User talk:TotalFailure

Welcome!

Hello, TotalFailure, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Round Maple (talk) 08:36, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Anna Ritter.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Anna Ritter.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

== She died a long time ago...so long ago that she could not possibly be in copyright in any civilized country, and this is a picture of her, which I got from my files because I tend to save such things. So if you really care, then don't give me this crap. I'm sorry I bothered.

File:Anna Ritter.jpg needs authorship information.

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Anna Ritter.jpg is missing information as to its authorship (and or source) , or if such information is provided it is confusing.

Although images may not need author information in un-controversial cases, or where an applicable source is provided, such information aids those making use of the image, and helps verify the copyright status of an image.

If possible, please consider updating the media information page to make the authorship (and or source) of this media clearer.

If the media is your own work, please consider explicitly including your user name or using the {{own}} template on the media information page.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:22, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Silbenstrich

A tag has been placed on Silbenstrich, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Adam mugliston Talk 06:42, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hans Gerhard Gräf

The article Hans Gerhard Gräf has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced biography of German researcher/writer.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hasteur (talk) 20:20, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Silbenstrich

The article Silbenstrich has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDICTIONARY)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 01:24, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Easier way to wikilink.

Howdy TotalFailure, I noticed your edit to Chenopodiaceae, and saw when you made a wikilink to mediterranean climates, you typed it like this [[mediterranean climate|mediterranean climates]]. Just to let you know, there is a much easier way to link to this, and all others like it. All you have to do is type this: [[mediterranean climate]]s (the final 's' just gets sucked into the rest of the link). Results for yours and my examples are bulleted below:

mediterranean climates = your example
mediterranean climates = my example.

It will save you some time. Happy editing! Hamamelis (talk) 19:38, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on Talk:Silbenstrich, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Inks.LWC (talk) 08:09, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Silbenstrich. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Inks.LWC (talk) 08:10, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on Talk:Hans Gerhard Gräf, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Hasteur (talk) 11:53, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Hans Gerhard Gräf. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Hasteur (talk) 11:53, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TotalFailure. You have new messages at Talk:Hans Gerhard Gräf.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hasteur (talk) 11:53, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

All anyone is asking you to do is add some references. Have you ever seen an encyclopedia which didn't cite them? Would you trust the information in one that didn't? I wouldn't. Only blogs and the like do not show references, because they all rely on peoples' opinions of things. Wikipedia is not a blog. You are getting inflamed over nothing. If you know your topics, which you appear to, then please provide references. For instance, the article Josef Triebensee looks great. You did excellent work! But it doesn't show anything backing it up. And please don't go around insulting people, what does that help? All it does is make other editors as pissed off as you are, and reflect poorly on yourself. No one has insulted you, they have only asked you to adhere to the standard policy of providing more references. You are not being singled out - we all have to do that. I don't see the problem with simply providing evidence of fact. Thanks, Hamamelis (talk) 11:55, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Johann Otto Uhde

The article Johann Otto Uhde has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced. Fails WP:GNG/WP:BIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 16:45, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Jepp.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jepp.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Dearborn, Michigan, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) (talk) 23:04, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:HolzSchlaf.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:HolzSchlaf.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:06, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ludwig Hirsch

The article Ludwig Hirsch has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SwisterTwister talk 05:34, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

Medical articles on Wikipedia must be cited by the best available evidence and written in a consistent format. We typically uses review articles. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. Additionally, the diberri tool will aid in the formatting of references; all one needs to do is cut and paste the results. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Cheers. --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:27, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Manfred Berliner

The article Manfred Berliner has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Nik thestoned 17:11, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:BerlinerCora.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:BerlinerCora.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 20:20, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Johann Baptist Malfatti von Monteregio

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Johann Baptist Malfatti von Monteregio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. That's me! ^{Have doubt?} What I done? 06:56, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you!!! for your edits at Henry Ford, adding relevant citations that were sorely missing all the years prior, adding greatly to the article's objectivity and completness, which was sorely lacking before your contribution. Cheers! WillNess (talk) 12:35, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Neoclassical architecture, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Levittown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Paper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Straws (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Nazism in Sweden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Lane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Ammergau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyrol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Maurice Ravel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SACEM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. When you recently edited Burckhardt Helferich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emil Fischer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

Hi. When you recently edited U10 (Berlin U-Bahn), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lichterfelde (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. When you recently edited El Dorado Park, Long Beach, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Gabriel River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. When you recently edited Der Kanon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Walser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References, Paper size

Hi! In Paper Sizes, you made an edit in April of 2011 stating that "The main disadvantage of the system is type does not scale the same way; therefore, when a page is resized, the type set on it loses legibility as the proportion between the type's x-height, page margins, and leading are distorted. " Could you provide a reference or add more detail? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.235.136.126 (talk) 05:41, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Chiavette1.svg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:24, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TotalFailure. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TotalFailure. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kamala Harris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Willie Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Wham!, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 05:30, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Careful!

"Date style correction (in narrative text, the day comes after the month, the way it is spoken)."

