User talk:Mastergerwe97

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia! We crossed paths on Talk:2019–20 NFL playoffs and I replied to your comment there. If you have any questions on anything, don't hesitate to ask. Useight (talk) 02:23, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Signings

Hi - I reverted your good-faith edit to Kevin Pillar, which you commented as "Bleacher Report announced he signed with the Red Sox". What Bleacher Report reported (here) is "The Boston Red Sox signed veteran outfielder Kevin Pillar to a one-year major league contract Wednesday, according to Bob Nightengale of USA Today." (bolding added by me) That's not official, that's sports reporters doing what sports reporters do. Updates to player pages about signings or trades should be made when they can be supported by official announcement from the team itself, an executive of the team (e.g. the general manager), or MLB. Thanks. Dmoore5556 (talk) 19:08, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Kevin Pillar. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that this is the very same issue as the warning above. He’s still not on Boston’s 40-man roster. Larry Hockett (Talk) 02:30, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

You don't really know what you're doing and you're getting in the way of more productive editing.

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to 2020 Stanley Cup playoffs has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Deadman137 (talk) 18:45, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Deadman137 (talk) 21:44, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bucs

Maybe wait another 2:30 Samir 03:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Stanley Cup playoffs

You've been warned in the past about making edits too early. If you do that again I will be forced to issue you a formal warning, do yourself a favor and stop doing things like that. Deadman137 (talk) 01:34, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How about no. I knew the Bruins were going to clinch. I added brackets. Just stop. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 01:37, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editing a game with 2 minutes left with a team up by 3, how many times does that team blow the game? Very rarely. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 01:38, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Waste of time, complete waste of time. Just stop. I’ll edit when I want to. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 01:40, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You take things way to seriously. I’ll edit when a team is up with 30 seconds left in the game. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 01:42, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to get yourself blocked in the future that's fine by me. Ultimately you'll decide if you want to be a useful editor or a problem one. Also editing any game result before the game is over is a violation of policy. Deadman137 (talk) 01:43, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yet do you see everyone else doing it? Because Wikipedia doesn’t care! It’s not reliable at all. You can’t even source it for essays because it’s inaccurate! Mastergerwe97 (talk) 01:50, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has policies in place that state that what you are doing is not permitted. You've been warned many different times (a minimum of five times based on your editing history) to stop being disruptive and yet you keep ignoring that. If you honestly feel that this site is useless then why are you even here? Deadman137 (talk) 03:30, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Deadman137 (talk) 01:48, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you not know how many people edit Wikipedia and no one reverts the edit? Wikipedia is not at all reliable. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 01:52, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shit, I remember that during the World Series, everyone would edit the score after an inning. Same thing applied with the Super Bowl. Yet people like you take things way to seriously. Like I said, Wikipedia ultimately doesn’t care about “premature edits” Mastergerwe97 (talk) 01:55, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Deadman137 (talk) 03:56, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey fuck off. The game is already over. I’m not hurting anyone, you’re being a real asshole. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 03:57, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Jets were up by 4 with 49 seconds left. It is physically impossible for a team to score 4 goals in 10 seconds. I know what I’m doing. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 03:59, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Therefore, they were going to eventually win the game. Therefore, I saved your ass from reverting. I know what I’m doing. This was going to end up on Wikipedia anyway, and I saved you from doing it. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 04:00, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You saved no one from anything, all you've done is prove that you're chosing to be a problem. Next time that you do that I'll have to report you and if you get blocked you'll have no one to blame but yourself. Deadman137 (talk) 04:05, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yet you don’t do anything about the disruptive editing for the World Series and Super Bowl, but you care about this? Who are you, the Wikipedia police? Mastergerwe97 (talk) 04:09, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not my responsibility to check every article. The interesting part is that you've known since January 2020 that these types of edits are not permitted, yet you've continued to persist for almost a year and half, despite numerous people telling you otherwise. You are also resorting to uncivil comments and inappropriate behaviour, these are issues that may need to be dealt with if your conduct does not change. Despite all of that, I'm going to offer you one final chance to walk away from making these types of edits again without the need for administrative intervention. If you want to hang yourself out to dry I can't stop you, but you have a chance to save yourself, it would be a good idea for you right now to do just that. Deadman137 (talk) 15:24, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m just saying it’s not disruptive editing when a team is up by 4 goals with one minute left. I literally told you that it is impossible to score 4 goals in 25 seconds. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 16:36, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to hear that you are unwilling to change your attitude. What you described is literally a definition of disruptive editing; which is interesting because in the section right below this you're worried about a player release being official yet you don't apply the same standard to other things. At this point I will ask you to stop editing anything to do with any upcoming or ongoing ice hockey tournaments as it is clear that you create more problems than you're fixing. Deadman137 (talk) 21:55, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop disruptive editing on Albert Pujols, if you continue you will be blocked from Wikipedia.

