User talk:Naucatcone

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 10:31, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vasireddy Venkatadri Discussion[edit]

Hi. I will add a biographical data mentioning Vasireddy's descent from a Zamindar family. However, please do not remove the title "Raja". That is how he is referenced in scholarly texts and that is how we must present it - please see the Raja of Bobbili as an example. Callofduty259 (talk) 21:19, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As per your contentions, I have added his descent from the Zamindari family. However, his title was Raja and that is how he will be referenced as that is what reliable texts (Please see the many in that article) reference him as. This is the same rule that applies to other Zamindars like the Raja of Bobbili or the Challapali Rajas. Callofduty259 (talk) 21:25, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Naucatcone do not revert the title of Raja. I have kept his zamindar information - but he is addressed as Raja Vasireddy Venkatadri in numerous sources, such as https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=t-YGAAAAYAAJ&q=raja+vasireddy+venkatadri&dq=raja+vasireddy+venkatadri&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjirq7l0N_iAhUCVrwKHUnNANMQ6AEISTAH. Please do not engage in edit-warring. Please refer to others, such as Raja Ram Mohun Roy or Raja of Bobbili and how there are referenced. We have to follow the same rules for all these figures. Callofduty259 (talk) 19:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full citations please[edit]

Hi Naucatcone, can I impress on you the need for giving WP:full citations? Both the Wikitext editor and the visual editor have buttons for adding citations in proper format. Also, in these edits, it is not clear which content is being sourced to what. Please add the citations closer to the content that they are sourcing. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 20:00, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking[edit]

Hello, I'm Smjg. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Venkatadri Naidu. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Smjg (talk) 11:57, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Sharkslayer87. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kamma (caste) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Sharkslayer87 (talk) 21:34, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vasireddy Venkatadri Nayudu, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:50, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kamma Nayakas for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kamma Nayakas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamma Nayakas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Kamma Nayakas. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:04, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chongqing[edit]

Hello, I noticed you deleted Chongqing from the city proper list. Chongqing is, in fact, a city proper, which means a city defined by the local (municipal) administrative boundary. This is according to the United Nations paper cited on the page. You may be interested in List of largest cities instead, which gives several definitions of Chongqing's population. Mattximus (talk) 13:27, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hyderabad, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:35, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:13, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You've been blocked for creating multiple undisclosed accounts, some of which edit the same articles. In the future, please either keep your edits under one account or clearly disclose the other accounts per WP:VALIDALT. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:13, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Railfan23 (talk) 01:26, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mumbai. Railfan23 (talk) 01:28, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kolkata, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Please do not remove cited content from articles as you did without talk page consensus. Tamravidhir (talk) 03:17, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seek consensus[edit]

Re: this addition and this removal, you have made these changes several times and have at no point opened a discussion to seek consensus for the changes. You need to do this, otherwise, you are likely to be sanctioned for edit-warring. Part of the problem, is that the addition you keep making is poorly written and draws a conclusion that Reddy's actions are not considered freedom fighting before we've even explained to the reader what the controversy is. That's a problem, and that's why it needs discussion. And your removal of this content on the basis that "This is not related to the movie", is a lousy argument when we're in a section analysing historical accuracy, where a historian's view of the subject would absolutely be appropriate. Repeating these edits, is therefore problematic, and you need to open a discussion to figure out what sort of content should actually be there. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:34, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Musunuri Nayakas, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:05, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pemmasani Nayaks, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:33, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 09:43, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]