User talk:Seewoester
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
Thank you for submitting an article at Wikipedia:Articles for Creation. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rebecca L. Schiff. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article and resubmit when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 22:28, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
Your nomination at Articles for Creation was declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rebecca L. Schiff was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to request article creation again once the issues have been addressed. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bradjamesbrown (talk) 14:29, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Rebecca L. Schiff
[edit]Well, when I looked at the article, I don't see her passing WP:PROF, but, as you're a registered user, you don't need to use the articles for creation process. You may click this link and create the article, where it will be analysed by the community at-large.
If you choose to do this, please find more third-party sources to add to the article. Academics ranking below full professor are rarely notable, but it has been known to happen, but since her position doesn't make her notable, you're going to need many more sources that Dr. Schiff is totally unconnected to. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 18:57, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
In this case, Schiff is notable in that she has recently added significantly to the body of theoretical knowledge in the civil-military relations field. I agree that more third party references are required, but they are out there and that can be readily accomplished. Inbody (talk) 15:28, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rebecca L. Schiff, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 04:32, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission Rebecca L. Schiff
[edit]
Hello Seewoester. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Rebecca L. Schiff.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rebecca L. Schiff}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 15:32, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Rebecca L. Schiff for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rebecca L. Schiff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca L. Schiff until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)