Disruptive editing? You’re the one who’s being disruptive. We use MLB transactions here. It isn’t a reliable source if someone reports it. Spotrac isn’t either. Try MLB transactions. That’s reliable. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 18:39, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? Yeah that’s not happening. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 23:50, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are just making too many errors to be effective in these articles. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Deadman137 (talk) 02:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Errors? I don’t use Wikipedia that much. I’m not a geek like you are. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 02:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m more of a gamer. Sure I follow sports as well, but like I said, I don’t use Wikipedia that much. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 02:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just stop; while you may mean well you just are not skilled enough to be a useful contributor in these types of articles. Being an inexperienced editor is not an excuse when the quality of your work is this bad. Deadman137 (talk) 03:02, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bro, I’m not much of a writer. I told you that. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 03:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You’re making a huge deal out of this. Just relax. Not everyone is skilled. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 03:13, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deadman137 am I doing a better job now? You feel happier? Mastergerwe97 (talk) 19:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Pujols

It is official though. 13Sundin (talk) 18:39, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it isn’t. Just because someone reports it, doesn’t make it official. It isn’t official on https://www.espn.com/mlb/transactions Until it has been posted, then it’s official. But it isn’t right now. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 18:40, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is. It is right on their website. 13Sundin (talk) 18:44, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That isn’t reliable though Mastergerwe97 (talk) 18:45, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fine Mastergerwe97 (talk) 18:45, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You claim their website is not reliable enough? OK then. https://www.mlb.com/angels/news/albert-pujols-released-by-angels 13Sundin (talk) 18:47, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Still, I’m used to ESPN. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 18:48, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just to chime in, ESPN transactions can be delayed. It's probably best to look at the official transaction page when reporting events like this. Troutfarm27 ^(Talk) 18:50, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

troutfarm27 yeah, that is the link I provided earlier. MLB website is the best source. 13Sundin (talk) 18:56, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mastergerwe97 I saw your later post after I left my comment. No hard feelings then, I hope? 13Sundin (talk) 18:57, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I guess? Mastergerwe97 (talk) 19:25, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 01:33, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Dennis Schröder, you may be blocked from editing. —Bagumba (talk) 01:47, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing? ESPN says he’s on the Celtics roster! Mastergerwe97 (talk) 05:24, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.espn.com/nba/team/roster/_/name/bos/boston-celtics

He’s on the roster is he not? Mastergerwe97 (talk) 05:25, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He's on the official roster when the Celtics add him to the roster on their official website. Any others are unofficial. Basically when the team or league announces the signing it is official. Until the it is just reported. The announcement can come through the NBA.com transaction log, the team website, the team official Twitter account or just adding to the team roster (but just the official one). Hope this helps. Rikster2 (talk) 20:04, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying Rikster2. I don’t use Wikipedia that much, I only use it to update the scores in the playoffs sometimes and to update new team signings. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 18:54, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 American League Division Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luis Patiño. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TRI–CRC goal

I wish to seek consensus for references regarding recording goals in footy matches (e.g. official reports vs. match highlights), especially Cristín Granados' second against TRI the other day, so I have started a conversation at Talk:2022 CONCACAF W Championship#Goal Timing. This would likely also have broader implications across all of association football, but I feel starting small is better, then we can move to WT:FOOTY for a broader consensus. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 20:10, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quota-Places Paris 2024

Hello dear collaborators! You guys are very up-to-date on the sport and have made excellent edits.
There is a proposal to show the countries already qualified for Paris 2024 in the article (With references from the IOC). If you like to support, you can write an Agree on the talk page: Talk:2024 Summer Olympics (below). If you are against it, you can also comment on it. ;)

Thanks all for your time, thak you very much! @Dannyphx, @Tomrtn, @Sqldf03, @HiddenFace101 Rey1996ss (talk) 23:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2023 World Baseball Classic knockout stage

added a link pointing to David Bednar

United States national baseball team

added a link pointing to David Bednar

Venezuela national baseball team

added a link pointing to David Bednar

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2023 Stanley Cup playoffs. Speculative edits are not permitted, given your issues with this subject matter in the past you might want to find something else to do. Deadman137 (talk) 21:20, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m serious. Look at the playoff tickets. They have announced the game and the times. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 21:30, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/boston/news/bruins-set-to-begin-postseason-with-game-1-on-marathon-monday/

apparently you’re not up to date with the news since you’re probably busy.

At least I’m being smart Mastergerwe97 (talk) 21:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.- L'Mainerque - (Disturb my slumber) - 21:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Is that what Wikipedia is about? People being so fucking sensitive over the smallest things? Mastergerwe97 (talk) 21:39, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not my problem he constantly pisses me off. And yes I can agree that I have anger issues and problems. I could literally give two shits about Wikipedia. This website isn’t knowledgeable at all, tons of people disrupt it daily. That’s why you never use it as a source when you’re writing a paper. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 21:43, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you ever want to be a productive editor on here, you must be civil, and that is pretty much non-negotiable. - L'Mainerque - (Disturb my slumber) - 21:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

100% not my fault. Just because you guys don’t conduct your research into start times like I do, doesn’t necessarily mean I’m to blame. Mastergerwe97 (talk) 21:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Redacted) Mastergerwe97 (talk) 21:51, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

3rr

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Canterbury Tail talk 21:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

48 hour block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors, as you did at 2023 Stanley Cup playoffs. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 21:56, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you use this time to cool off, and then visit the ANI discussion, where the possibility of an interaction ban between you and Deadman137 will be discussed. I see you and he have history that goes way back, and that you tend to make each other angry. Hopefully an interaction ban will prevent this from happening again. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 22:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you decided to start using your talkpage for homophobic attacks I've upped the block to indefinite and blocked your talkpage access. That kind of behaviour is not acceptable anywhere. Canterbury Tail talk 22:44, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]