User talk:Shpoffo

Welcome!

Hello, Shpoffo, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like working here and want to continue. If you need help on how to name new articles, look at Naming Conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the Manual of Style. If you need general help, look at Help and the FAQ, and if you can't find your answer there, check the Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and the Policy Library. Also, don't forget to visit the Community Portal — and if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my New-Users' Talk Page.

Additional tips:

Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:

If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
You might want to add yourself to the New User Log
If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language

Happy editing!

Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 13:03, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Gematria of Nothing

Gematria of Nothing has been proposed for deletion. Please see the article for details. NickelShoe 04:33, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Order of the Cedars

A tag has been placed on Order of the Cedars, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking 01:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aether theories

In your recent edit, commented as:

External articles, references, and further readings - added ref for inviscid fluid text.

you deleted the entire "further readings" section. Could you put it back, or justify removing all these on the talk page? PaddyLeahy 09:26, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Optical methods in art in 1430

Hi Shpoffo, In case you're still reading this... I noticed that you added the entry about optical methods used to create art in the year 1430. That edit] was years ago, but I'm interested to know what you were referring to, and whether you have a source with more information. Thanks! --Amble (talk) 19:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]