User talk:Thermofan

As this is my Talk Page, I hope it is in order to jot a note about myself. There are so many guidelines that any edit seems daunting to me. In the beginning I started off in thermodynamics, therefore ‘Thermofan’. It has nothing to do with cooking. My latest interest is film and pixels. Thermofan (talk) 21:12, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Super hi vision/Ultra high definition video talk page

Hi. You responded to me on the UHDTV talk page. I was unsure what you meant about IMAX (related to the 24 fps stuff compared to 60 fps for Super Hi Vision). I think you were crystal clear on your comments; however, not everything makes perfect sense to me, try as I may. You can read that talk page and see the new posts I made if it interests you to do so. But if you have more important Wikipedia tasks to perform, I promise you I won't take offense. Have a great day or night or whatever, depending on when you read this. By the way, thanks for responding on that particular talk page! 67.182.237.57 (talk) 05:56, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My full answer is at the Talk:Ultra-high-definition television. Thanks for your patience! Thermofan (talk) 22:20, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Perana Performance Group may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

was renamed the AC 378 GT Zagato. Reportedly there are about ten pre-production models completed.]].<ref>http://www.egmcartech.com/2012/03/14/remember-the-perana-z-one-well-its-now-called-the-ac-378-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of obsolete technology

Hi. I noticed your edits of my little addition to the relevant article. It's not a description of obsolete technology in the article. Rather, it references the fact that there are many possible technologies which do not fit in the list. Dege31 (talk) 13:43, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dege31, hi. I have not propperly wrapped my head around the topic of the List of obsolete technology, but it absolutely facinates me. The heading, I think, is acceptable, but we need to differentiate between superceded tech, obsolete tech and defunct tech. I love the concept of tech co-existing. Do we want to list all (relevant) patents, like atari game console, gameboy, etc? What about Concord airplane? Space shuttle? Grass huts?

It is a gigantic topic... but it exites me. Thermofan (talk) 10:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The list currently combines the concepts of superseded and obsolete, but not completely defunct.

It's more retrospective than comprehensive or evolutionary- the past technologies are tied to contemporary ones, not vice versa. Dege31 (talk) 01:26, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I understand and agree. I have way too little time to contribute like I would like to. Thermofan (talk) 07:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]