User talk:Pansitkanton

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Pansitkanton, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Senator2029 (talk) 07:25, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. Senator2029 (talk) 07:32, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Boxer Codex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pintado

Visayans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Filipino

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dagami, Leyte (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Waray language

Visayans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Epic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Thanks for the maps of the Philippine languages, and for fixing up the classifications. I didn't realize I'd missed so many! — kwami (talk) 22:15, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, our language articles don't always correspond one-to-one with Ethnologue. SIL tends to be a bit ambitious in carving out new languages, so sometimes one of ours will have more than one ISO code. However, the maps you're making are only a match to one of the codes. Perhaps the articles really should be divided to correspond to Ethnologue, but otherwise the maps should fit the coverage in the article. Eg, Isnag language, Maranao language (+ a bit in Sabah), Surigaonon language, Aklan language, etc. — kwami (talk) 18:17, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so I now got what you meant by this. I did separate maps for Itneg dialects. I'll just merge the maps. Thanks — Pansitkanton (talk) 15:21, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnologue is often inconsistent in what they consider a language, but my consolidations may be inappropriate too, so if you know better than either of us, don't hesitate to split an article, even if that means two articles have to share an ISO code (in such cases, we try to use Linguist List's [abc-xyz] codes, but they don't always exist), or to merge articles with separate ISO codes. Generally, my aim was to have a separate article for every language variety that is unintelligible to others, but not for every ethnic group speaking mutually intelligible varieties, even if Ethnologue counts them separately. — kwami (talk) 19:37, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what are Wikipedia mods' yardstick in creating new language articles, but as I suppose you are specializing or have a background in linguistics, "languages" can only do much as labels most especially if it concerns two or more geographically-contiguous and closely related speech systems. Technically, mutual intelligibility is one basis to classify something as a language more than a dialect of another one. However, as for the case of Norwegian-Danish-Swedish, we generally consider them separate languages despite that linguistic analysis reveals they're more of a Scandinavian dialect continuum. An alternate case for Chinese languages which are called dialects in local discourse, yet are distinguishably unintelligible. What do you guys typically do here on Wikipedia? Do you generally use mutual intelligibility as criteria for a separate article or political labels? There are High German dialects with separate articles. Or I suppose the breadth of content has something to do with that? Personally, since a lot of these dialect clusters I'm working on have barely any substantial literature (grammar, phonology), and since they are linguistically classified as dialects anyway, I suggest they remain under one language article. — Pansitkanton (talk) 19:54, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine by me. It's also fine if you want to merge varieties that Ethnologue distinguishes. I generally go by mutual intelligibility, but others go by official recognition. We've also got the problem of being restricted by our sources, which may use conflicting criteria. Dialect chains are a problem no matter how we approach them. — kwami (talk) 21:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Enchanted Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wizard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Migration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Environment

Ugolino della Gherardesca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Fascist Italy

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Max Planck Institute for Coal Research, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franz Fischer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Visayas

added links pointing to Naga, Toledo, San Carlos, Talisay, Bais, Danao, Catarman, Escalante, La Carlota, Bago and Bogo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Borneo-Philippine languages

Template:Borneo-Philippine languages has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. NSH002 (talk) 16:04, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federalism in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bangsamoro. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Visayans, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Filipino and Indios. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keeping redirects

Per this edit,[1] it's better to keep the language names (Gubat etc.) in the links. Some day the articles may be split, and if they are, your edit will no longer take the reader to the correct article. That's a primary reason for using redirects. — kwami (talk) 22:30, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Austronesian languages

I cleaned this template up a bit, and fixed the duplicate argument error, but several problems remain. The first, and most important, problem is that it is far too big. For details, see WP:NAVBOX, especially "All articles within a template relate to a single, coherent subject". The same applies to Template:Borneo-Philippine languages mentioned above - which just needs to be split into separate templates for the Borneo and Philippine languages, but is otherwise in fairly good condition. See also WP:BIDIRECTIONAL for the basic idea behind navboxes: "Every article that transcludes a given navbox should normally also be included as a link in the navbox so that the navigation is bidirectional." In brief: it needs to be split up!

Also:

It's a bad idea to nest one call of {{Navbox with collapsible groups}} within another one. The whole point is to display all the collapsible sections as closed by default, except for one, which can be specified within an article page when it calls the navbox. It's not possible to do this if it's nested within another call of itself. For the same reason, it makes no sense to specify |state= (except within "noinclude" tags) since the state is implied by the argument passed externally to the navbox calls.
If you want to display a title across the top of a child navbox (which I suspect is your intention here), you can do so using |title=, no need to use the collapsible groups template.
There is little point hiding a very small section within {{Navbox with collapsible groups}}.
Be aware that {{Navbox with collapsible groups}} doesn't solve the problem of large templates, it merely hides it; so does hiding a group using |title=.

