User talk:Tt1

Welcome!

Hello, Tt1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Ghirla | talk 17:26, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, then. Keep in touch and take care. I don't understand your comment completely.ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 19:27, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, are you a troll? What's the point of starting identical stubs? Are they of any help to anyone? Perhaps your limited command of the language is to blame, but your stubs have that disadvantage that when I find the time to write the articles in earnest, they will not be eligible for WP:DYK as too old. Please cool off and find a more fruitful mode of editing. --Ghirla | talk 17:26, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to every other source, Brigadegeneral was not introduced until after WWII and Sturmfuhrer was not an SS rank (at least, not by WWII). Your sources appear to be wrong. -- Necrothesp 20:14, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comparative military ranks of World War II

Почему ты изменяешь Comparative military ranks of World War II? Можешь ты объяснить? Можешь ты доказать что Brigadengeneral, Sturmfuhrer и Unterleutnant существовали? Я не могу найти любую книгу говорит то. Izehar 20:33, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Согласно моей книге, "The Armed Forces of World War II", Brigadengeneral, Sturmfuhrer и Unterleutnant не существовал в течение мировой войны 2. Кроме того, почему ты помещаешь Generalissimo выше Admiral of the Fleet, Field Marshal и Marshal of the RAF? Izehar 20:50, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Согласно моим книгам - Brigadegeneral существовал с конца 1944 года, Sturmfuhrer и Unterleutnant существовали с 1943 года в течение мировой войны. Generalissimo (Сёгун в Японии) и тому похожие - есть высшие воинское звание, которое может быть теоретически или практически присвоенно в вооружённых силах стран мира и оно выше армейских званий:Маршал,Фельдмаршал,Генералфельдмаршал, а также выше морских званий: Адмирал флота,Флот адмирал,Адмирал флота (СССР, России),Флагман флота,Гросадмирал,Генерал-адмирал,Капитан-генерал и так далее.Tt1 21:14, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you for 24 hours for violation of the 3RR. -- Necrothesp 00:20, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR notice

Blocked for three-revert rule violation

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for 24 hours for violating the three revert rule on Comparative military ranks of World War II. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} to this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also e-mail the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username and IP address in your e-mail.

Non-existent SS ranks

Please stop adding non-existent SS ranks to the article in question like Brigadegeneral (not used in WWII) and Oberster Reichsführer (no source that any such rank ever existed). Your changes are being constantly reverted by several users. Please visit the talk page of articles if you want to make such radical changes; but, as it stands, your edits appear to be unsourced and incorrect. -Husnock 21:14, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Husnock-Stop revert my edits. You write not correct and not exact data! If you do not know Russian and German language-it your problem. The Soviet military ranks of the period of the second world war and their equivalence are written on many sites and in many books, especially in Russian. To not trust them at me there is no reason! German ranks SS and their equivalence are written on many sites and in many books including in German. According to them-Der Oberster Reichsführer der Schutzstaffel it's a the highest title and a rank in SS. This rank had no special uniform, because had it only Hitler. To challenge them silly! Tt1 14:50, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In accordence with Wikipedia policy, disputed edits will be removed until you can provide valid sources. I have studied WWII since 1986 and half of what you are writting I have never seen in any valid source or textbook. Bring your thoughts to the talk pages. Edit warring will only lead to article protection. And, no offenseive, but if you do not have full command over the English language, you really should not be writing articles on an English language encyclopedia. Your edits and articles are very hard to figure out due to bad grammer and incoherent sentences. -Husnock 15:26, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When your block expires, please be aware that I plan to write a new section in the SS ranks article about senior SS titles (not ranks) to include any that Hitler might have held. Please, please, do not go back to sticking these disputed ranks into the rank tables. I promise they will be at least be mentioned in the section I plan to write. -Husnock 23:53, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Roitr

Then my first instinct was correct after looking at these comments - please stop adding factually bankrupt, incoherent, or non-existant ranks into our articles. I have asked you time and time again on your old talk page that we are not here to make up imaginary ranks. This is not Star Trek, there are no "Enterprise" ranks - so please allow us to insert encyclopedic content within the articles without your constant revision and blatant disregard for accurate information. Thank you.

Пожалуйста, прекратите вносить в наши статьи неточную информацию. Я пытаюсь оставить вам это сообщение на русском языке, потому что вы не отвечаете на предупреждения по-английски. Я хочу, чтобы Вы знали, что если вы будете продолжать вносить в статьи информацию, не соответствующую действительности, то вы будете блокированы. ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 15:20, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

В действительности, я сказал вас на сперва том, котор вы были Roitr пытаясь замаскировать их редактирует к нескольким воинских шереножных статьей. [1] Я реально думаю что вы получают, что будете вандалом на Википе́дия - вы не помогаете! Вы ушибаете энциклопедию если вы будете "Roitr.", то Если вы не будете "Roitr", то я огорченн для обвинять вас.

