User talk:Momus

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Momus, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Rob Church ^{Talk | Desk} 22:17, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

GameCube Controller

Thanks for the rewrite of that section, Momus. It's been needing some work since it got put there. Keep up the good work! :) Daniel Davis 02:24, 26 December 2005 (UTC) (Doom127)[reply]

Re: the scabies reference on the Lavos page

Frankly, I'm not entirely sure that the scabies is close enough looking to Lavos to warrant a mention. The behavior you describe is similar enough to a lot of parasites in general, and the general parasite reference has already been made.--BigCow 22:23, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from insults

Hello! Thanks for your contributions to Shadow of the Colossus, but please do not insult people in your edit comments. If you feel the need to make comments, please use the discussion page, but please try to keep things civil. Cheers!
—ZorkFox (ষTalk) 04:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Osgoode Township High School

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - SimonP 06:42, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

YOU ARE A FUCKING GOD

um yeah, just want you to know that the osgoode township thing you did was fucking amazing, and i think you deserve a medal or something. the way you summed up the essence of the school with lines like "Osgoode Township High School is a school, apparently, though you wouldn't know just by looking. Attending said school is an experience comparable to drinking a bottle of glass shards." that was perfection. who are you? i know you would never post your identity on wikipedia, and i would never give you an email address, so figure out who i am, cuz i'm too lazy to figure out you, and send me your contact information. and i'll give you a medal or something.

OR IF YOU SEND ME YOUR CREDIT CARD NUMBER AND ALL YOUR BANK ACCOUNT INFORMATION YOU CAN HELP ME SAVE MY UNCLE. HE IS AN AFRICAN PRINCE, AND IF YOU FORWARD ME $3000.00 IN THE NEXT 48 HOURS HIS FREEDOM WILL BE ASSURED. MY UNCLE IS A GRACIOUS MAN, AND I AM SURE THAT A REWARD WILL BE ENDUED. THIS IS NOT SPAM.

-thanks

Osgoode Township High School

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be given a $5000 US reward and a scholarship to Princeton University. - SimonP 05:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh boy! (Momus 16:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Ottawa Senators

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ottawa Senators. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Mad they're beating the Sabres? ;) --oac (old american century) | Talk 19:53, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haha Sabres lost! Take that vandal! -- Earl Andrew - talk 21:24, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Re. your edit to Tracey Emin. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tyrenius 17:18, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pallasite, you will be blocked from editing. Basilicofresco (msg) 14:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Baklava has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Logan (talk) 01:25, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BAKLAVAAAAAAAAAAAAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.77.251.214 (talk) 01:26, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism of United States

While it's possible that I am completely sympathetic to the statement you want to make, vandalizing a Wikipedia article is definitely not the way to make it. It's ineffective in immediate terms (though I have to admit, your effort lasted an impressive 9 hours) and any repetition of it will get you blocked, crippling your ability to contribute in any positive and productive way here. Please, turn your energies in more useful directions. Peace. DCGeist (talk) 06:52, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stephen Harper, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CharlieEchoTango (contact) 18:39, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

well

what

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]