User talk:Noublyy22

August 2016[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ejiro Okosieme, you may be blocked from editing. Woodstop45 (talk) 15:13, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The information is false.

What information? Woodstop45 (talk) 15:14, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When you nominate a page for speedy deletion, please give a reason for it. Thank you. Woodstop45 (talk) 15:17, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Ejiro Okosieme. Woodstop45 (talk) 15:14, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On Ejiro Okosieme. I've been told by his people to leave his page blank until further notice. Who are you?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Noublyy22 (talk • contribs)

Your recent editing history at Ejiro Okosieme shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Pppery (talk) 18:57, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Ejiro Okosieme. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:17, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring, as you did at Ejiro Okosieme. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — foxj 19:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]