User talk:Shubham010000

May 2022[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Yakub Memon, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. University attendance is normal biographical content - please do not remove such details. Iskandar323 (talk) 13:02, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ashis Nandy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Iskandar323 (talk) 13:05, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 18:21, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #76456 [edit]

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shubham010000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Its been a long time when i made some edits in Yakub Menon's page removing certain educational points which were written in way to praise him. Secondly,i had an argument with an editor regarding PFI which are banned two years back.The editor was removing the word extremist from their page.I just said that it might have legal consequences as PFI has already been named in mutliple extremism cases and it will anyways be banned soon so its better not to make them look like some normal political party as it might have legal consequences.And i was right,witin days,alll of PFI was banned and all of its senior members were arrested.Considering that this case had happened 2 years back,i think i should get my editing privilege back as i am ready to Therefore i reuqest you to unblock me.

Decline reason:

This leads me to think you mistakenly believe your edits were appropriate. They weren't. Until you can demonstrate you understand they were inappropriate and convince us you won't repeat them, we'll leave you blocked. Yamla (talk) 11:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shubham010000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I accept that my edits were inappropriate and apologies for them and assure you that it won't happen again in future. Considering that those edits were made 2 years ago, a long time has passed and I have come to that realization that those edits were made in hurry which led them to be appropriate. Therefore, I request you kindly unblock me and give my chance.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:10, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.