Я надеюсь вы понимает меня, вас близко разрушало содержание много статьей. Эти вклюают Ranks of the People's Liberation Army, Army ranks and insignia of the Russian Federation, Air Force ranks and insignia of the Russian Federation, и другие. Пожалуйста не делайте это снова.ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 15:34, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ваш русский плох. Где вы выучили их, в сбросе?

No, I did not learn Russian in a dump...I actually don't speak it at all - such a nice thing to say. ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 19:40, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for support the proper version of the table Comparative military ranks of World War II! I will also add some ranks of Chinese army.--Nixer 05:05, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My revision

It is not necessary to me that you don't believe me. DimaY2K - he is not the professor and not the military academician. I want that here wrote the exact information, instead of erroneous. You badly know Russian and do many mistakes. Therefore it is not necessary to argue with me how correctly to write in Russian авиа́ции or а́виации. Stalin became the Marshal of the USSR in 06.03.1943 and Generalissimo in 27.06.1945. Look about it many books and sites:

History of the rank, uniform - In it is written - The rank of Marshal was in November 1943 conferred on Joseph Stalin himself. Soon after the war it is held by two Stalin's associates, Lavrenti P. Beria and Nikolai A. Bulganin, who never were military commanders (both were later deprived of the rank). As for Stalin, he becomes, June 27, 1945, Generalissimo of the Soviet Union. Particular rank badges for Generalissimo were never elaborated, and the Soviet leader wore a jacket with Marshal's shoulder-straps. This rank formally existed until the dissolution of the USSR but was never conferred on anyone but Stalin.

The service ranks of the soldiers of Russia and USSR. - see THE VIII. Period of 1943-1945. - On 26 June, 1945, by the Decree of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR is introduced the title generalissimo, which on 27 June, 1945, was appropriated to the supreme commander-in-chief by the armed forces OF THE USSR To I.V.Stalin.

Encyclopedia—Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin-Soviet Leader and Stalin - In it is written - The extent to which Stalin as a military leader subsequently contributed to Soviet victory has been fiercely debated among Soviet and Western authors; his forceful leadership was probably a greater asset than his military capability. He directed the war effort from the Kremlin, where he remained when the rest of the government was evacuated. He was voted the rank of marshal of the Soviet Union (1943) and of generalissimo (1945).

USSR ranks 1943-55 and Sovietarmy ranks 1943-55 - In it is written - 26 июня 1945 года И.В.Сталину было присвоено вновь введенное звание "Генералисимус". Он был единственным генералиссимусом Советской Армии.

Also you can see File:Supreme or General Officers 1940-1945.xls Soviet Supreme or General Officers 1940-1945 or Supreme or General Officers 1940-1945- see numbers 5720 and 5721- СТАЛИН Иосиф Виссарионович-Маршал Советского Союза 06.03.1943, Генералиссимус Советского Союза 27.06.1945.

About Chief Marshal of the Air Force and other Marshal have gone out of use only in 1990 -1991 you can see sovarm 1980-93 and rusarm-1985-92 - In it is written - К концу 1990 года маршальские звания родов войск вообще исчезают. Хотя они остаются в системе званий, однако их имеют лишь несколько престарелых военачальников, которые лишь числятся на службе (маршалы увольнению в запас не подлежат, их служба пожизненная).Last period for which there were changes in system of the Soviet ranks were 1980-1991, not 1988-1991.

