User talk:StarWarsGlenny

May 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nikki Haley has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nikki Haley was changed by StarWarsGlenny (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850588 on 2018-05-06T21:56:23+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:56, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 03:04, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 03:52, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:10, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, I'm Gilo1969. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Casual wear have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. GILO A&E⇑ 20:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bluffworks

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bluffworks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GILO A&E⇑ 20:23, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Blazer. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:47, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gramercy Blazer

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gramercy Blazer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:47, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Gramercy Blazer, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. GILO A&E⇑ 18:59, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Gramercy Blazer. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. GILO A&E⇑ 19:01, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marko Kolanovic

Hello StarWarsGlenny,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Marko Kolanovic for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 04:20, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Marko Kolanovic, you may be blocked from editing. SamHolt6 (talk) 05:36, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marko Kolanovic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marko Kolanovic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marko Kolanovic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 07:11, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Casual wear, 2010s in fashion, Blazer, Streetwear, An American Tail: The Treasure of Manhattan Island, and Smart casual, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. —Madrenergic^talk 06:21, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —Madrenergic^talk 06:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edintg

Hello, I have across some of your edits and I am on the fence as to how to go about this. Judging from your edits, a lot of them appear to have been made in good faith. However, your lack of proficiency in the English language and lack of regard when it comes to punctuation frequently leaves other users having to clean up the mess or to revert your edits. Perhaps it would a good idea for you to refrain from making any major edits until you get a handle on these issues. It sucks when others have to clean up after you.

Additionally, your unwarranted removal of content and the equally unwarranted addition of apparent promotional material isn't doing anyone any favors, as is evidenced from this talk page. Thank you. Jay D. Easy (talk) 11:10, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Suit (clothing). 2601:243:903:3F5B:BC4E:56C0:3D1D:1E9B (talk) 00:08, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

please forgive me someone hack in my account I did not post pictures on George H W Bush — Preceding unsigned comment added by StarWarsGlenny (talk • contribs) 00:12, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My account wasn't hack excute me I don't think it I do post pictures of. George H W Bush page — Preceding unsigned comment added by StarWarsGlenny (talk • contribs) 00:14, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 09:04, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]