User talk:RickH86

Marengo

Thanks for your comment! I've added your references to the page. Referencing a webpage is simple: type <ref> to begin the reference, put the URL in brackets with its title, list the creator or owner of the website, state (if it's listed on the website) when the webpage was last updated, state when you viewed it, and close with another </ref> tag. By the way, I removed the six first-place finishes because it's not in the source; Wikipedia doesn't allow original research, which includes something such as anyone saying "I put this in because I saw it happen". Is there anything else with which I can help you? Nyttend (talk) 12:50, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For an example, see the government section of Perry Township, Logan County, Ohio: a local newspaper is cited as the source for election results. Nyttend (talk) 11:42, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, good idea on including Rick Wanamaker: normally it's not a good idea to include redlinked people in notable people sections, but since you provided a source for his championship, you've proven his notability. Have you ever created a biographical article? Nyttend (talk) 16:18, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A few comments:

If you don't link to them in the text, Wikipedia articles such as Athletics at the 1971 Pan American Games should be linked in a "See also" section, not in the external links

Please don't think I'm saying "horrible article!"; to the contrary, the article was well researched, quite well-formatted (except for the few bits that I noted), and overall a very good article — especially since it was your first! I'm impressed that you discovered the DEFAULTSORT template for your first biographical article; it took me months. Nyttend (talk) 13:44, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thank you for the gong. Much appreciated. Regards,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 16:30, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iowa Valley Community School District has been accepted

Iowa Valley Community School District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

John from Idegon (talk) 09:43, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Travis Fiser has been accepted

Travis Fiser, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MapleSoy (talk) 23:24, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Iowa Barnstar
		For your work on Iowa High Schools and related projects Etriusus (talk) 16:12, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Naming conventions of cities

Re: Liberty High School (Houston)... I moved it back to that title. Here's why:

Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(geographic_names) states: "Cities listed in the AP Stylebook as not requiring the state modifier in newspaper articles have their articles named City unless they are not the primary topic for that name." This is why Houston doesn't have the "Texas". Therefore disambiguation of places in Houston should use "(Houston)". This is because the Associated Press style guide has "Houston" alone, without the "Texas"

Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 00:03, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iowa articles for deletion

Hey Rick,

I note that you're an active member of WP:IOWA.

Can you take a look at these Iowa articles for deletion and either weigh in on the deletion discussions or help improve some of the articles? Some of these small communities may be notable; I've been working on fleshing some of the entries out, but much more work is needed. Your input is appreciated. Firsfron of Ronchester 20:41, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Four Rivers Conference (Missouri)

The article Four Rivers Conference (Missouri) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of independent notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 23:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Added citations RickH86 (talk) 14:55, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Community Consolidated School District 15

I think you left a message on the wrong article. Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 14:19, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Magnolia677: No - there is a in pop culture subsection under Plum Grove Junior High School, I will clarify that this is directed the original author. RickH86 (talk) 14:43, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah...ok! Magnolia677 (talk) 15:46, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Davis County CSD logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Davis County CSD logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:41, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kaysinger Conference for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kaysinger Conference is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaysinger Conference until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.