User talk:Sikonmina

Welcome!

Hello, Sikonmina, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! House1090 (talk) 00:41, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sikonmina (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

External links are not allowed to contain relevant links if they constitute WP:SPAM.Sikonmina (talk) 05:48, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Then you must make a case for it and achieve a consensus to do so, instead of engaging in a large scale removal even despite other editors attempting to engage with you. This is a collaborative project and you cannot simply impose your will on it by fiat. 331dot (talk) 09:51, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Let me add that deleting the warnings you received does not erase them. If you continue this behavior on the expiration of your block, I will reblock indefinitely. Enough time has been wasted here on your removal of citations and links. -- ferret (talk) 15:39, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sikonmina (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How did I violate WP:BRD? Are you not assuming food faith User:331dot? The previous concern was DPRP being a reliable source and valid link. What is the problem now? Is it progarchives or some other link? Hypocrites. Sikonmina (talk) 03:14, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unlike most circumstances in life, calling people hypocrites while asking them to do something for you doesn't work too well on Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:04, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Per WP:KEEPDECLINEDUNBLOCK you are not allowed to remove any declined unblock requests while the block is active. Lavalizard101 (talk) 11:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sikonmina, in combination with your issues described above, you almost certainly don't understand how Wikipedia works, which takes a while to learn. Most people start with about 5,000 lower-key edits to do that before moving out of low key. If you want to recover, you're certainly going to need to chill out, and that described process would probably be a good next step after that. North8000 (talk) 15:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zdnf, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Atlantic306 (talk) 20:52, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Zdnf per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zdnf. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. firefly ( t · c ) 22:23, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]