User talk:Ottawa11

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Ottawa11! Thank you for your contributions. I am HickoryOughtShirt?4 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:21, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Montreal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hi Ottawa11! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. I’m inviting you to join other people who edit conservatism-related articles at WikiProject Conservatism! A friendly and fun place where group members can ask questions and meet new colleagues. You'll also discover DYK: the easiest and funnest way to get your article on the Main Page. I hope to see you there! – Lionel^(talk) 02:01, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Supply management (Canada)

Hi there. I noticed that in this article, you added a reference to this book, however you did not add any page references or other information that allows a reader to determine where in the book you found this information. Could you please cite a page number using {{rp}} or a similar template (eg - add {{rp|236}} immediately after the ref if the info is on page 236). Also, since the source text is not available online, perhaps consider attaching a quotation directly from the source. Thanks. Mind matrix 15:47, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting

Hi, if you are changing from a surname to 'He', and it follows a comma, e.g. on the Jordon Pickford and Patrick Janssens articles, please do not use an upper-case H as this is not grammatically correct. Please use lower-case instead. I haven't checked your edit history but I suspect you have introduced other errors of this nature. Thanks, Nzd (talk) 11:55, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Supply management (Canada)

Mystery shopper is not RS

Hi Ottawa11. Regarding your edit:

The CTV article you use as RS does not include any of your content. It does not mention a Mystery shopping app Field Agent survey. A Mystery shopping app Field Agent survey would not on its own be RS. The word 'stating' is misspelled. Starting a sentence with "though" is grammatically incorrect. The phrase "suggested that American prices were cheaper" is not useful. Please visit the this article's talk page re previous errors.Oceanflynn (talk) 00:04, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Though Mystery shopping app Field Agent conducted a survey stateing that the average national price per litre of 2 per cent milk when purchased in a four-litre container is $1.22 but suggested that American prices were cheaper.^[1]

References

^ Kelly, Rachel (2018-06-27). "Who pays the most for milk? Study finds prices vary widely by city". CTVNews. Retrieved 2018-07-10.

Hi Ottawa11, My sincere apologies for assuming you wrote the sentence you had simply moved.Oceanflynn (talk) 03:47, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maxime Bernier

Regarding controversies

Hello Ottaw11. Regarding your changes, please be aware that large changes should be discussed in the talk page, I hope you understand darling. The controversy is sufficient enough to warrant a new section, please try to be logical or coherent. Thank you sis x PresidentCoriolanus (talk) 19:45, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sis, go discuss this at the talk page please, oml. You honestly, need to use some logical reasoning, and contribute in a constructive way. PresidentCoriolanus (talk) 20:35, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:People's Party of Canada, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Brad v 21:33, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to People's Party of Canada does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Brad v 02:27, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at People's Party of Canada shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Brad v 19:40, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jack Mildren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Halifax—East Hants (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hants

Morgan C. Hamilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Hemphill

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 5 October 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Ottawa11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22977 was submitted on Oct 18, 2018 00:12:32. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:12, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ottawa11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

When I came to check my account, I noticed that I have been blocked because "I may have been used abusively" but it gave no reason in the talk page. I noticed that the user connected to a sockpuppet/Soulspinr who gets blocked because of their obsessive editing on right-wings pages. However, if you look at my editing I have also made edits with pages associated with the Liberals, Parti Quebecois, NDP and sections such as the Film like Marvel Films, Sports such as the NBA, and Music. Look at the Edit Count. Most of my edits have been minor edits that focus on fixing formatting issues, keeping consistent guidelines, grammar or seek approval of other users through the talk page. Not one Wikipedia user ever connected me with the sockpuppet. I am wondering if I need to make a User Page to explain my situation in order avoid confusion? Thanks. Ottawa11 (talk) 16:10, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser-confirmed sockpuppet. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 15:21, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

[1] Kelly, Rachel (2018-06-27). "Who pays the most for milk? Study finds prices vary widely by city". CTVNews. Retrieved 2018-07-10.

[1]