User talk:Toroko

Bekescsaba

I would like you to stop the edit war over the city names in there.

I deleted only your first contribution, i did so coincidentally right after your second addition (which I did not know about at the time). But it doesn't change the substance of the dispute at all.

First of all: it is natural, that the official page of a Hungarian town would use Hungarian names. Just as a Slovak page would use Miškovec for example. But this is an international space and the actual official names should be used in here. If you would like the names to be translated, then the German names must be mentioned as well, as the cities in question have been a part of the Austrian empire for quite some time as well.

Second - if only some names are translated, it is a discriminatory practice. Why shouldn't say Tarnowskie Gory be translated as well, what about the Czechs or Germans who read the article?

Third - I have brought legitimate information into the article. You are deleting it repeatedly and without any good reason to do so. THAT, sir, is more like vandalism to me. wlad 10:32, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you noticed, I did not delete anything, I just add more information. I don't mind the Hungarian names, but if they can be mentioned, so can all the other ones. wlad 12:14, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your ANI complaint about a possible sock

Hello Toroko. I saw this report about Aradic-es. If you want to file it at WP:Sockpuppet investigations, let me know and I'll try to help evaluate it. I would probably advise running a checkuser. EdJohnston (talk) 02:57, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think you did that properly. When I have some time, I should figure out if this edit might be evidence of long-term edit warring that should be added to the report. This repeats some unsourced material that 195.29.221.170 (talk · contribs) (presumably his sock) was trying to push into the Habsburg Monarchy about 19 times between May and September. If you want to add this to the SPI report yourself you could do so. Otherwise I'll try to get to it later. EdJohnston (talk) 21:08, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pacta Conventa

User Kebeta did not invent the Pacta Conventa. See, for instance, http://www.johannita.hu/tortenelem.html. Maproom (talk) 19:03, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Toroko, stop edit-warring. Discuss the matter first on the Personal union talk page. --Kebeta (talk) 19:06, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Toroko, there're recent attempts from Hungarian historiography to meet the arguments from Croatian historiography and vice versa, without losing scientific basis because of "political corectness".
Regarding Pacta Conventa, here's my message on the talkpage of article Croatia in personal union with Hungary (someone selwilllingly redirected the article) [1]. See section "Some comparative sources".
If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Questions are welcomed. Kubura (talk) 04:37, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is your goal here?

Can you give one good reason why I shouldn't punish you for edit warring at 1102? 3RR doesn't mean you have to edit three time a day; long-term edit warring is just as disruptive, and flying in to revert isn't productive. This kind of "don't edit this page" attitude is also inappropriate, especially since I don't see a single discussion from you in a long while short of this statement. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:43, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Slow edit war at 1102. Thank you. No such user (talk) 07:45, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

You've been disruptive for long enough. Repeatedly reverting to your version of articles is disruptive and not productive. If you are working to discuss and work with people (without the "Croatian POV" name-calling), then I have no problem allowing your return. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:15, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This block is unjustified

Ricky81682 you are ridiculous. You should block those, who are really disruptive. Toroko (talk) 15:44, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]