User talk:Simon Dempsey

David Thorne

Can you please explain your reversions with this article? You are removing pertinent references and adding unused ones. Thedarxide (talk) 16:51, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is, the subject's website is considered a primary source. Also, phrases such as "It is this sense of normality that has made him one of the most interesting and exciting writers on the internet today." Are not only original research, but are also non-neutral. Thedarxide (talk) 06:36, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The edit warring needs to stop. Where claims are made that someone said something, they need citing. There is no evidence that all that adding a source to an employment claim is causing "personal harm". Thedarxide (talk) 13:21, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've still not addressed the rest of the article that you keep changing. When you write "Thorne states...", you need to say where. By claiming that he started two companies, you need to provide evidence (and not by copying and pasting from de Masi Jones website). If David is so concerned about his safety then perhaps his bio should be removed from the company's public website. Thedarxide (talk) 17:01, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest; it appears that you may have one. Thank you. --NE2 03:49, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:David Thorne Writer.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:David Thorne Writer.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 03:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:David Thorne 27bslash6.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:David Thorne 27bslash6.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Help:Reverting. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ^Chillum 00:28, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article David Thorne, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Crafty (talk) 02:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My Undo of your Edit to David Thorne (writer)

My apologies for undoing your reversion of an edit in that article. My undo was in error. Regards, Crafty (talk) 22:26, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. You actually have FIVE reverts in less than 24 hours. Even if it's vandalism, let someone else handle it. --BlackAce48 (talk) 01:47, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually WP:3RR does not apply to reverting vandalism. Sorry for not knowing sooner. But still good job for reporting that vandal. --BlackAce48 (talk) 02:33, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting vandalism. ^Chillum 03:19, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN/I

Hello, Simon Dempsey. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Signing comments

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. —Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:59, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

I suggest that you read WPs referencing policy. Primary sources (Thorne's website) are to be avoided - I've pointed this out to you before. 3rd party sources are always better, and "B Grade" is your own personal opinion. I've also raised the concern previously that your only existence on this site is to positively spin the Thorne article. Repeatedly removing others contributions in favour of your own variations is frowned upon. Thedarxide (talk) 11:51, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:David Thorne promo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:David Thorne promo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Thedarxide (talk) 11:55, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Simon Dempsey. You have new messages at Thedarxide's talk page.
Message added 12:32, 3 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Thedarxide (talk) 12:32, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]