User talk:Mejor Los Indios

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 193.1.172.163 lifted or expired. Request handled by: Netsnipe ► 11:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Mejor Los Indios! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Netsnipe ► 11:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Building consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on Laser. :) · AndonicO ^Talk 13:47, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback

Would you mind giving feed back on the Polymer Concrete article. Tell me if it needs more or some corrections. Thanks

January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Silicic has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 19:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Silicic constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 20:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Silicic. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. The Helpful One 20:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Almandine. The Helpful One 20:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Surface of the Earth

A tag has been placed on Surface of the Earth, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This information is included here and this article may only be needed on expansion of the previous article

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Booglamay (talk) 13:50, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Landforms of Connacht

Category:Landforms of Connacht, and several other similar categories which you created, have been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –

Image copyright problem with Image:Acaill Abú.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Mejor Los Indios!
We thank you for uploading Image:Acaill Abú.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 19:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at Wikipedia:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals. This is partly in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies, and partly so that those who regularly deal with stub articles know what stub types are likely to need re-sorting soon. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 01:23, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Landforms of Achill Island

Republic of Ireland

Is that really necessary to add Republic of to the {{renewable energy by country}} template? What other Ireland is there? Northern Ireland is not a country and would not be included in the template. Lots of countries are RO name, but that isn't the common name and isn't included. 199.125.109.136 (talk) 06:07, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's Ireland. Mejor Los Indios (talk) 08:47, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ireland isn't a country, it's an island. The template lists countries, not islands. As you can see the template has already been corrected per wp:MOS (specifically IMOS). 199.125.109.136 (talk) 23:41, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Linking

Hey, please have a look at WP:MOS#Wikilinks. You've been adding far too many wikilinks to pages, and they look a little cluttered, basically! (For example, this edit to Bray Head.) Thanks. --Schcambo^{aon scéal?} 17:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've already been called out on this, and yet your edit to North China Plain converted that article into a mass of useless wikilinks to articles on weather, area, square kilometer, flood, drought, cultural, political, etc. These are all junk edits with virtually no value to the article. There's no need to link every single word in the article to another article.

Bathrobe (talk) 02:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No one is doubting the usefulness of wikilinks. The problem is when you add virtually meaningless links like weather, cultural etc. as I've mentioned above. A person reading an article such as this will want to get a better idea of related material, such as Beijing, Tianjin, and Bohai Gulf (which you DE-linked for some mysterious reason), but there's no reason to provide links to each and every generic concept found in the article, such as "river", "mountain", "weather", "horse", or "communication". This is supported by the following paragraph concerning overlinking:

[1]

Overlinking includes:

A large proportion of the words in each sentence being rendered as links.
Links that have little information content, such as linking on specific years like 1995, or unnecessary linking of common words used in the common way, for which the reader can be expected to understand the word's full meaning in context, without any hyperlink help. (My italics)

Your linking to common words is quite clearly overlinking as defined here.

Bathrobe (talk) 07:08, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Hi, please watch out for excessive linking of terms in an article, like in Etosha National Park. Common words like 'area', 'world', 'dust', and so on, should only be linked very rarely. Wikilinking is great and very powerful, but too much of it is a bad thing. Thanks! — BillC ^talk 22:53, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Connacht and Ulster categories

Last year you created a bunch of geographical categories relating to Ireland, all of which were merged to parent categories at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_March_29#Connacht_categories.

I just spotted on my watchlist that you have been busy recreating them, despite the consensus to delete. I am in the process of deleting the categories and reverting your related changes ... and please don't try recreating them again.

There was a clear decision on this less than a year, and recreating deleted content can lead to an editor being sanctioned for as disruptive and/or Tendentious editing. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! I see you have recently created one or more new stub templates or categories. As it states at Wikipedia:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types be proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals. This helps to reach consensus about whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries, where comments are welcome as to any rationale for this stub type. Please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals! Please note we already have templates for each county of Ireland. Waacstats (talk) 09:26, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now listed for deletion at Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion/Log/2009/April/4, where your comments are welcome. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:13, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Lapsed Pacifist (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Amalthea 07:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]