I think you, not I, need to do some external research before you keep editing to Wikipedia and your personally knowledge wrong. You,not I,add incoherent, unverified, and senseless "facts" about USSR and Russia to the Wikipedia. And in 100 times I repeat that not Roitr but in some clauses I am agree with him, though not in all and with you was not agree-with some not checked up by you data. Please don't change, don't erase and don't redirect my page Tt1 - is my personal page and I shall decide what to erase here and that was not. Also don't count clause which I corrected and edited, I don't count yours corrected and edited-correct your changes or not. Thank you for your understanding-Tt1 23:30, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions have mostly been in line with Roitr's and have been removed by SEVERAL people (you want a tiny example). I don't speak Russian - not even a little - so the reason I make mistakes is because the translation service I use isn't the best. As for the "incoherent ranks" that I may add - let me politely refer you to the old version of this talk page that were filled with messages telling you to stop adding bad info here. And before you go on raving to me about what is so bad about what I do, I suggest you learn to parse an English sentence, because your syntax is horrible. I don't care if I don't speak Russian - don't get arrogant with me because you do. I actually speak three languages (one of which was self tought) and I will be gaining a fourth one...I don't like to brag, but your getting a little too pompous for a vandal. The truth is that you should have been blocked a long time ago - and before you start adding info to the SOviet military rank article, see that my contributions had verifiable sources. Один день я могу выучить русского, поэтому не хвастаю о ошибках которые электронное обслуживание, котор я использую может создать. ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 02:24, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I responded to the question in further at the said talk page. This whole ordeal has confused me, Roitr. ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 02:39, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I owe you an apology after seeing some of the things you added are right :-) You need to calm yourself, though. But, an inquiring mind would like to know if you're Roitr?

Sorry, Русское трудное для того чтобы выучить? Смогли вы помощь научить мне, поэтому я не посмотрю как тупоумное больше? ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 02:41, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military ranks of the Soviet Union

Tt1, you are correct about the "авиа́ции" word but wrong about lyotchik. In russia civil pilots a called "пило́т" (pilót), and military pilots are called "лё́тчик" (lyótchik), it is a military profession not a rank same as pilot not a rank in any military. Word "солда́т" (soldát) means soldier and used same way as in english. Word "моря́к" (moryák) in russian comes from word "море́" (moryé) meaning sea so in general speech it coul be translated as a seaman (even some online translaters do that) or as a sailor, but in military ranks important is the equevalency not the translation, and the equivalent to U.S. rank of seeman would be russian rank of matros, while moryak is general term which could applied to anybody who seves in navy or in a civil fleet. --DimaY2K 13:39, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Нет слов. 6^@. --DmitryKo 16:51, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Komandor

Please discuss this rank at the WWII ranks talk page. It was disputed before the last article protection, it is disputed again, and I ask that you discuss instead of edit warring and inserting it over and over again. You are also close to violating the 3 Revert Rule. -Husnock 20:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What are your "sources" for this rank? A non-German source calling it something else means nothing since the German sources indicate Komandor was the word for Commander and not an actual naval rank. This "rank" will no doubt continue to be removed and I urge you not to start another edit war. Also, using alternate user IDs and sockpuppet IP addresses to reinsert reverted information, thus circumventing the Three Revert Rule, is generaly frowned upon and easier to spot than you might think. Not that I'm saying that you're doing that... -Husnock 21:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marszałek

Tt1, the articles you refer to describe modern usage of the term, not the 1939-1945 usage. During WWII Marszałek was above modern OF-10, as he was a sole person (as opposed to modern Field Marshals in other armies) and he was more or less equivalent to a Generalissimus - yet with actual command over the troops. Also, generał armii was not introduced until 1954. 1954 is almost 10 years after the war, please stop adding it. Halibu tt 23:20, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many сountries have one person in at one time in the title Marshal of Poland in WWII too is equivalent to other Marshals. Primo Maresciallo dell'Impero is equivalent to Chinese WWII rank Chief Marshal of China and not to Generalissimo of China and not to Generalissimo of other countries. Also I correct Italy ranks Italian Army official Web Site-WWII ranks, Ranks of NATO military personnel: Officers Tt1 16:52, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edit Wars and Sock Puppets

