User talk:Mickie777

January 2012

Corazón Valiente

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Corazón Valiente. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Platinum Star (talk) 21:54, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

El Rostro de la Venganza

Your addition to El Rostro de la Venganza with this edit has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Platinum Star (talk) 21:19, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Reina Madre. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. ‑Scottywong | yak _ 18:36, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pasión Prohibida

Please do not remove content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pasión Prohibida with this edit, without explaining why in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Platinum Star (talk) 05:22, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this with us on the Talk Page & give any documentation you may have to prove that Carla Hernandez is not in PP. We are not claiming that Monica is not the female protag. We are not claiming that Carla is the protag at all, just that she is in the show. I don't claim to be infallible nor to have inside info on what Telemundo is doing. I shall be happy to be corrected with proof. (EnochBethany (talk) 00:37, 8 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

December 2012

La Patrona

Please do not add or change content, as you did to La Patrona with these edits, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Platinum Star (talk) 03:09, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ¿Quién Eres Tú?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LNK (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: La impostora (the cast)

No references that speak, to the only confirmed actors are (Lisette Morelos, Sebastián Zurita and Christian Bach.).--Pichu ^{How can I help?} 03:20, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Edits

correct my English is not perfect, what you did to Camelia, la Tejana‎ was copied reference La Impostora and paste everything in another article that I reversed, I do not do business items simply I prefer to have order and do not make a mess in them, like you can always contribute by placing the references, greetings :).--Pichu ^{How can I help?} 09:37, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway I'm done. And if your english is so bad, you just should wait for other users to write it with proper grammar, it doesn't hurt to let someone else do something you don't know. Google translate isn't a good option. And the info in Los miserables actually isn't necessary, telenovelas fans knows where actors acted before and where's no need to know who are rumored for telenovela, because it's a high chance that no one from those will be in novela after all. Eugenio Siller for example is confirmed for Reina de corazones, so his not gonna be in there, Mauricio Ochmann is doing El senor de los cielos. And Elizabeth Gutierrez is not confirmed, but you added her as confirmed already. I'm a big telenovelas fan and if I'm adding something, it means I know for sure it's true. I'm not adding rumored information. Mickie777 (talk) 13:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have references, if not all eventually eliminate,El Señor de los Cielos started last recordings, so it is obvious that it will last many months, Les Miserables, probably debuts in mid-August or July. If the English is so bad because no aid without removing information correct? . also do not see why not add this information is useful and helps to expand the article to make it look a little more consistent. and not an empty thing without references, Soon I will edit in wikipedia is you can be free to do whatever you want :) .--Pichu ^{How can I help?} 00:10, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As I can see, you have no clue about how telenovelas are done, so I'm not even gonna bother to explain it. One last thing, this new way of putting information you used in La impostora page looks very messy. But if you like it, whatever. Just my opinion. I have better sources to look for information than Wikipedia, because here a lot of information is false and if you try to change anything it gets reverted anyway.

I'm sorry the information is not messy, in fact is better that you put a lot of unnecessary things. I put the information is relevant to the item.--Pichu ^{How can I help?} 17:08, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean that information is messy, I meant that the format of input itself looks messy. Older format looked much better in my opinion. And the title "Former main cast" should be changed, because now it means "the main cast that was announced first, but was changed for other people". It should be called "Secondary cast". Mickie777 (talk) 23:44, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I understand you're right, I pass it, but you can change it I'm not refusing to edit the article, we can all edit.--Pichu ^{How can I help?} 02:09, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]