User talk:NailPuppy

Welcome!

Hello, NailPuppy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 02:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Slemen Article

Hello, I have noticed that you agree with the addition of the 'controversey' section on Tom Slemens article - or at least can see no fault in it. I am aware that the protection on the page should have come down last night but has not, I do not know why. The page was protected because of a 'dispute' but there has been ample time for any objector to argue their case yet non have come forward. The lack of any clear objection surely means that there is no dispute and any edit to the article to remove the section should now count as vandalism. Due to the fact that two editors (you and myself) have stated in favour of the section and no-one has stated against it would it be possible to claim concensus and have the section re-instated? You seem much more clued up than me on Wikipedia policy and I thank you in advance for your contribution. Rjm (talk) 10:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually pretty new to editing as well. I saw that you spoke to User:NonvocalScream about it on his talk page and he mentions the multiple source thing. While the controversy was restored with two sources, the one that directs to forums simply redirects to the icnetwork one. Sorry, but there isn't much I can do for you on this one. I mainly just revert vandalism and try to give a thought here and there when it seems right. Good luck. NailPuppy (talk) 11:02, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Robbie Hummel Article

NailPuppy, I thought my contribution was pretty helpful and insightful. I've heard dozens of accounts that Robbie's high-pitched squeal of a cry was uncanny in its similarity to Oprah Winfrey's. Why don't you go out the real world and clean up real vandalism on local businesses, apartment complexes, etc.? Sound this out backwards for me: k-c-i-d-y-m-k-c-u-s!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjamin2840 (talk • contribs) 23:33, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, NailPuppy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, NailPuppy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]