I would highly suggest that you either provide some sources for your edits and stop edit warring. Comparative military ranks of World War II is presently up for page protection. Also, the use of sockpuppets to bypass the 3 revert rule will not be tolerated. Log in, step up, and claim your edits. -Husnock 16:36, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a result of your edit warring as an anonymous user, you have been blocked for 24 hours. Regards, howch e ng {chat} 18:34, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a result of your attempting to evade your block by using User:Roitr, you are now blocked indefinitely. Sorry. howch e ng {chat} 19:38, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe that was a little harsh. I've reduced the block to 24 hours again. Regards, howch e ng {chat} 22:11, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see that nothing has changed with your attitude about edit wars. Let me tell you this then...if you continue to reinsert disputed data over and over again, ignoring established sources and refusing to discuss things on a talk page, you will be reported for vandalism and blocked. I also have warned you before about using sockpuppets and anon accounts to bypass the Three Revert Rule. What you are doing is nothing less than attacking articles and causing alot of other users a large amount of grief who have worked hard on these articles. You are headed for lenghty blocks and maybe even a ban if you keep this up. Fair warning. Work with the system and not agains it. Stop your edit wars NOW. -Husnock 19:24, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Husnock you continue to reinsert disputed data over and over again, ignoring established sources and refusing to discuss things on a talk page. Many argued on a talk page and to a common opinion do not send. I specified the checked up sources both about ranks of the USSR and about ranks of Italy. I also have made a mark 4-The ranks be found in the table outrank than OF-10 - these ranks were honorary, or were awarded in limited or unusual circumstances, their equivalence approximate and establishing an exact correlation among them is impossible. From for these ranks there was a dispute and I have made this an average between disputable versions. Tt1 20:20, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am refusing to discuss things on talk pages and ignoring established sources? Please see Talk:Ranks and insignia of the Schutzstaffel for the numerous times I have tried to work things out with you, only to be ignored and have you begin edit wars. I am not the only user who feels this way and, if this progresses any further, we will have to resort to "Wikipedia:Requests for comment" on your actions. -Husnock 20:30, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Husnock! I do not begin war and on the contrary I have ceased to add disputable ranks in the table as you asked and consequently that you have made the separate reference as you promised Tt1 21:07, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Three Revert Violation on Comparative military ranks of World War II

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. -Husnock 21:29, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Husnock I have a question to you: why you do revert only to me. I not one do revert more than three times in this page. It did still many other users and you not blocked them In last time I write correct ranks and don't write disputable ranks аs you asked me. See many sources http://www.regiamarina.net, http://www.kotfsc.com/aviation/italynavyranks.htm, http://www.kotfsc.com/aviation/graphics/italyranks-main.jpg, http://www.esercito.difesa.it and I always make an effort to discuss my changes. -Tt1 21:49, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to this edit history, you reverted the page at least 4 times in 24 hours. Other users did not, but stayed within the 3 revert limit. Visit Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR if you feel this is an unjust blocking. However, based on your block log, violation of the Three Revert Rule appears to be a habit. Also, according to the blocklog, you tried to circumvent the block by using an anon IP address shortly afterwards. You have been warned before regarding this behavior. -Husnock 22:18, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that you are wrong, other users too revert this page is more than 3 times I do not know why, but at new connection to the Internet I receive another IP address. Probably it is specificity of the provider.-Tt1 14:49, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not wrong. The edit history speaks for itself. Report me at the Noticeboard if you think this is unfair. You are well known as a violator of the 3 Revert Rule and a user of sockpuppets to bypass blocks. Everyone knows it, and so do you. Why do you play these games? Leave Wikipedia in peace. People are getting tired of this. -Husnock 21:52, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Speed_Skiing.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Speed_Skiing.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 21:08, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Using Sockpuppets to circumvent Blocks

You have been confirmed by Checkuser as well as several other edits as being the same user as User:Roitr who was blocked earlier today for 3 revert violation. In addition, you are highly suspected of being the same user as User:Alexr23, who was blocked for 1 week for violating the 3 revert rule and then using anon IP addresses to circumvent the block, leading to Comparative military ranks of World War II having to be protected. -Husnock 18:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I was talking about his open proxies from Israel for a while now.

Хуже всякого глухого, кто не хочет слушать. ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 22:50, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Encyclopedist! Note that I was talking about his open proxies from Israel for a while now. Worse any deaf person who does not wish to listen.(Хуже всякого глухого, кто не хочет слушать). I have not absolutely understood that you wished to tell me. You support and trust me or not? I many times wrote that I do not know why, but at new connection to the Internet I receive another IP address. Why I have open proxies, I don't know. Probably it is specificity of the provider.--Tt1 11:23, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Add tags as you were blocked indef. in the first place. Das Vindaya, Comrade. ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 16:38, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Hi

