrior 03:31, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop using articles and talk pages as soapboxes please. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:39, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Would you rather lose your internet freedom rights? Net Neutrality is in dire peril!!!!!! --LooneyTunerIan (talk) 06:42, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. – BoogerD (talk) 01:31, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=Everyone thinks I'm not here to build an encyclopedia, but I am simply trying to edit some articles when some pushy fussy editor refuses to let me keep my edits in tact.--LooneyTunerIan (talk) 16:35, 4 June 2018 (UTC)}}

. RickinBaltimore (talk) 02:23, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

LooneyTunerIan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21709 was submitted on Jun 04, 2018 03:12:16. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:12, 4 June 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

LooneyTunerIan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21714 was submitted on Jun 04, 2018 16:39:16. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:39, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LooneyTunerIan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Everyone thinks I'm not here to build an encyclopedia, but I am simply trying to edit some articles when some pushy fussy editor refuses to let me keep my edits in tact.--LooneyTunerIan (talk) 16:35, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your block was the result of a community consensus. It was not just one pushy, fussy editor. Yamla (talk) 18:30, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

LooneyTunerIan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21717 was submitted on Jun 04, 2018 19:10:08. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:10, 4 June 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

LooneyTunerIan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21725 was submitted on Jun 05, 2018 03:22:51. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:22, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking

You are not permitted to blank declines for current blocks. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 14:31, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned. I have now revoked your talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 14:38, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

LooneyTunerIan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21733 was submitted on Jun 05, 2018 15:04:42. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:04, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]