Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

User talk:Specialsam110

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Back to the Future (musical), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 18:20, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Resident Alien (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alien. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ST9. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 7#ST9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:33, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Showrunner

[edit]

Hi. Thank you. for working to improve the site with your edit to Showrunner, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. I know you don't edit here that often, but since you've accumulated about 500 edits here since May 2015, you may have learned that Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 18:34, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for letting me know. I didn't actually add any information, I just reworded a clumsily written statement that was already not sourced. Specialsam110 (talk) 18:15, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! We can't use original research either. Please only add what comes from independent, reliable sources. Star Mississippi 16:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you can help me then. According to WP:PLOTSUM, references to the primary source are allowed in plot summaries. How else would the plot summary be written if not from an account of someone who saw it? Specialsam110 (talk) 16:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Specialsam110. That's a how to guide, which doesn't have even guideline status, whereas Wikipedia:No original research is policy. As one option, you could use published reviews, which frequently address elements of the plot Star Mississippi 16:17, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe I should have cited MOS:PLOTSOURCE, which appears to say the same thing? The primary source is the source for a plot summary.
I've edited countless plot summaries before and never had to cite anything. The plot summary for Hamilton (musical) has no citations. Nor does the summary for Oklahoma!. Most reviews are written to avoid spoiling things so it's absurd to say that they could be sources for a plot summary. Full summaries of films are posted hours after their Thursday night previews. This show opened months ago. Specialsam110 (talk) 16:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
are encouraged to add sourcing if possible, as this helps discourage original research
What you added was, by your own admission, original research based on your viewing of the show. I think PLOTSOURCE leans toward more of a summary, not two full unsourced paragraphs. That said, there seems to be disagreement on this so I won't remove it again if you re-add it. Star Mississippi 18:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Someone else added their own plot summary since then, supposedly copied directly from the Cast Album booklet. I know I've seen this before, but is that encouraged or not? Specialsam110 (talk) 19:35, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That is not allowed either as a copyvio and I have removed it. Pinging @Starendipity to this discussion, but will leave a pointer on the article talk Star Mississippi 19:41, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hi Specialsam110! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at The Rocky Horror Picture Show that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. AussieWikiDan (talk) 04:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

[edit]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Fall of the House of Usher, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please review WP:IPCV as well. DonIago (talk) 16:03, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Cullum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Law and Order.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Three Little Pigs (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 22:21, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bluey (2018 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dalmatian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per our policy on citing sources, when you add facts to Wikipedia articles, please cite your sources. Especially when you add a popular culture reference, you need to not only cite your sources, but establish the importance of the reference. See WP:IPC. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming this is relating to the H.M.S. Pinafore reference in The Suite Life of Zack and Cody that I added to the Pinafore page, I edited it to cite the episode itself as a source, as the Mr. Belvedere example does. Specialsam110 (talk) 13:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]