User talk:SteelersFan UK06

Hello there.

“ How happy is the blameless vestal's lot,
The world forgetting, by the world forgot.
Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind,
Each pray'r accepted, and each wish resign'd. ” — Alexander Pope, "Eloisa to Abelard"

The Steelers Fan

Home	Talk to me	X!'s edit counter	Userboxes	Contributions	E-mail me	All subpages

Drop me a line, if you feel the need.

Your GA nomination of Field Day (festival)

The article Field Day (festival) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Field Day (festival) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

RE: "What will happen next, we have the clues."

Heh, it's by These New Puritans. WELL worth a listen, YouTube "Elvis". Post punk at its finest. Also, I'm worried now that Kele's going solo, Russel's writing awful songs with some Yank and Moakes is in some metal band I can't remember the name of off-hand, that Bloc Party might be no more. Hope not.

Anyway, you going to T?  f o x  09:59, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Their first album is much better to listen to than their second, I think. Hidden's a little too arty for my day-to-day taste. I also reckon if Bloc Party did get back together they're going to get more dancey still (which is a good thing for me, but I still appreciate how brilliant Silent Alarm was). Ah well...

That's a ridiculous number of festivals for one year! I was considering going to Rockness (it's only a hundred miles up the dual-carriageway) but never did. It's just T in the Park, my first ever festival, and my second ever gig. ;) Excited for it, greatly.  f o x  14:01, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Really? You don't know a Bloc Party fan who doesn't like Flux? It's probably (bar Mercury) their most divisive song. I mean, I love it, but a lot of 'fans' don't. Ah well. I also think that was a fairly unreliable source. That was in the Bloc Party article for a while, unreferenced, heh.

Heh, I'm sure there are plenty! ;) The first (and only) gig I've been to was Franz Ferdinand supported by Editors and The 1990s back in 2005... Ahhhh, memories ;)  f o x  12:46, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

A letter off. But yeah, you're in Scotland? Since when? ;P  f o x  14:58, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Oops, sorry about the slow response. Stuff came up. That's awesome ;P Probably the same tour. Nobody ever comes here these days; well, except to bars and things, and I'm pretty screwed then (the new law about under eighteens in pubs after eight usually shoots me right down, heh). Oh well. As for albums, I'm not good at predicting stuff (I'm usually about a year behind, anyway; only bought Only Revolutions and xx recently. Haha. But I like Kele's new one. I forget its name. And I'm heavily tipping Dog Is Dead for this year. Wow.  f o x  08:38, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for The Edge Festival

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

TUGS Wikipedia book

Wikipedia has recently created a new feature where you can purchase physical books which consist of all copies of the articles on the particular subject. I've taken the time to create one on the subject of TUGS which you can see here: Book:TUGS. All you see there you can then download as a pdf or purchase a physical copy of it which would be great for any TUGS fans. Hope you enjoy it and if you do want to add more to it or change some things about, please be aware that we don't want to clutter it too much with anything that although relevant may seem unecessary. --Victory93 (talk) 09:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Picture quality

Hello. I noticed that you are an active member of WikiProject Spirits. If you have time, I would appreciate it if you could weight in on the picture quality for Bärenfang on the talk page below:

Talk:Bärenfang#Picture_Quality

Thank you very much! WDavis1911 (talk) 07:49, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Consider it done. Thanks for letting me know! --^{SteelersFanUK06} HereWeGo2010! 01:46, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The Dykeenies - New Ideas.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:The Dykeenies - New Ideas.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ^{SteelersFanUK06} HereWeGo2010! 01:04, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The Dykeenies - New Ideas.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:The Dykeenies - New Ideas.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip [i.e. a Word document or PDF file] that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ^{SteelersFanUK06} HereWeGo2010! 01:05, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Dykeenies - New Ideas.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Dykeenies - New Ideas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dykeenies-newideas-willithappentonight.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dykeenies-newideas-willithappentonight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Klaxons NME cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Klaxons NME cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Klaxons discography

-- Cirt (talk) 18:04, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Check this

User_talk:Cabe6403#File:SFCityHall.png_is_now_a_Valued_Picture

I had no idea this even existed. Been out of the game too long. But still, only 212 valued pictures (at time of writing) and mine is one of them :) - Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 23:25, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Any verification on this?