No, no, no. This is a cultural thing, and it was wrong of you to change it without giving a better reason. Please read MOS:DATERET. Philip Trueman (talk) 03:22, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Terry Nichols, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simon Reeve (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. I warned you two days ago about adding poorly sourced fringe material, you deleted that notice, you have not engaged with other Wikipedians, but you have continued adding fringe material at Terry Nichols (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). I do not think you understand or accept the nature of our rules on fringe content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Guy (Help!) 15:59, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|1=I am a professional media researcher at the 9th Street Independent Film Center in San Francisco, CA. where I work in a support capacity for documentary filmmakers. Formerly, I was a published classical music critic with the San Francisco Classical Voice, and I have been interviewed nationally on Air America Radio by Al Franken and in the New York Times. In the course of researching a documentary about Fake News and Disinformation, I started reviewing numerous wikipedia articles regarding sensitive issues and so-called conspiracy theories in the category of Fringe materials because it forms part of the Documentary. When I research, I believe in improving Wikipedia if I can. I have many-year history of excellent Wikipedia edits, although I am not an active "community member," I felt some of these articles were unfair and part of the disinformation I was actually researching. As an example, I once was given a Barnstormer award for restructuring the article of Henry Ford, and I was applauded by the Wikipedia community for my fair and balances statements regarding Ford's antisemitism.

One article in particular was the article on "conspiracy theory," the subject of my team's own research, which I edited to include the excellent research of Lance DeHaviland published by the University of Texas, Austin, press as Volume 5 of the "Discovering America" series, a copy of which I own and was referring to. The existing Wikipedia article did not have the most recent and factually-based peer reviewed material based on this subject. For example, it did not refer to the term itself as a "meme" and it did not give its original origins in the sense of "theory of case" which was appropriated by the CIA in a specific document in 1967 as a mean to discredit criticism of the Kennedy Assassination. DeHaviland discusses how such use of the term in a disparaging sense has backfired, in the sense of "only a theory" in regard to Evolution. All in all, I put in a good five hours improving the article with extensive inline sourcing none of which was on the "talk page." At the time of the edits, there was no presentation of the need to talk about the article. In fact, in auto-confirmed only articles, which I have encountered over the years, I often go ahead and improve them because there are barriers to fixing problems with the article. IOn this case, the basic text of the article was part of the disinformation. Furthermore, the article was presented with a memo, "this article may be improved with text from the corresponding article from German Wikipedia" which indicated to me that the article was already in need of improvement and flawed. I speak fluent German, and, in fact, I reviewed the relevant German article and literally brought in the suggestion of using it - and this is somehow disparaged as "fringe" defacing. You may observe from my history, I've spent many many hours translating German into English on this site including the poetry of Osterwald.

A hyper-vigilant editor, whom I actually believe may work for the intelligence services based on his own work, took offense at these edits, and I challenged him on his own talk-page for a biased view out of context of the work of DeHaviland and others in meta-media and meta-journalism (specifically the phenomenon of journalistic blackout). The editor overreacted blocking me permanently. I fear that particular editor is preserving an unbalanced bubble, not breaking it. This undoes over a decade of positive contributions to Wikipedia and is unfair. The rewritten introduction to the article was truly excellent, fair, and balanced. If he reverted, that's one thing, but it seemed like he didn't read it.

I only observed the block when I came back to edit the article on Sala Burton as part of a San Francisco history Documentary I'm now researching for KQED and noticed the article was woefully inadequate. I guess Sala Burton is "Fringe" but it's really really silly to see this overreaction, which only happened when I brought up the issue on that user's Talk Page - which he then blocks me permanently for "not using talk" !!!! If anyone needs to be blocked for being a prick, it's that guy}

(Non-administrator comment) Hello. Please note that your unblock request is malformed: it lacks a closing bracket which you should close for it to take effect. It is however ironic to notice that it also contains conspiracy theories (I hope that you do not believe that I too am an agent). In relation to the conspiracy theory article, one editor reverted your inappropriate changes, another warned you, then I commented on the first's talk page on why those edits were problematic, then noticed that you were soon blocked. I see no evidence that the administrator who blocked you had any special previous interaction with you, other than warning and eventually taking action for inserting fringe conspiracy theories as facts in multiple articles (including WP:BLP) despite warnings. On Wikipedia, article (and talk page) history, user contributions and block logs are very transparent. In your previous editing history, I do see some better contributions, although various lacked sources. Another concern in the block summary was failure to communicate or reach consensus (like simply blanking received warnings then repeating similar edits elsewhere). I suggest making a shorter unblock request which demonstrates an understanding on how and why this behavior was wrong and why you should be unblocked (what you intend to improve constructively on Wikipedia), which would likely be better received by admins. Thanks, —Paleo Neonate – 11:47, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Silbenstrich for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Silbenstrich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silbenstrich until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PepperBeast (talk) 00:11, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Civic Openness In Negotiations

The article Civic Openness In Negotiations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is an article about an obscure local ordinance adopted in five cities and one county that has negligible news coverage and has been rendered inoperative by state law. The article itself is a near-orphan, with only a handful of pages linking to it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Cleanup of TotalFailure's opinions continues on, 5 years after his ban. Removed Original Research edited into Rapping back in 2012. JGray (talk) 02:16, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]