User talk:Tomekyy

May 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Confederation Liberty and Independence, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vacant0 (talk) 16:45, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Next Ukrainian presidential election

I have difficulty understanding your complete removal of a reasonably-sourced paragraph [1] on the possibility of presidential elections in the times of martial law. You removed a reference to Law "On Legal Regime of Martial Law" writing instead that "The Constitution does not state anything about the prohibition of elections during wartime". There is a law, it is in force, it is related to the subject of the article, and it should be mentioned in this article I think.

A neutral and unbiased section of the Constitution in this article ideally would first summarize all the things written in the Constitution about the subject, and only then it would make sense to mention things that are not in the Constitution, but which are nonetheless of significant importance, as expressed in reliable sources.

Your statements like "Petro Poroshenko can concentrate on his electoral base in the east of Ukraine"[2], "The Volodymyr Zelenskyy stronghold is the east Ukraine"[3] have to be supported by references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.211.78.213 (talk) 22:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite a constitution paragraph, not an opinion. The Constitution do not state anything about the postponement of elections Tomekyy (talk) 17:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Constitution of Ukraine states the dates of regular elections. Laws elaborate on many details. In Ukraine, there could be special or repeated elections too. If you happen to know that the constitutionality of Article 19 of Law "On Legal Regime of Martial Law" was ever challenged in the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, then please write about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.211.159.251 (talk) 18:41, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello, I'm Vacant0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Confederation Liberty and Independence, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vacant0 (talk) 08:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You also did not provide reliable source. Tomekyy (talk) 08:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tomekyy: That is not true. The "Ideology and position" section of the page is full of WP:Reliable sources. WP:BRD: You're bold changes have been reverted by multiple other editors, now you would need to discuss on the article Talk page. If you do, please bring reliable sources. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

In short, you cannot edit about the Arab/Israeli conflict until you are extended-confirmed, which means your account is 30 days old with 500 edits(you don't have 500 edits). This applies to any type of page on Wikipedia and is broadly construed. 331dot (talk) 00:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is clear. However, I have option to discuss and provide suggestions for improvements. Tomekyy (talk) 01:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did not edited a page I simply participated in the discussion. Tomekyy (talk) 01:05, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, you do not 'have option to discuss and provide suggestions for improvements'. You can post edit requests per WP:EDITXY. That is the only thing you can do. If something is not that one thing, it is not an available option. Sean.hoyland (talk) 05:58, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]