User talk:Mitcheldean

Hi Mitcheldean.

The situation with the two Dissident Congress websites is not clear to me. Are you speaking authoritatively on this matter, are you the organizer of the group for example?

--Utinomen (talk) 17:38, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me again!

You mentioned an Indian Dissident Congress? I believe there may also be a Cuban one. Are you in a position to start an article on these?

--Utinomen (talk) 17:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Dissident Congress Yahoo Group was created by Russell White in 2004 and ceased being used as a working forum at the end of 2005. It is officially defunct but remains as an archive of messages for use by certain members of Dissident Congress. The website http://www.dissidentcongress.com is the official Dissident Congress website that was created by Riaz Sobrany in 2006 and is in use today. I am a member of Dissident Congress.

I don't know anything about the Indian and Cuban Dissident Congresses. They have nothing to do with Dissident Congress (UK).

--Mitcheldean (talk) 19:58, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

--Utinomen (talk) 09:05, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mitcheldean

Are you Riaz Sobrany?Mike Keith Smith (talk) 03:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes of course he is. MikeUK27 (talk) 14:13, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What a wanker.

AfD nomination of Dissident Congress / Populist Party (UK)[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Dissident Congress / Populist Party (UK). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dissident Congress / Populist Party (UK). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matthew Yusuf Smith[edit]

The article Matthew Yusuf Smith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Over opionanated blogger with no real importance.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mrodgers2099 (talk) 20:18, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matthew Yusuf Smith for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Matthew Yusuf Smith, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Yusuf Smith until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mrodgers2099 (talk) 12:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]