User talk:Mike Diehl

All Wikipedia editors ought to embrace the goal to never provide information that is factually incorrect. Yet many do not. Why they do not is an interesting area of study in and of itself. Mike Diehl (talk) 21:13, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

/* Please add comments below this line. */

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:33, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Reversions of your vandalism of the Mogollon Culture page are not assumption of ownership. They are an attempt to keep the page factually accurate, credible and germane. If you have a complaint, take it to WP:DR rather than engaging in personal attacks on my talk page. Thx. MikeDiehl 22:42, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have made absolutely no vandalism. You keep using Wikipedia terminology and links in ways that have little to do with what you are addressing. These are not personal attacks; they are standard templates. -Uyvsdi (talk) 23:16, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]

The templates are standard. Your claims in posting them to my talk page are false and malicious claims made in bad faith. It's one thing for you to add your fringist revisionist history link to a page purportedly about the study of Mogollon archaeology and another for you to pollute my talk page. MikeDiehl 00:31, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mogollon culture

Thanks for the needed clarification about Oasis America. But as that name is not central to the article, the mention of it does not belong in the lead, so I am going to move it down into the geography section. --Bejnar (talk) 23:49, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. MikeDiehl 05:22, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oasisamerica?

Wondering if you have ever nominated Oasisamerica for deletion? It makes no sense, and you're right, I can't find any mention of it anywhere except Wikipedia. It would be good to get it out of here if it's just a bunch of nonsense. --Tainter (talk) 17:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

===I have not, largely because I don't know how to make such a nomination.MikeDiehl 22:30, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]