User talk:N1C4T97

October 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at TAI/AgustaWestland T129, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 11:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to TAI/AgustaWestland T129. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your edit is not in any way supported by the reference. All it says is that Turkey is "conducting preliminary talks" with Azerbaijan, which is very far from Azerbaijan being an operator. From preliminary talks to being an operator takes several years, if an order even is placed. So do not add it again! Thomas.W ^talk 11:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Armed forces

What is the point of putting the figure from 2014 when the 2016 figure is available? Ninetoyadome (talk) 05:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Please be netural on Wikipedia. Your cite on Armed Forces of Azerbaijan about defense budget of army is not true. Don't undo my edit please. N1C4T97 (talk) 18:52, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're using the budget for 2014, the current source says 1.46 for 2016. Azerbaijan decreased its military budget due to the drop in oil prices. Stop your nonconstructive edit. Ninetoyadome (talk) 23:05, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently been editing Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

- Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 09:20, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed required

It has come to my attention that you have recently started to edit in articles related to Armenia and Azerbaijan, this editing area is under a community imposed extended-confirmed restriction. Your number of edits is below the threshold for editing in the area, thus you cannot currently edit in articles and content related to Armenia or Azerbaijan, please refrain from doing so, any edits you have done since this restriction was implemented should be reverted, I will take the liberty of reverting wherever it's appropriate. also, some of your edit violate WP:OR, you should probably give it a good read. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 09:22, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 22:43, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:MedaiBang Paint 28.6 on macOs.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:MedaiBang Paint 28.6 on macOs.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:MedaiBang Paint 28.6 on macOs.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:MedaiBang Paint 28.6 on macOs.PNG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Salavat (talk) 15:25, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I don't get you actually. What do you mean "image within an image"? It's the screenshot of an application. There is no any image inside of that image. Can you elaborate what you mean? Because I am confused a little bit. Thanks N1C4T97 (talk) 18:24, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshots are derivative works because they include elements of a copyrighted software. So, even if your work was featured on the screenshot, the other elements of that image would still retain their copyright. I couldn't find anything suggesting that the software or the screenshot has been released under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License by the software developers. I have also now added a "missing evidence of permission" tag to the file which includes some details on establishing that permission has been provided by the copyright owner if that is something you think could help. See Commons:Screenshots for more information on the copyright rules of Screenshots. Salavat (talk) 01:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediBang Paint moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to MediBang Paint. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MarioGom (talk) 23:22, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Your edit to Kaisen Linux has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 23:32, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kaisen Linux

The article Kaisen Linux has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence found of any notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violation of the WP:GS/AA restriction against edits by non-ECP editors. on the page Azerbaijani Legion, you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:46, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:12, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:MediBang Paint

Hello, N1C4T97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MediBang Paint, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:MediBang Paint

Hello, N1C4T97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MediBang Paint".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]