User talk:Shadowjams

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Sad

Sad to see you leave. — Lentower (talk) 13:32, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Community desysoping RfC

Hi. You are invited to comment at RfC for BARC - a community desysoping process. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:44, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

		What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar
		Awarded for launching WP:SVT. I'm sorry I didn't get a chance to send this your way before you retired. I deeply appreciate your encouraging words at ANI all those years ago when I first reported a case of sneaky vandalism to the admins who couldn't see the vandalism staring them in the face. It was very good to know that I wasn't just growing paranoid and that there were others (i.e. you) who could see what was really going on. I've directed several others to SVT in the years since then. Thanks for your brilliant anti-vandalism work! Please come back when you've had a bit of a breather from this place. -Thibbs (talk) 04:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"RAAAAAAAAANDY" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect RAAAAAAAAANDY. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 4#RAAAAAAAAANDY until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 17:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Diggs

The article The Diggs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Among the sources on page are two interviews which don't clear, one review from Losing Today which might be a blog (or at least doesn't look overly reliable), and a very short piece from Gothamist. Of all the things not in this article, I was surprised to find two reviews from AllMusic. I don't see enough between those and Gothamist to pass notability, and the rest is unreliable. Found nothing else.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QuietHere (talk) 22:05, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes

The Certified Financial Forensic certificate has become very important with social welfare systems and investor relations. The International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes when the Secretary General receipt and acknowledgement notices rule 8 fact finding committee, that a member shall have specific qualifications or expertise. Drazdik313 (talk) 16:10, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Open Fire(album)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Open Fire(album) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 16 § Open Fire(album) until a consensus is reached. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:A165:7AFC:68F9:104D (talk) 17:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]