Hope this helps. Regards, NSH002 (talk) 11:21, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I never thought of using |title=. This is much more convenient and would help me comply well with Wikipedia standards. Thank you so much! --Pansitkanton (talk) 11:24, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just remember, they still need to be split up (as a rough guide - there are exceptions - a navbox with more than about 50 or 60 entries should be split up). If they aren't split up after a reasonable time, I'll probably nominate them for deletion. Or you can nominate them yourself once they've been split up, since they'll no longer be needed. You could also consider using a footer template to link the resulting smaller templates; for an example, see Template:Japan Academy Award (film) footer. NSH002 (talk) 11:44, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image sizes in articles

Hi. This recent edit of yours caught my eye. It is not uncommon for WP editors to hardcode image sizes which look good to them when articles are previewed on whatever size, resolution, and display geometry they are using. However, I want to ask you to read WP:MOS#Images, particularly the point which reads, "The thumbnail option may be used (thumb), or another size may be fixed. The default thumbnail width is 220 pixels; users can adjust this in their preferences. Lead images should be no wider than "upright=1.35" (by default this is 300 pixels)." Please keep in mind that other WP users may be using different displays and different display resolutions and geomotries than you, and that display sizes and resolutions commonly in use tend to change as technology evolves. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 22:15, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Waray literature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tolosa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Metro Manila Dream Plan

added links pointing to Kawit, Laguna and Balintawak

Cebu Business Park

added links pointing to BDO and Metrobank

Filipino language

added links pointing to Laguna and Czech

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Visayans

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Visayans you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Utcursch -- Utcursch (talk) 00:20, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Visayans

The article Visayans you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Visayans for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Utcursch -- Utcursch (talk) 01:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pansitkanton. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pansitkanton. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exemption

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pansitkanton (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide the IP address privately. Yamla (talk) 12:40, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Filipino cuisine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pansitkanton. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Sunda-Sulawesi languages

A tag has been placed on Template:Sunda-Sulawesi languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:32, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Proto-Visayan language

Hello, Pansitkanton. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Proto-Visayan language".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 16:35, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bajaw language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maluku (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proto-Philippine language

Hi Pansitkanton, good to see you again! Thanks a lot for your edits to Proto-Philippine language, especially about the history of the classification and the changing "boundaries" of the Philippine subgroup. Regarding these edits, I have three comments and suggestions:

You added a lot of important citations, but they are not (yet?) listed anywhere among the references, e.g. Himmelmann (1990), Thomas & Healey (1962), Dyen (1965), Walton (1979), McFarland (1980).
The classification (not "reconstruction") by David Zorc is great, but as you say, "the groupings herein may no longer reflect widely accepted classifications or naming conventions today". "May no longer" is too weak; Southern Philippines and Meso-Philippine are obsolete, and the inclusion of Ivatan, "South extension" (= Central Luzon languages) and North Mangyan within Cordilleran is not supported in later classifcations. Zorc's classification is of historical importance, but coverage should be resticted to a minimum and further balanced by the more recent consensus classifications by Blust and Reid, which are generally accepted, in spite of the fact that these two scholars disagree about the most important point, viz. the validity of the Philippine subgroup itself.
My final point is more of a practical nature. We have two articles here on WP, Philippine languages and Proto-Philippine language. The first article is about the subgroup itself, including the history of the proposal, its accptance, and the internal classification. The second article is about the details of the reconstructed proto-language, such as phonology, grammar (yet to be written), and lexicon. Most of your additions belong – at least imho – to the article Philippine languages, where you will also find the currently accepted subgrouping. So I'd suggest to move the classification part to the existing "Classification" section of Philippine languages, and just leave a {{main}}-tag here. Having too much detail in related articles creates the necessity of synchonizing the information in these articles. Also the "History" section should be moved; a "History" section of Proto-Philippine language should only cover the history of the actual reconstruction of PPh.

We have a lot of language family-related articles here with a distribution of information as I have suggested above for Philippine languages and Proto-Philippine language, e.g. Afroasiatic languages/Proto-Afroasiatic language, Germanic languages/Proto-Germanic language, Dravidian languages/Proto-Dravidian language. So I think it makes sense to apply it to Philippine languages/Proto-Philippine language as well. –Austronesier (talk) 17:13, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Austronesier! It's currently a work in progress which I'll have to edit from time to time. Greatly appreciate your input as always! This'll definitely inform me in how I shape the article (and the others you mentioned). Hopefully this takes a better shape in a couple of days, since I'm also currently reviewing all possible literature I can pull out. –112.206.72.35 (talk) 17:46, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

Hey, good to see you again, it's been a while! Great job with the update of the AN template; it's massive and every re-arrangement is a real challenge. –Austronesier (talk) 14:45, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it really has been a while! Thanks for the positive feedback as always. Other family nav boxes (e.g. IE) aren't as "thick" as the (older) AN version, so I was actually worried if mods would revert my changes because they might become too unwieldy for a nav box. It also bothered me that for years there were many info gaps and the box does not effectively reflect the complete picture of the family vis-a-vis actual articles and updates in the field. From your response it does seem I'm on track. Though, I was thinking if I should still put narrower groupings for more internally diverse branches like those in Meso-Melanesian and North New Guinea. I lumped the languages together because at this point it might look too eye straining if I go 2 more levels, but I feel this is not doing the groupings any justice. What do you think? —Pansitkanton (talk) 18:07, 30 December 2021 (UTC) 18:07, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there are some voices against having a super-large template, but since everything is collapsible, and since templates are not displayed in mobile view, I have less qualms about it. For Oceanic you should get in touch with User:Womtelo for the finer details of the internal classification. I have made some fine-tuning to CMP (I have written a paper about CMP subclassification that will come out soon, so I have to hold quite back with OR); Celebic and South Sulawesi look good. Badaic is tricky, because if Kaili-Wolio is valid, it does not contain Badaic. So a hybrid of the old Kaili-Pamona group and the modern Kaili-Wolio proposal will always be somewhat inconsistent. I have further added a question mark to Totoli and Boano, but removed it from Embaloh. I think the South Sulawesi status of Embaloh and its special link with Bugis-Campalagian are established. –Austronesier (talk) 22:28, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wish we could somehow transclude the smaller templates within the bigger ones. It would make updating and synchronization much easier. –Austronesier (talk) 22:31, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Central Malayo–Polynesian languages

Template:Central Malayo–Polynesian languages has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:44, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]