Hi Encyclopedist! Note that I was talking about his open proxies from Israel for a while now. Worse any deaf person who does not wish to listen.(Хуже всякого глухого, кто не хочет слушать). I have not absolutely understood that you wished to tell me. You support and trust me or not? I many times wrote that I do not know why, but at new connection to the Internet I receive another IP address. Why I have open proxies, I don't know. Probably it is specificity of the provider.--Tt1 11:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roitr, please do not give me trouble. We are finding you out, you were blocked and you editted this page under one of those silly IPs and signing this as "Tt1". Это не будет игра, и я не хочу сыграть.ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 16:32, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I many times wrote that I do not know why, but at new connection to the Internet I receive another IP address. Why I have open proxies, I don't know. Probably it is specificity of the provider in Israel and I many times wrote that I am not Roitr. All of you not fairly pursue me and don't trust me. It is not correct! --Tt1 17:48, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Before you waste my talk space yet AGAIN telling me who you are and aren't I want to state two things: 1, we have already executed an IP check and we know that you two are the same, also you and him are adding information to the exact same articles in the same fashion. 2, you and Roitr speak English rather badly "i.e. All of you not fairly pursue me and don't trust me." It is evident who you are, and you have been blocked a long time ago, so instead of whining here again I suggest you edit in a constructive manner and maybe we won't "not fairly pursue you" or whatever you were trying to say. Perhaps I could respect you if you did not come to me talking about my bad Russian and how I "do many mistakes" and if you could parse an English sentence as you are on the English Wikipedia. If you vandalize the Russian Wikipedia, that's bad, but coming and insulting others simply makes YOU look bad. And those claims you were making about being a war and military history professor seem pretty ridiculous considering the amount of misinformation you have been putting here. Civility and all is great, but in response to your complaints, I suggest you take two quarters: File:State-Quarters-Obv-Unc.jpg File:State-Quarters-Obv-Unc.jpg, and call someone who gives a damn. WP:CIVIL and all is great, but some things need to be said - I've tried talking to you nicely, then in Russian, now it may be time to get a little nasty. ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 20:56, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What does "заёба" mean, by the way? ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 18:02, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great - but who has the tag on their page, I love you man! ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 21:43, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you were right about some things, but wrong about most :-) ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 21:55, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Toe walley

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Toe walley, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! --Hansnesse 20:20, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the copyright violation notice until the issue has been resolved. Thanks, --Hansnesse 21:33, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Account blocked

You are blocked for forty eight hours for edit warring and using several anon ip addresses to violate the policy of the Wikipedia:Three-revert rule on Naval ranks and insignia of the Russian Federation -Husnock 17:20, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Investigation

I noticed that you actually managed to parse a very tangy English sentence -this interesting two word response directed toward me shows that I have done you wrong. I guess you can parse a few sentences :-). At anyrate, you should know that your better half Roitr has been blocked indefinitely, thanks to a wonderful admin whose name I will not disclose as it would be easy to find out who they are easily enough. You have been listed at Wikipedia:Requests for investigation in order for us to figure out who you are, even as obvious as it is. We do appreciate your edits here, and I do admit that you were correct on some things. The constant misinformation, revision of other people's attempts to correct your mistakes and general hostile attitude makes me think it best that this action take place. I hope to hear some good things about you/Roitr/Nixer in the future (I all think that you are the same person [all living in Israel, Russian as the mother tongue, English spoken poorly, and all interested in the same articles is not a coincedence, it is a certainty).

I hope you aren't angry, and I am sorry that you had to tell me "пошёл на хуй." I hope you'll never get that upset with me again. ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 09:36, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cameroon at the 2006 Winter Olympics

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Cameroon at the 2006 Winter Olympics, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.145.161.43 14:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Torash_s.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Torash_s.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Russia-airforce-1994_10-1-.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Russia-airforce-1994_10-1-.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:33, 11 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 15:33, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Russia-army-1994_03.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Russia-army-1994_03.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 16:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Russia-navy-shoulder-1994_14-1-.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Russia-navy-shoulder-1994_14-1-.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Russia-navy-shoulder-1994_16-1-.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Russia-navy-shoulder-1994_16-1-.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Russia-navy-sleeve_-1994_02.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Russia-navy-sleeve_-1994_02.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:11, 11 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:11, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Russia-navy-sleeve_12.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Russia-navy-sleeve_12.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:11, 11 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:11, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Russia-navy-sleeve-1994_06.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Russia-navy-sleeve-1994_06.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:13, 11 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:13, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Russia-navy-sleeve-1994_07.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Russia-navy-sleeve-1994_07.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Russia-navy-sleeve-1994_08.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Russia-navy-sleeve-1994_08.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Russia-navy-sleeve-1994_09.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Russia-navy-sleeve-1994_09.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Russia-navy-sleeve-1994_10.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Russia-navy-sleeve-1994_10.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Russia-navy-sleeve-1994_11.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Russia-navy-sleeve-1994_11.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:16, 11 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:16, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Chief_Marshal_of_Engineer_Troops_and_of_Chief_Marshal_of_Signals.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Chief_Marshal_of_Engineer_Troops_and_of_Chief_Marshal_of_Signals.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 00:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chief_Marshal_of_Engineer_Troops_and_of_Chief_Marshal_of_Signals.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Chief_Marshal_of_Engineer_Troops_and_of_Chief_Marshal_of_Signals.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 06:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]