If you search down here: 2011 in home video, says TUGS is being released. I highly doubt it but can we get any verification on this? I've been searching on google but nothing seems to match. --Victory93 (talk) 01:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

• Yeah its looking alright. Well for the fact that it now has references and I doubt anyone else would in future try to improve it, glad that its you. --Victory93 (talk) 03:49, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Klaxons

Yes, let's not have an edit war, bit of a silly topic to have one over. I'm a friend of the band and I love the old version and find the later one almost un-listenably bad - something to do with the keyboard line they put over the top of it. Anyway, of course "re-recorded" is fine. Let's not fight. Happy New Year! Bienfuxia (talk) 12:09, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Could you use these as reliable sources?

On the fansite Sodor Island, they have what appears to be interviews from crew of the series which can be found here:
http://www.sodor-island.net/tugs20th.html

as well an interview with David Mitton found here:
http://www.sodor-island.net/interviews.html

Just wondering if any of these could help in improving the TUGS articles. As well maybe could we try to get the TUGS article to Good Article status and maybe even try to get it featured? --Victory93 (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

• I've just requested the article to be reviewed so the possibility to have it become a featured article as well I added to the article the information from the SiF site from David Mitton. Might want to have a look to see if its alright as well the review archive you can see here: Wikipedia:Peer review/TUGS/archive1. --Victory93 (talk) 04:26, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Just to let you know, there's an update on the article Wikipedia:Peer review/TUGS/archive1 if you'd like to check it out and see what would need updating fixing. --Victory93 (talk) 00:58, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

New TUGS article

Hey I created a new TUGS article: List of locations in TUGS. Pretty much squeezing out as much information as I can. Make any improvements needed if you like. --Victory93 (talk) 09:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Yo dawg

I heard you like lists

Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 15:16, 25 February 2011 (UTC) (UTC)

New TUGS interview

Hey thought you'd be interested, fansite Sodor-Island have released a new interview with one of the modellers for Thomas and TUGS. Reveals some new behind-the-scenes information about the show. You can find it here. --Victory93 (talk) 07:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi, sorry not been on Wikipedia in ages. Got an email about this (that must be a new thing I've missed!). Going to get back to writing in a big way fairly soon. Is that website now the de facto forum for TUGS? Good find and keep up the good work on here. --^{SteelersFanUK06} AFC2k10 18:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Well it's a reliable Thomas fansite which also features things about TUGS and of course these interviews do help explain some of the behind-the-secens bits about the series. It's probably the only reliable TUGS related site on the web. Of course there might be others but this is the only which gets updated. --Victory93 (talk) 10:11, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Z-Stacks Full.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Z-Stacks Full.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:22, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Chapel Studios for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chapel Studios is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chapel Studios until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Brown (talk) 15:08, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Farewell to the Fairground.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Farewell to the Fairground.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:29, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Robert D. Cardona.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Robert D. Cardona.PNG. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 22:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

WIKIBROS

Hey man, you edit wikipedia at all these days? I'm finding that since I'm not splitting my life between uni/work/fusion/iaeste/sleep I actually have time to go on wikipedia again :o I've been trawling through policy pages, back-of-house stuff and projects as opposed to many mainspace edits.

CAN WE BE WIKIBROS AGAIN? Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 14:45, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

List of recurring Tugs characters

I was thinking of copyediting this article, but wanted to recommend that it be renamed to List of Tugs characters so that it is consistent with other television guides that feature an extensive character list. -AngusWOOF (talk) 01:55, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of List of minor Tugs characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of minor Tugs characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of minor Tugs characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 23:53, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Z-Stacks Full.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Z-Stacks Full.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Other Characters in TUGS listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Other Characters in TUGS. Since you had some involvement with the Other Characters in TUGS redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Horrors - She is the New Thing CD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Horrors - She is the New Thing CD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Clearwater Periscope lens system

The article Clearwater Periscope lens system has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has been merged with the article it is most associated with and therefore doesn't need to exist.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeffreyLoeber (talk) 16:49, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Meow!

You created this, right?

Qwerty number1 has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your kitten must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{subst:Kittynap}}

THANKS! I love it! Qwerty number1 (talk) 18:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject TUGS

Template:WikiProject TUGS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:41, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TUGS-RfC

Template:TUGS-RfC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:20, 5 September 2024 (UTC)