User talk:Sandmanwaves
To anyone who wants to tell me my edits are wrong : my apologies in advance -- I worked on literally THOUSANDS of Wikimedia pages for a website that has disappeared, so some of the bad habits I picked up there (which are not Wikipedia policy) will probably die hard. I'm definitely going to resort to muscle memory for some things. Sandmanwaves (talk) 21:01, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonatype (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
* (talk) 21:15, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
---
Thanks User:Celestina007 for the notify -- I wouldn't have seen the delete post without your note. :) Sandmanwaves (talk) 22:25, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
The article PhotoDemon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No credible claim of significance, and no in-depth reliable sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MarioGom (talk) 18:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC)