User talk:Srinubabuau6

Welcome

Hello, Srinubabuau6, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Guillaume2303 (talk) 17:33, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

April 2012

Hello Srinubabuau6. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article OMICS Publishing Group, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 13:58, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ziruk District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cedar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tamil Nadu Vanniyar Public Properties Welfare Board, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Encroachment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:04, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

John W. McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Studies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Public Affairs

Mahasarakham Business School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Financial management

Mar Athanasius College of Engineering (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to MCA

Operational planning (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Operational plan

Sexual dimorphism in non-human primates (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Troglodytes

St. Gregory Barbarigo School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Immaculate Conception School

Suzhou Polytechnic Institute of Agriculture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Environment

Victoria Cool Aid Society (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Emmanuel Baptist Church

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Inclusive business may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

about including the poor in the business process be it as producers or consumers.<ref name=endeva>{{http://www.endeva.org/fileadmin/user_upload/publications/em-eg-eng-ES-lowres-korr_FINAL.pdf p.1.</

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:18, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Slemani Polytechnic University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Kurdish and Baccalaureate

Timeline of theoretical physics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Parity and Electromagnetic

Wildlife smuggling hubs in Asia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Linxia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Dragon's Lair, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 00:42, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Close paraphrasing

Hi. I'm afraid many of your recently created articles, such as diafiltration, phosvitin and immunoadsorption may be a problem under our copyright policies, since the text seems very closely paraphrased from its sources. While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation – including both structure and language – are. For an example of close paraphrasing, consider the following:

Immunoadsorption is one of the dominant blood purification technologies and mainly applied to remove antibody, immune complexes and some other pathogentic factors from the blood with some kind of adsorbent.

The immunoadsorption article says:

The technology which is used for blood purification mainly applied to remove antibody, immune complexes and some other pathogenic factors from the blood with a kind of adsorbent is referred to Immunoadsorption.

There are other passages that similarly follow quite closely.

As a website that is widely read and reused, Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously to protect the interests of the holders of copyright as well as those of the Wikimedia Foundation and our reusers. Wikipedia's copyright policies require that the content we take from non-free sources, aside from brief and clearly marked quotations, be rewritten from scratch. So that we can be sure it does not constitute a derivative work, these articles should be revised to separate them further from their sources. The essay Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism". Kolbasz (talk) 17:38, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop! Instead of continuing to create closely paraphrased articles, start fixing your previous articles. Kolbasz (talk) 17:46, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Whiting event

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Srinubabuau6, thanks for creating Whiting event!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. 2

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:31, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Osteomesopyknosis

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Srinubabuau6, thanks for creating Osteomesopyknosis!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. 3

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:37, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Diafiltration may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

containing [[Protein|proteins]], [[Peptide|peptides]], [[Nucleic acid|nucleic acids]], and other [[Biomolecule|biomolecules] by a technique called Diafiltration.It is used for [[ultrafiltration]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:51, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nucleoplasmin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chaperone

Phosvitin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Inhibitor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:40, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Biospeleology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Whiting event may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*{{cite web|url=http://www.avto.aslo.info/lo/toc/vol_42/issue_1/0133.pdf|title=Whiting Event: Biogenic

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:52, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Orseolia oryzae may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

]<ref>{{cite web|title=Characterization of Indian biotypes of the rice gall midge, Orseolia oryzae (Wood-Mason (Diptera:Cecidomyiidae)| url=http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract;

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:56, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hyalophysa chattoni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Order (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Parthenolecanium persicae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of theoretical physics

It looks like you've done a lot of work on Timeline of theoretical physics, so I thought I'd let you know I did a review and posted some comments about ideas for making it a good quality and well-read page. See Talk:Timeline of theoretical physics Hope that helps!--CaroleHenson (talk) 05:36, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

International Flame Research Foundation

As you have contributed, I am letting you know that I am nominating this article for deletion. It has been filled up with material copied from websites which is both copyright violation and an attempt at advertising. I created this article, and would have been grateful for proper additions from referenced third party sources. I do not blame you - all you have done is add links.Chemical Engineer (talk) 00:38, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Biophysical Society may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[[British Biophysical Society}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sports Medicine Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doctors (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hong Kong Medical Association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Srinubabuau6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notification for reviewing my block. I have not abused multiple accounts and neither do I have any sockpuppets. I have received no appreciation for my edits. Can any one review? Srinubabuau6 (talk) 13:40, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 18:46, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You had used {{unblock reviewed}} rather than {{unblock}} so nobody knew you had requested to be unblocked. I've now corrected this. I won't review the block myself, but from the sockpuppet investigation there was strong technical behavioural evidence linking you to the other accounts so it is unlikely you will be unblocked. SmartSE (talk) 16:52, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]