User talk:Phyl-opus-jackson
Please do not violate Wikipedia policy by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Relevant Directional Changes of Dihydrogen Monoxide, to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Xnuala (talk) 00:54, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
May 2007
[edit]Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Aqueduct on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --Xnuala (talk) 00:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Warning: Vandalism on Santa Claus. using TW
[edit]May 2007
[edit]Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Santa Claus, you will be blocked from editing. D0t 04:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Santa Claus (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 04:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Heinrich Heinz
[edit]An editor has nominated Heinrich Heinz, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heinrich Heinz and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)