User talk:Starklinson/2018

2018

Problem with latest changes on infoboxes and data alignment

The changes you did lately on several YouTuber infoboxes, removing the "module" parameter and moving up the alma mater data to wrong parameters, are causing data to look weirdly aligned on the infobox. You should stick to the YouTuber infobox documentation and use the module parameter as it is intended to, even if the alma mater data has to be on the bottom of the infobox, because "nationality" and other parameters are not the right places to put embedded infoboxes. Perhaps you could ask someone on Template talk:Infobox YouTube personality to add that parameter natively to the infobox if you think it is important that it appears so high on the infobox.--Manbemel (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just for your knowledge, I just discovered that the YouTuber infobox has a native parameter called "education" which is where you can include the alma mater data.--Manbemel (talk) 13:13, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, I'm TAnthony. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Jonathan Van Ness, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — TAnthony^Talk 18:55, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of YouTubers

There is another deletion discussion on List of YouTubers. If you would like to weigh in, you can do so by checking out the discussion here. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 07:37, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Needs Article

When editing List of YouTubers, you need to read the page notice. It says every entry needs an article. Machaizelli Kahey has no article. Therefore I reverted your edit. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 03:14, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Duncan Pain concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Duncan Pain, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Duncan Pain

Hello, Starklinson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Duncan Pain".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:45, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Joshua Rush, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 06:01, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Joshua Rush. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. General Ization ^Talk 06:02, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Joshua Rush. General Ization ^Talk 06:04, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Joshua Rush shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. General Ization ^Talk 06:13, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Starklinson. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]