User talk:OliverTwist88

Welcome to Wikipedia!

- Welcome-

Cookies to welcome you!

Hello, OliverTwist88! Thank you for your contributions. My name's Brambleclawx and I just wanted to say hi and Welcome to Wikipedia! If you need help, try looking at some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of the world's largest encyclopædia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name, the date and the time. If you are already loving Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field every time you edit. Again, welcome, and happy editing! Bramble claw x 18:27, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started

Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image

Getting Help

Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention

Policies and Guidelines

Neutral point of view • Reliable sources
Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research
What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons

Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry
Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy
External links • Spam • Vandalism
Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community

Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists

Things to do

Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism

Miscellaneous

Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools User scripts

Further to our chat

I have made a copy of the article, as of 8 July, in User:OliverTwist88/Golden Team. Chzz ► 22:24, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. œ ^™ 20:16, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, OliverTwist88. You have new messages at L Kensington's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Connormah^talk 05:27, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In case you missed it

Please read WP:OWN. Nobody owns articles on Wikipedia. This is a collaborative project. Have you noticed the If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here. under the 'Save page' button? If you don't want it to be 'tampered with', then please do not submit it. Thanks. Connormah^talk 06:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to seriously respectfully suggest that you take a look at Wikipedia's policy on article ownership. Your attitude towards other editors trying to fix article issues is undesirable. Connormah^talk 07:29, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Connormah^talk 07:32, 25 July 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, OliverTwist88. You have new messages at L Kensington's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Connormah^talk 07:35, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:02, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to User talk:L Kensington constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 08:11, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OliverTwist88. You have new messages at Connormah's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Connormah^talk 15:16, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi OliverTwist88 great to see you editing and adding info to Wikipedia. However to add large portions of text they must be references. Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources...If you have any questions pls just let me know. Moxy (talk) 05:35, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i understand. and have reverted my revert :) ..I guess this was moved to main space two early and should still be on a User page ..but o well..i am assuming good faith here and hope refs will follow in the near future.Moxy (talk) 05:56, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Ferenc Puskas4.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ferenc Puskas4.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:35, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Mighty Magyars.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mighty Magyars.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:36, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Sandor Kocsis.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sandor Kocsis.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:50, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Hidegkuti3.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hidegkuti3.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? feydey (talk) 19:50, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Black Army of Hungary

Thank you for your message. I hope I didn't ruin anything you've created. I tried to leave anything intact that was originally in the article and included them in my edits. The tougher part was to find them references since it wasn't me who wrote them (e.g. the comparaison of Matthias to great historical figures). I try to add what I can to the Golden team but I'm mostly interested in tennis articles beside the history ones. But I suggest using huszadikszazad.hu and mvh.dev.nava.hu for older articles but if you have problems reading Hungarian I will happily help to contribute. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 18:14, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I guess there's a "rule" for infoboxes to be on top. So I must say it should be left there, but the next picture can be the one with the pavises. I just one to fit the pictures into the article and not batching them in one place. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 19:42, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Bozsik.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bozsik.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:24, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Buzanszky.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Buzanszky.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:25, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Czibor.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Czibor.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:35, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Grosics.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Grosics.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:55, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Black Army of Hungary

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Black Army of Hungary, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you.

Blocked

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Stubes99 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text

{{unblock|I am not a sock puppet of Stubbs55, I live in San Diego, California.  I have never heard of Stubb55 or know who he is.  I heard he is a Hungarian wikipedian, I'm American and have no relation to him.  Sometimes I don't add notes to my edits which are quite small, that's the only similarity I have with Stubbes55.  The majority of work I've authored is the Golden Team.  This is all a terrible mistake.  Please be so kind as to unblock my account at your earliest convenience.  Thank you dearly. ~~~~}}

below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 14:55, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unblock Me, this is a terrible misunderstanding

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OliverTwist88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First off I'm not a sockpuppet of Stubes55. I live in San Diego, CA, I'm an American and am not affiliated with this Hungarian wikipedian (Stubes55). I've never heard of him until today or know who he is. User Iaaasi has initiated this block on my since I wrote about Hungarian military history for an article that I created, he's reputed to be a Romanian chauvanist from what I read. Initiate an immediate investigation against Iaaasi for these erroneous accusations. The only articles I created where the Golden Team and the Black Army of Hungary, an have created no other. I'm afraid this is all a terrible misunderstanding. Check my IP address against Stubbes55's, I'm in California, he's probably in Europe somewhere, we are completely two different people. Please be so kind as to unblock my account at your earliest convenience. Thank you kindly.

