User talk:Sumdog

Yellow Deli

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Yellow Deli, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add better references to the article. Thank you. Weaponbb7 (talk) 19:07, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yellow Deli Was Properly Cited

I have no idea what Weaponbb7 is talking about. I cited two well know legitimate sources: an Australian journal based in Sydney and the Chattanoogan (a well respected web publican read by thousands of people in Chattanooga). I have reverted the change and left a message on his talk page. If he wants to dispute the criticism section, he should add a new section, 'Response to Criticism' and cite his sources. I may do this myself if I get time. --Sumdog (talk) 16:17, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Sydney Times article has been discused several times on TT Talk page, it failure is it draws too much on Two Websites that have been repeatedly dinied as credible sources. Twelve Tribes Teaching.com and Twelve tribes-ex. Weaponbb7 (talk) 18:57, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FDW777 (talk) 14:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hi Sumdog! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 14:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]