User talk:Salsakesh
Talk to me.
Hi Salsakesh. I see that you reverted the category change I made to World Salsa Championships. I categorized it under Category:Ballroom dance competitions because ballroom dance says Other dances sometimes placed under the umbrella "ballroom dance" include ... Salsa. As things stand now, your reason for reverting is unclear. Would you please either (1) restore my edit, or (2) revise ballroom dance to exclude salsa (or explain under what circumstances it is not covered by the ballroom dance "umbrella")? Thanks -- Lambtron (talk) 17:46, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- @Lambtron: Hey Lambtron, the keyword there is "sometimes" (the same article also claims that merrengue is sometimes categorized as a ballroom dance, which is silly). You will notice that salsa is not listed as one of the official competition dances as defined by the WDC. The fact that ballroom dance competitions occasionally include salsa does not make the World Salsa Championships a "ballroom competition". They are strictly a salsa competition (or Latin dance, in the case of the WLDC) and do not feature any official dances under the classification of "ballroom dance" (as defined by the World Dance Council). Salsakesh (talk) 17:58, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- The cited quotation led me to believe that salsa generally falls under ballroom dance. If you can, would you please revise ballroom dance to clarify this issue and explain the meaning of "sometimes" (or remove the statement altogether if it's incorrect)? That would be helpful to me and possibly others as well. BTW, my goal here is to diffuse Category:Dance competitions -- any collaboration in that endeavor would be appreciated. Lambtron (talk) 19:28, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- @Lambtron: OK, that makes sense. Maybe you can create a separate category for "Latin Dance Competitions" then? Then the World Salsa Championships page can be broken up into smaller subpages (World Salsa Championships, World Latin Dance Cup, World Salsa Summit, Mayan) and listed there.
- I think the description on the ballroom dance page, as written, makes sense: "Other dances sometimes placed under the umbrella "ballroom dance" include Nightclub Dances such as Lindy Hop, West Coast Swing, Nightclub Two Step, Hustle, Salsa, and Merengue. The categorization of dances as "ballroom dances" has always been fluid, with new dances or folk dances being added to or removed from the ballroom repertoire from time to time, so no list of subcategories or dances is any more than a description of current practices. There are other dances historically accepted as ballroom dances, and are revived via the Vintage dance movement." Salsakesh (talk) 19:37, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
I created Category:Latin dance competitions as you suggested, but I'm still having difficulty understanding the ballroom dance sentences you highlighted. They seem to suggest (in fairly vague language) that salsa is or was at one time ("sometimes") considered ballroom repertoire. The only reason I know it's not the case now is because you told me so. No disrespect, but this section of the ballroom dance article seems to nibble around the edges of important facts without ever making definitive statements. I'd fix it if I could but, alas, I'm here precisely because I'm not an expert on this topic. Lambtron (talk) 21:11, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- @Lambtron: Looks good. I can separate out the different salsa competitions when I have time.
- Regarding ballroom dance in general, the term is very broad and can mean a number of things. From the ballroom dance page: "Ballroom dance may refer, at its widest definition, to almost any type of partner dancing as recreation. However, with the emergence of dancesport in modern times, the term has become narrower in scope. Traditionally, the term refers to the five International Standard and five International Latin style dances."
- So under the first definition, you could say that salsa is a "ballroom dance" in the sense that it is a partner dance that is occasionally danced in ballrooms, although most dancers consider it a "street dance" or "nightclub dance" since it is more commonly danced in those settings. Under the second definition, salsa is not recognized by the WDC as an official dancesport category under the five International & Latin styles. However, there are a few ballroom competitions which include a "nightclub dance" category, under which salsa is sometimes included. So the definition is a little muddy, but someone looking for "Ballroom dance competitions" is probably not interested in the World Salsa Championships. Salsakesh (talk) 21:29, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject Latin music invitation
[edit]
|
You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal. |
Erick (talk) 12:34, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks @Magiciandude: I will check it out.
File source problem with File:Optimizely-logo.png
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Optimizely-logo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:51, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hey Sfan00 IMG, this image is the official logo of the company. My understanding is that articles can reference the official logo of a company for the purposes of the Encyclopedia. Salsakesh (talk) 23:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Opticon (conference) concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Opticon (conference), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Opticon (conference)
[edit]
Hello, Salsakesh. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Opticon".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Salsakesh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Salsakesh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Optimizely-logo.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Optimizely-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Salsakesh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:AnyRoad Logo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:AnyRoad Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your submission at Articles for creation: AnyRoad (July 14)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AnyRoad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:AnyRoad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
The article EntirelyPets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Corporation with no evidence of notability. Sourcing is churnalism and non-RSes. A WP:BEFORE shows press releases; no RS coverage with WP:CORPDEPTH required for notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 19:41, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Orphaned non-free image File:VeVe Company Logo.svg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:VeVe Company Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:David Yu (entrepreneur)
[edit] Hello, Salsakesh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Yu (entrepreneur), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:David Yu (entrepreneur)
[edit]Hello, Salsakesh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "David Yu".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:09, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
The article Tines has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Corporation with no evidence of notability. Sourcing is churnalism and non-RSes. A WP:BEFORE shows press releases; no RS coverage with WP:NCORP required for notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creepTalk 12:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
scope_creepTalk 22:19, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Promotional tone
[edit]Hi! Thanks for asking at User talk:Siroxo#About VeVe and promotional tone! It might take a bit of explaining, as this is such a common problem on Wikipedia, by no means unique to VeVe.
So the first issues is that the information presented doesn't go into much depth about what makes the app significant, interesting, or notable. It mostly provides a company profile and history listing some business deals. Most of this is tangential background. A bit of this may be useful in an article on the app, but here it's given too much attention, relative to the app itself.
With tech products especially, it's extremely easy to fall into the trap of finding what look like secondary sources and putting the key piece of information in the article with a citation. The problem, and the reason behind guidelines like WP:CORPDEPTH is that this information is rarely truly secondary and independent.
I would recommend finding one or two in-depth secondary sources (and for something like this, suggest ones that meet WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:PRODUCTREV) that are completely independent, and reading them with some detail. Based on the reading, figure out why the source wrote the article, and then summarize those points as the core of the article, and highlight them in the lead. Maybe there's something about who's using the app, or something interesting about the way it came into being, or maybe it's doing something novel in the way it's approaching NFT sales, right now I'm not sure what makes this app notable.
Once you have that core it's fine fill in some necessary gaps with some ABOUTSELF claims from press releases or routine coverage, etc.
Beyond this, note that there's a bit of a "promotional voice". Essentially, playing up the subject to make it sound ... better in some way. It's hard to unlearn this "promotional voice". Many of us have to use it every day as part of our jobs, even just in playing up our own abilities. I catch myself doing it plenty, and I'm sure I sometimes don't catch myself
Here's a couple concrete examples of the promotional voice from VeVe
- The use of "business" jargon and buzzwords: Eg. "The app serves as a platform for the buying and selling of licensed digital collectibles, utilizing non-fungible token (NFT) technology." Now I'm not precisely sure what this app is, but here's a slight improvement "The app is a storefront for non-fungible tokens (NFTs)".
- Another example is the name-dropping in the lead. If there is a specific brand that they are particularly notable for working with, it might be reasonable to include it in the lead. But the list of brands is promotional, even if that's not what's intended.
There are other similar issues later in the article.
I hope this answers your question. —siroχo 04:58, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)