Decline reason:

I've reviewed the behavioral evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stubes99 and find that I agree with the conclusions reached there. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:11, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OliverTwist88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I strenuously demand arbitration or a hearing to clear this matter. I've never heard or know of Stubbes55. Here's the proof: Check my residence location through the use of my IP address (it is in San Diego, California). Then check the residence location of this sockpuppeteer Stubbes55, you'll probably find that he is in Europe. Where's my advocate, who can else I talk to? I need help guys, I've been blocked my mistake.

Decline reason:

This does not address the evidence cited by Beeblebrox. Sandstein 23:45, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You can email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. We don't use lawyers or advocates, and CheckUser is not magic pixie dust. Which is another way of saying checkuser can't be used to prove a negative. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:22, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OliverTwist88, please refrain from personal atacks as per WP:CIVIL. Stop calling me a Romanian chauvanist (it is important to say that this epithet is used very often against me by the socks of the banned user Stubes99: [1]) (Iaaasi (talk) 09:32, 22 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

I'm giving you the opportunity to be unblocked. Please see the note at User talk:GrandMariner. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 20:24, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock this account

I understand that wikipedia has a one username per user rule. HelloAnnoying, please unblock this account 'OliverTwist' instead of 'GrandMariner'. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.25.218.254 (talk) 00:29, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There was also the part about "As long as you're willing to promise not to make edits like these (i.e. threaten other users)". Do you agree to that? --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this user has fulfilled the conditions for being unblocked. After his personal attacks on my talk page, he was promised to be unblocked only if he will revise his behaviour. But he put yesterday on my talk page a message of the same type so he does not seem to have changed his attitude (Iaaasi (talk) 06:11, 23 March 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Just a note

FYI Iaaasi has been granted an indef. block a while ago. I can understand that you were a bit agitated when you made that comment on Iaaasi's talk page the other day, but please understand that you have to keep it cool. Wikipedia is not Usenet where you can engage in all the endless trolling and flame wars your heart can desire. So if you think that you might be able to discuss issues over the Golden Magyars article with Coopuk and others in a calm manner, refrain from emotional outbursts in the future (but only then!) and also refrain evading your block with IP edits and creating additional accounts, go ahead and give your request another try via IRC at #wikipedia-en and #wikipedia-en-unblock channels. But for that you REALLY have to leave your emotional outbursts at the door. CoolKoon (talk) 16:29, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to keep the whole discussion at one place. You don't have to worry about Iaaasi for a while (at least for now...) as he has managed to blow his second chance by an edit war in another article.

Personally I'm not too fond of the "Magical Magyars" title either, because it doesn't mean anything to me (hence I prefer the "Golden Team"). Since it's well-known in the UK though, they MIGHT've had a valid point. As for the changes, there's one thing you obviously haven't bothered with/didn't care about: citing sources and/or citing them often enough. Other editors have repeated countless times that you MUST cite sources and Wikipedia is no grounds to original research. Unfortunately I have to tell you that Coopuk and even Iaaasi (him being especially keen on wikilawyering, gaming the system and making humongous efforts to appear as someone who's encouraging others to abide by the WP policies) were right when they've removed parts of your additions on grounds of lack of sources and others for lack of neutrality. A Wikipedia article's not meant to "praise" or "endorse" anyone or anything. It's meant to provide information about various topics in a neutral manner. Wording such as "One of the most technically superb teams in history" are absolutely unacceptable. If you can cite some sources who say this, do so. E.g. "The team has been called one of the most technically superb teams in history by the majority of sources (citations go here)". One would think that since you're from the US, you've gotten used for this kind of wording from local newspapers (where writing articles without a neutral tone's completely unacceptable)... Unfortunately this might've been also the reason admins sided with Coopuk, Iaaasi and co. instead of you. Please try to stick to these rules and it'll be much harder for others to remove your edits from the article (or undo them). If they nevertheless attempt to do it (especially without any signs of discussion), feel free to report them at WP:ANI quoting the fact that they're vandalizing the page by removing well-sourced content.

As far as HelloAnnyong is concerned I might try to have a heart-to-heart with him, but my chance of success is pretty slim. First of all I'm not an admin, he's also accused me of recruiting a meatpuppet at the SPI investigation of my account started by User:Diannaa. When I've tried to talk some sense into him, he just outright refused to listen to anything I've said, kept repeating that User:Koalicio is my meatpuppet and didn't even bother reacting to my reply. CoolKoon (talk) 12:43, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Lorant.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lorant.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:Lantos.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lantos.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Zakarias.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Zakarias.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]